Suppr超能文献

急诊医师的失眠风险和催眠药物使用。

Risk of insomnia and hypnotics use among emergency physicians.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Feng Yuan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (R.O.C.).

Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan (R.O.C.).

出版信息

Ind Health. 2021 Mar 24;59(2):99-106. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2020-0217. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

Abstract

This study investigated the risk of insomnia and hypnotics use among emergency physicians. This cross-sectional study recruited physicians working in Taiwanese hospitals in 2015 and the general population as the participants. Data from 1,097 emergency physicians obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database were grouped into the case group, whereas 14,112 nonemergency physicians and 4,388 people from the general population were categorized into the control groups. This study used logistic regression and conditional logistic regression to compare the risks of insomnia between emergency and nonemergency physicians and between emergency physicians and the general population, respectively. The prevalence of insomnia among emergency physicians, nonemergency physicians and general population was 5.56%, 4.08%, and 1.73%, respectively. Compared with nonemergency physicians and the general population, emergency physicians had a significantly higher risk of insomnia. The proportions of emergency physicians, nonemergency physicians, and general population using hypnotics were 19.96%, 18.24%, and 13.26%, respectively. Among emergency physicians who used hypnotics, 49.77%, 25.57%, and 24.66% used only benzodiazepines, only nonbenzodiazepines, and both benzodiazepines and nonbenzodiazepines, respectively. Nonpharmacological interventions to improve insomnia and reminder of safe use of hypnotics to emergency physicians can serve as references for hospitals in developing health-promoting activities.

摘要

这项研究调查了急诊医生患失眠症和使用催眠药物的风险。这是一项横断面研究,于 2015 年招募了在台湾医院工作的医生和普通人群作为参与者。从国家健康保险研究数据库中获得的 1097 名急诊医生的数据被分为病例组,而 14112 名非急诊医生和 4388 名普通人群被分为对照组。本研究使用逻辑回归和条件逻辑回归分别比较了急诊医生和非急诊医生、急诊医生和普通人群之间失眠的风险。急诊医生、非急诊医生和普通人群的失眠患病率分别为 5.56%、4.08%和 1.73%。与非急诊医生和普通人群相比,急诊医生患失眠症的风险明显更高。使用催眠药物的急诊医生、非急诊医生和普通人群的比例分别为 19.96%、18.24%和 13.26%。在使用催眠药物的急诊医生中,分别有 49.77%、25.57%和 24.66%仅使用苯二氮䓬类药物、仅使用非苯二氮䓬类药物和同时使用苯二氮䓬类药物和非苯二氮䓬类药物。改善失眠的非药物干预措施和提醒急诊医生安全使用催眠药物,可以为医院开展促进健康活动提供参考。

相似文献

1
Risk of insomnia and hypnotics use among emergency physicians.急诊医师的失眠风险和催眠药物使用。
Ind Health. 2021 Mar 24;59(2):99-106. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2020-0217. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
[Hypnotics].[催眠药]
Nihon Rinsho. 2012 Jan;70(1):52-7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验