Jansen Kirsten, Beckert Mitchell, Deckard Evan R, Ziemba-Davis Mary, Meneghini R Michael
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
IU Health Hip & Knee Center, Indiana University Health Physicians, Fishers, Indiana.
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Sep 28;5(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00051. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA) have demonstrated excellent mid- and long-term outcomes and have been compared in clinical series for decades; however, to our knowledge, no study has sufficiently matched UKA and TKA cohorts on preoperative osteoarthritis severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes of radiographically and demographically matched UKA and TKA cohorts.
One hundred and thirty-five UKAs and 135 TKAs were matched by patient age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification as well as preoperative osteoarthritis severity in medial and lateral tibiofemoral and patellofemoral compartments (Kellgren-Lawrence grading system). Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, function, activity level, and satisfaction were evaluated at minimum 1-year follow-up via components of the modern Knee Society Score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity-level score, and a Likert satisfaction scale.
The patients in the UKA group reported significantly less pain, a higher activity level, and greater satisfaction while performing several functional activities and could walk for a longer amount of time before stopping due to knee discomfort compared with those in the TKA group (p ≤ 0.038). In addition, a greater proportion of patients in the UKA than in the TKA group were "satisfied or very satisfied" with their knee replacement surgery at minimum 1-year follow-up (90% versus 81%; p = 0.043).
With minimum 1-year follow-up, patients who underwent UKA reported significantly higher function, less pain, and a greater level of patient satisfaction than a radiographically and demographically matched TKA cohort.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
单髁膝关节置换术和全膝关节置换术(UKA和TKA)已显示出优异的中长期疗效,并且在临床系列研究中已被比较了数十年;然而,据我们所知,尚无研究在术前骨关节炎严重程度方面对UKA和TKA队列进行充分匹配。本研究的目的是评估在影像学和人口统计学上匹配的UKA和TKA队列的患者报告结局。
135例UKA和135例TKA通过患者年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)分类以及内侧和外侧胫股关节和髌股关节术前骨关节炎严重程度(Kellgren-Lawrence分级系统)进行匹配。在至少1年的随访中,通过现代膝关节协会评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动水平评分的组成部分以及李克特满意度量表,对患者报告的疼痛、功能、活动水平和满意度等结局指标进行评估。
与TKA组相比,UKA组患者在进行多项功能活动时报告的疼痛明显更少、活动水平更高、满意度更高,并且在因膝关节不适而停止行走之前能够行走更长时间(p≤0.038)。此外,在至少1年的随访中,UKA组中对膝关节置换手术“满意或非常满意”的患者比例高于TKA组(90%对81%;p = 0.043)。
在至少1年的随访中,接受UKA的患者比在影像学和人口统计学上匹配的TKA队列报告了明显更高的功能、更少的疼痛和更高的患者满意度水平。
治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。