• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价老年人的邻里社会经济特征与预先医疗指示

Evaluation of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics and Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults.

机构信息

Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029063. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29063.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29063
PMID:33301019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7729427/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Advance care planning (ACP) is low among older adults with socioeconomic disadvantage. There is a need for tailored community-based approaches to increase ACP, but community patterns of ACP are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and ACP and to identify communities with both low nSES and low rates of ACP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study examined University of California San Francisco electronic health record (EHR) data and place-based data from 9 San Francisco Bay Area counties. Participants were primary care patients aged 65 years or older and living in the San Francisco Bay Area in July 2017. Statistical analysis was performed from May to June 2020.

EXPOSURES

Patients' home addresses were geocoded and assigned to US Census tracts. The primary factor, nSES, an index combining area-level measures of income, education, poverty, employment, occupation, and housing or rent values, was divided into quintiles scaled to the distribution of all US Census tracts in the Bay Area (Q1 = lowest nSES). Covariates were from the EHR and included health care use (primary care, outpatient specialty, emergency department, and inpatient encounters in the prior year).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

ACP was defined as a scanned document (eg, advance directive), ACP Current Procedural Terminology code, or ACP note type in the EHR.

RESULTS

There were 13 104 patients included in the cohort-mean (SD) age was 75 (8) years, with 7622 female patients (58.2%), 897 patients (6.8%) identified as Black, 913 (7.0%) as Latinx, 3788 (28.9%) as Asian/Pacific Islander, and 748 (5.7%) as other minority race/ethnicity, and 2393 (18.3%) self-reported that they preferred to speak a non-English language. Of these, 3827 patients (29.2%) had documented ACP. The cohort was distributed across all 5 quintiles of nSES (Q1: 1426 patients [10.9%]; Q2: 1792 patients [13.7%]; Q3: 2408 patients [18.4%]; Q4: 3330 patients [25.4%]; Q5: 4148 patients [31.7%]). Compared with Q5 and after adjusting for health care use, all lower nSES quintiles showed a lower odds of ACP in a graded fashion (Q1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.61-0.84], Q2: aOR = 0.74 [95% CI, 0.64-0.86], Q3: aOR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71-0.93], Q4: aOR = 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72-0.93]. A bivariable map of ACP by nSES allowed identification of 5 neighborhoods with both low nSES and ACP.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, lower nSES was associated with lower ACP documentation after adjusting for health care use. Using EHR and place-based data, communities of older adults with both low nSES and low ACP were identified. This is a first step in partnering with communities to develop targeted, community-based interventions to meaningfully increase ACP.

摘要

重要性

在社会经济处于不利地位的老年人群体中,预先医疗规划(ACP)的比例较低。需要制定以社区为基础的方法来增加 ACP,但社区 ACP 的模式尚未得到充分理解。

目的

研究邻里社会经济地位(nSES)与 ACP 之间的关系,并确定 nSES 较低且 ACP 率较低的社区。

设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究检查了加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校电子健康记录(EHR)数据和来自旧金山湾区 9 个县的基于地点的数据。参与者是 2017 年 7 月在旧金山湾区居住且年龄在 65 岁或以上的初级保健患者。统计分析于 2020 年 5 月至 6 月进行。

暴露因素

患者的家庭住址进行了地理编码并分配到美国人口普查地段。主要因素 nSES 是一个综合区域收入、教育、贫困、就业、职业以及住房或租金价值指标的指数,分为五分位数,与整个湾区的所有美国人口普查地段的分布相匹配(Q1=最低 nSES)。协变量来自 EHR,包括医疗保健使用(初级保健、门诊专科、急诊和前一年的住院就诊)。

主要结果和措施

ACP 定义为 EHR 中的扫描文档(例如,预先指令)、ACP 当前程序术语代码或 ACP 笔记类型。

结果

该队列包括 13104 名患者,平均(标准差)年龄为 75(8)岁,7622 名女性患者(58.2%),897 名患者(6.8%)被认定为黑人,913 名(7.0%)为拉丁裔,3788 名(28.9%)为亚裔/太平洋岛民,748 名(5.7%)为其他少数民族种族/族裔,2393 名(18.3%)自述更愿意说非英语。其中,3827 名患者(29.2%)有记录的 ACP。该队列分布在 nSES 的所有 5 个五分位数(Q1:1426 名患者[10.9%];Q2:1792 名患者[13.7%];Q3:2408 名患者[18.4%];Q4:3330 名患者[25.4%];Q5:4148 名患者[31.7%])。与 Q5 相比,在调整了医疗保健使用情况后,所有较低的 nSES 五分位数的 ACP 几率均呈梯度降低(Q1:调整后的优势比[aOR]=0.71[95%CI,0.61-0.84],Q2:aOR=0.74[95%CI,0.64-0.86],Q3:aOR=0.81[95%CI,0.71-0.93],Q4:aOR=0.82[95%CI,0.72-0.93])。nSES 按 ACP 的双变量图允许确定 5 个邻里社区,这些社区既具有较低的 nSES,也具有较低的 ACP。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,在调整了医疗保健使用情况后,较低的 nSES 与较低的 ACP 记录相关。使用 EHR 和基于地点的数据,可以确定既有较低 nSES 又有较低 ACP 的老年人群体社区。这是与社区合作制定有针对性的社区为基础的干预措施以切实增加 ACP 的第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/7729427/f59a9552a962/jamanetwopen-e2029063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/7729427/f59a9552a962/jamanetwopen-e2029063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65dd/7729427/f59a9552a962/jamanetwopen-e2029063-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics and Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults.评价老年人的邻里社会经济特征与预先医疗指示
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029063. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29063.
2
Value of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Predicting Risk of Outcomes in Studies That Use Electronic Health Record Data.利用电子健康记录数据的研究中,邻里社会经济地位对预测结局风险的价值。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182716. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2716.
3
Joint Associations of Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status With Mortality in the Multiethnic Cohort Study.多种族队列研究中种族、民族和社会经济地位与死亡率的联合关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226370. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6370.
4
Missed Opportunities and Health Disparities for Advance Care Planning Before Elective Surgery in Older Adults.老年人择期手术前的预先医疗照护计划错失机会与健康差异。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):e223687. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3687. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
The Association Between Neighborhood Environment and Mortality: Results from a National Study of Veterans.邻里环境与死亡率之间的关联:一项退伍军人全国性研究的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):416-422. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3905-x. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
6
Availability of Advance Care Planning Documentation for Older Emergency Department Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.老年急诊科患者的预立医疗计划文件可用性:一项横断面研究。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jan;20(1):74-78. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0243. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Neighborhood Disadvantage, Race and Ethnicity, and Postpartum Depression.邻里劣势、种族和民族与产后抑郁症。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42398.
8
Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status and Prescription Fill Patterns Among Patients With Heart Failure.社区层面的社会经济地位与心力衰竭患者的处方配药模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47519.
9
Advance Care Planning for Older Homeless-Experienced Adults: Results from the Health Outcomes of People Experiencing Homelessness in Older Middle Age Study.老年流浪经历者的预先医疗护理计划:中老年经历 homelessness 人群健康结果研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1068-1074. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15417. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Neighborhood Deprivation, Race and Ethnicity, and Prostate Cancer Outcomes Across California Health Care Systems.社区贫困程度、种族和民族与加利福尼亚医疗保健系统中前列腺癌治疗效果的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2852.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-Harming Legal Needs Identified by People with HIV: Data from a Medical-Legal Partnership Study to Improve HIV Care Continuum Outcomes.艾滋病毒感染者确定的有害健康的法律需求:来自一项医疗-法律合作研究的数据,以改善艾滋病毒护理连续结果。
J Med Law Public Health. 2025 Apr-Jun;5(2):626-643. doi: 10.52609/jmlph.v5i2.159. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
2
Decomposition and comparative analysis of urban-rural disparity in attitude towards advance care planning among Chinese adults: A nationwide study.中国成年人对预立医疗照护计划态度的城乡差异分解与比较分析:一项全国性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21298-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding COVID-19 risks and vulnerabilities among black communities in America: the lethal force of syndemics.了解美国黑人群体中的 COVID-19 风险和脆弱性:综合征的致命力量。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;47:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
During COVID-19, Outpatient Advance Care Planning Is Imperative: We Need All Hands on Deck.在新冠疫情期间,门诊预先护理计划势在必行:我们需要全员行动起来。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1395-1397. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16532. Epub 2020 May 14.
3
Variation in COVID-19 Hospitalizations and Deaths Across New York City Boroughs.
Advance personal planning knowledge, attitudes, and participation amongst community-dwelling older people living in regional New South Wales, Australia: A cross-sectional survey.
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的地区居住的社区老年人中提高个人预先规划知识、态度和参与度:一项横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 20;19(8):e0309152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309152. eCollection 2024.
4
Acceptance level of advance care planning and its associated factors among the public: A nationwide survey.公众对预先医疗照护计划的接受程度及其相关因素:一项全国性调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 6;23(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01533-0.
5
Area Socioeconomic Status is Associated with Refusal of Recommended Surgery in Patients with Metastatic Bone and Joint Disease.社会经济地位与转移性骨和关节疾病患者拒绝推荐手术有关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):4882-4893. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15299-5. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
6
Using the Age-Friendly Environment Framework to Assess Advance Care Planning Factors Among Older Adults With Limited Income: A Cross-Sectional, Descriptive Survey Study.利用友好老年环境框架评估低收入老年成年人预先医疗照护计划因素:一项横断面、描述性调查研究。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jul 1;64(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae059.
7
End-of-Life Planning and the Influence of Socioeconomic Status among Black Americans: A Systematic Review.美国黑人的临终规划及社会经济地位的影响:一项系统综述
J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Mar 1;27(1):21-30. doi: 10.14475/jhpc.2024.27.1.21.
8
Life-Stage and Contextual Factors of Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults With Limited Income.经济状况有限的老年群体的预立医疗照护计划的生命阶段和情境因素。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Aug;43(8):1144-1155. doi: 10.1177/07334648241230024. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
9
Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status and Prescription Fill Patterns Among Patients With Heart Failure.社区层面的社会经济地位与心力衰竭患者的处方配药模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347519. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47519.
10
Online Forums as a Tool for Broader Inclusion of Voices on Health Care Communication Experiences and Serious Illness Care: Mixed Methods Study.在线论坛作为更广泛纳入医疗保健沟通体验和重病护理意见的工具:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e48550. doi: 10.2196/48550.
纽约市各行政区的 COVID-19 住院和死亡情况存在差异。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2192-2195. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7197.
4
Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Historical Redlining, and Current Neighborhood Characteristics: Breast, Cervical, Lung, and Colorectal Cancers, Massachusetts, 2001-2015.诊断时的癌症分期、历史上的红线政策和当前社区特征:马萨诸塞州 2001-2015 年的乳腺癌、宫颈癌、肺癌和结肠癌。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;189(10):1065-1075. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa045.
5
The Importance of Addressing Advance Care Planning and Decisions About Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders During Novel Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).在2019年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情期间,重视预先医疗计划及关于不进行心肺复苏医嘱决策的重要性
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1771-1772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4894.
6
Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: an ecological study.加利福尼亚州八个城市中历史住宅红线划定与当前因哮喘急诊就诊率的年龄调整率之间的关联:一项生态学研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):e24-e31. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30241-4.
7
Use of an Ambulatory Patient Portal for Advance Care Planning Engagement.使用门诊患者门户进行预先护理计划参与。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;32(6):925-930. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190016.
8
Population-Based Pragmatic Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care in the University of California Health System.基于人群的实用主义临床试验:在加利福尼亚大学医疗体系的初级保健中进行预先护理计划。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):72-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0142.
9
Health Literacy Matters More Than Experience for Advance Care Planning Knowledge Among Older Adults.健康素养对老年人的预先医疗照护规划知识比经验更重要。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2151-2156. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16129. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
10
Gentrification and Displacement in the San Francisco Bay Area: A Comparison of Measurement Approaches.旧金山湾区的绅士化与居民外迁:测量方法比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 25;16(12):2246. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122246.