Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Automation and Applied Informatics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME), Műegyetem rkp. 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Mol Pharm. 2021 Jan 4;18(1):317-327. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00965. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
This research aimed to compare two solvent-based methods for the preparation of amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) made up of poorly soluble spironolactone and poly(vinylpyrrolidone--vinyl acetate). The same apparatus was used to produce, in continuous mode, drug-loaded electrospun (ES) and spray-dried (SD) materials from dichloromethane and ethanol-containing solutions. The main differences between the two preparation methods were the concentration of the solution and application of high voltage. During electrospinning, a solution with a higher concentration and high voltage was used to form a fibrous product. In contrast, a dilute solution and no electrostatic force were applied during spray drying. Both ASD products showed an amorphous structure according to differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray powder diffraction results. However, the dissolution of the SD sample was not complete, while the ES sample exhibited close to 100% dissolution. The polarized microscopy images and Raman microscopy mapping of the samples highlighted that the SD particles contained crystalline traces, which can initiate precipitation during dissolution. Investigation of the dissolution media with a borescope made the precipitated particles visible while Raman spectroscopy measurements confirmed the appearance of the crystalline active pharmaceutical ingredient. To explain the micro-morphological differences, the shape and size of the prepared samples, the evaporation rate of residual solvents, and the influence of the electrostatic field during the preparation of ASDs had to be considered. This study demonstrated that the investigated factors have a great influence on the dissolution of the ASDs. Consequently, it is worth focusing on the selection of the appropriate ASD preparation method to avoid the deterioration of dissolution properties due to the presence of crystalline traces.
本研究旨在比较两种溶剂型方法制备由难溶性螺内酯和聚(乙烯基吡咯烷酮-醋酸乙烯酯)组成的无定形固体分散体(ASD)。相同的设备用于连续模式下从含二氯甲烷和乙醇的溶液中制备载药电纺(ES)和喷雾干燥(SD)材料。两种制备方法的主要区别在于溶液的浓度和施加高压。在静电纺丝过程中,使用浓度较高和高压的溶液形成纤维状产品。相比之下,在喷雾干燥过程中,使用稀溶液且不施加静电力。根据差示扫描量热法和 X 射线粉末衍射结果,两种 ASD 产品均显示无定形结构。然而,SD 样品的溶解不完全,而 ES 样品的溶解接近 100%。样品的偏光显微镜图像和拉曼显微镜图谱表明,SD 颗粒含有结晶痕迹,这可能在溶解过程中引发沉淀。使用内窥镜检查溶解介质,可使沉淀颗粒可见,而拉曼光谱测量则证实了晶型活性药物成分的出现。为了解释微观形貌差异,必须考虑所制备样品的形状和尺寸、残余溶剂的蒸发速率以及 ASD 制备过程中电场的影响。本研究表明,所研究的因素对 ASD 的溶解有很大影响。因此,值得关注选择合适的 ASD 制备方法,以避免由于存在结晶痕迹而导致溶解性能恶化。