• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄勒冈社区基于证据的步行项目:动起来!幸存者。

An Evidence-Based Walking Program in Oregon Communities: Step It Up! Survivors.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, 3455 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd, Portland, OR 97239. Email:

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Bend, Oregon.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Dec 10;17:E156. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200231.

DOI:10.5888/pcd17.200231
PMID:33301392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7769087/
Abstract

Physical activity can help mitigate the long-term symptoms and side effects of cancer and its treatment, but most cancer survivors are not active enough to achieve these benefits. An evidence-based strategy to promote physical activity among adults is a community group-based walking program. However, many evidence-based programs do not achieve intended population health outcomes because of the challenges of real-world implementation. We used the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation to conceptualize implementation of a capacity-building intervention to support delivery of a community group-based walking program. We adapted an evidence-based guide for community group-based walking programs for cancer survivors and their support network. We provided a capacity-building intervention (technical assistance and small-grant funding) and evaluated this implementation intervention. We assessed effectiveness of the intervention by measuring adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation costs, and penetration through monthly progress reports, site visit observations, interviews, and a final report. Eight organizations received a small grant and technical assistance and implemented Step It Up! Survivors (SIUS). SIUS helped cancer survivors increase their physical activity, establish social connections, and be part of a supportive environment. Despite receiving monthly technical assistance, some grantees experienced challenges in recruiting participants, developing community partnerships, and adhering to the prescribed implementation plan. Implementation facilitators included community partners and specific components (eg, incentives for participants, webinars). Organizations needed different amounts and types of assistance with adaptation and implementation. Overall fidelity to SIUS ranged from 64% to 88%. Some integrated SIUS within existing organizational programming for sustainability. The provision of funding and technical assistance was a successful implementation intervention. Our results suggest a need to better tailor technical assistance while organizations are in the process of adapting, implementing, and sustaining an evidence-based program in their local communities.

摘要

身体活动有助于减轻癌症及其治疗的长期症状和副作用,但大多数癌症幸存者的身体活动量不足,无法从中受益。促进成年人身体活动的循证策略是社区团体步行项目。然而,由于现实实施的挑战,许多循证项目并未实现预期的人群健康结果。我们使用互动系统框架来传播和实施,将概念化的能力建设干预措施付诸实施,以支持社区团体步行项目的交付。我们为癌症幸存者及其支持网络改编了基于社区团体的步行项目的循证指南。我们提供了能力建设干预措施(技术援助和小额赠款资金),并对该实施干预措施进行了评估。我们通过每月进度报告、现场访问观察、访谈和最终报告来衡量采用、可接受性、适当性、可行性、保真度、实施成本和渗透度,从而评估干预措施的有效性。八个组织获得了小额赠款和技术援助,并实施了 Step It Up!Survivors (SIUS)。SIUS 帮助癌症幸存者增加了身体活动量、建立了社会联系并融入了支持性环境。尽管每月都收到技术援助,但一些受赠者在招募参与者、发展社区伙伴关系和遵守规定的实施计划方面遇到了挑战。实施促进者包括社区伙伴和特定组件(例如,参与者的激励措施、网络研讨会)。组织在适应和实施以及可持续性方面需要不同数量和类型的援助。SIUS 的整体保真度范围从 64%到 88%。一些组织将 SIUS 纳入现有的组织计划中以实现可持续性。提供资金和技术援助是一项成功的实施干预措施。我们的结果表明,需要更好地调整技术援助,而组织正在将循证计划适应、实施和维持在其当地社区的过程中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b885/7769087/ddb8c14c0d4c/PCD-17-E156s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b885/7769087/b25a93e9e0ce/PCD-17-E156s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b885/7769087/ddb8c14c0d4c/PCD-17-E156s02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b885/7769087/b25a93e9e0ce/PCD-17-E156s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b885/7769087/ddb8c14c0d4c/PCD-17-E156s02.jpg

相似文献

1
An Evidence-Based Walking Program in Oregon Communities: Step It Up! Survivors.俄勒冈社区基于证据的步行项目:动起来!幸存者。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Dec 10;17:E156. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200231.
2
Testing implementation support for evidence-based programs in community settings: a replication cluster-randomized trial of Getting To Outcomes®.测试社区环境中基于证据的计划实施支持:实施成果导向培训的复制群组随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0825-7.
3
Influence of an Implementation Support Intervention on Barriers and Facilitators to Delivery of a Substance Use Prevention Program.实施支持干预对物质使用预防计划实施的障碍和促进因素的影响。
Prev Sci. 2019 Nov;20(8):1200-1210. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01037-x.
4
Using mixed methods and partnership to develop a program evaluation toolkit for organizations that provide physical activity programs for persons with disabilities.运用混合方法和合作关系,为向残疾人提供体育活动项目的组织开发一个项目评估工具包。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00618-7.
5
Balancing fidelity and adaptation: implementing evidence-based chronic disease prevention programs.平衡忠实性和适应性:实施基于证据的慢性病预防计划。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):348-56. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31826d80eb.
6
Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach.开发基于证据的项目可持续性培训课程:一种群组随机、多阶段方法。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 26;13(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0819-5.
7
Statewide implementation of high-fidelity recovery-oriented ACT: A case study.全州范围内实施高保真的以康复为导向的积极社区治疗:一项案例研究。
Implement Res Pract. 2021 Feb 26;2:2633489521994938. doi: 10.1177/2633489521994938. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Evaluating the implementation of Nuevo Amanecer-II in rural community settings using mixed methods and equity frameworks.运用混合方法和公平框架评估“新曙光二号”在农村社区环境中的实施情况。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;81(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01207-y.
9
Adapting Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Programs for Remote Delivery - Implementation Insights through the RE-AIM Evaluation Framework to Promote Health Equity.适应远程提供的基于证据的跌倒预防计划 - 通过 RE-AIM 评估框架获得实施见解,以促进健康公平。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01519-z. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
10
Adapting an Efficacious Peer-Delivered Physical Activity Program for Survivors of Breast Cancer for Web Platform Delivery: Protocol for a 2-Phase Study.将一项有效的基于同伴的乳腺癌幸存者身体活动项目改编为网络平台交付:一项两阶段研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 19;13:e52494. doi: 10.2196/52494.

引用本文的文献

1
The Contribution of Implementation Evaluation to the Field of Public Health.实施评估对公共卫生领域的贡献。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Nov 2;20:E98. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230323.
2
A natural experiment to determine if FitEx works: Impact of a statewide walking program.一项确定 FitEx 是否有效的自然实验:全州范围内步行计划的影响。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Feb 7;14(2):98-105. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad058.
3
"You're Going to Have to Think a Little Bit Different" Barriers and Facilitators to Using mHealth to Increase Physical Activity among Older, Rural Cancer Survivors.

本文引用的文献

1
Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable.癌症康复者运动指南:国际多学科圆桌会议的共识声明。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2375-2390. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116.
2
Evaluability assessment of "growing healthy communities," a mini-grant program to improve access to healthy foods and places for physical activity.“健康社区成长”小型赠款计划的评估,该计划旨在改善获得健康食品和体育活动场所的机会。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 20;19(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7156-8.
3
Technical Assistance and Changes in Nutrition and Physical Activity Practices in the National Early Care and Education Learning Collaboratives Project, 2015-2016.
“你得换个角度思考问题”——利用移动医疗提高老年农村癌症幸存者身体活动水平的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178929.
4
Environmental Factors Associated with Physical Activity in Rural U.S. Counties.农村美国县体力活动相关的环境因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;18(14):7688. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147688.
2015-2016 年国家早期儿童保育和教育学习合作项目中的技术援助和营养与身体活动实践的变化。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Apr 26;15:E47. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170239.
4
Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review.癌症患者的运动:一项系统综述。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Aug;24(4):e290-e315. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3619. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Invasive Cancer Incidence, 2004-2013, and Deaths, 2006-2015, in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties - United States.2004 - 2013年美国非都市和都市县的侵袭性癌症发病率以及2006 - 2015年的死亡情况
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Jul 7;66(14):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6614a1.
6
Challenges of Rural Cancer Care in the United States.美国农村癌症护理面临的挑战。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2015 Sep;29(9):633-40.
7
Leader Behaviors, Group Cohesion, and Participation in a Walking Group Program.领导者行为、群体凝聚力与步行群体项目中的参与度
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.019.
8
What strategies are used to build practitioners' capacity to implement community-based interventions and are they effective?: a systematic review.为增强从业者实施社区干预措施的能力采用了哪些策略,这些策略是否有效?一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2015 May 29;10:80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0272-7.
9
A qualitative examination of the impact of microgrants to promote physical activity among adolescents.一项关于小额赠款对促进青少年身体活动影响的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 22;14:1206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1206.
10
Physical activity and cancer survivorship.身体活动与癌症幸存者
Nutr Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;29(6):768-79. doi: 10.1177/0884533614551969. Epub 2014 Oct 21.