Department of Philosophy, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2021 May;57(2):194-212. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.22071. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Contemporary discussions about operational definition often hark back to Stanley S. Stevens' classic papers on psychological operationism. Still, he was far from the only psychologist to call for conceptual hygiene. Some of Stevens' direct colleagues at Harvard-most notably B. F. Skinner and E. G. Boring-were also actively applying Bridgman's conceptual strictures to the study of mind and behavior. In this paper, I shed new light on the history of operationism by reconstructing the Harvard debates about operational definition in the years before Stevens published his seminal articles. Building on a large set of archival evidence from the Harvard University Archives, I argue that we can get a more complete understanding of Stevens' contributions if we better grasp the operationisms of his former teachers and direct colleagues at Harvard's Department of Philosophy and Psychology.
当代关于操作性定义的讨论常常回溯到斯坦利·S·史蒂文斯关于心理学操作主义的经典论文。尽管如此,他远非唯一呼吁概念卫生的心理学家。史蒂文斯在哈佛的一些直接同事——尤其是 B.F.斯金纳和 E.G.波林——也在积极地将布里奇曼的概念约束应用于对思维和行为的研究。在本文中,我通过重构史蒂文斯发表开创性文章之前哈佛关于操作性定义的辩论,为操作主义的历史提供了新的视角。基于哈佛大学档案馆的大量档案证据,我认为,如果我们更好地理解史蒂文斯在哈佛哲学系和心理学系的前任教师和直接同事的操作主义,我们就能更全面地理解史蒂文斯的贡献。