Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jan;49(1):15-25. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21478. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
The transition to online learning in spring 2020 was abrupt for both students and instructors. While many instructors moved to asynchronous classes, some institutions relied more heavily on synchronous online courses. Here, we evaluate student perceptions of an inquiry-based molecular biology lecture and lab course following this transition by comparing student survey responses from spring 2019, when the lecture and lab were fully in person, to spring 2020, when the lecture and lab started in person before transitioning to a synchronous online format. Students were asked to identify the main factors that supported their learning in lecture and lab, characterize the main barriers to learning in those courses, and discuss their preference of having an inquiry-based lab or a traditional "cookbook" lab with pre-determined answers. We coded these responses and provide one of the first studies to examine the impact of this online transition on student perceptions of learning in an inquiry-based molecular biology lecture and lab course.
2020 年春季,学生和教师都突然开始了在线学习。虽然许多教师转向了异步课程,但一些机构更依赖于同步在线课程。在这里,我们通过比较 2019 年春季(讲座和实验完全面对面进行)和 2020 年春季(讲座和实验开始时面对面进行,然后过渡到同步在线模式)的学生调查回复,评估了学生对基于探究的分子生物学讲座和实验课程的看法。学生被要求确定支持他们在讲座和实验中学习的主要因素,描述在这些课程中学习的主要障碍,并讨论他们对基于探究的实验或具有预定答案的传统“食谱”实验的偏好。我们对这些回复进行了编码,并提供了首批研究之一,以检验这种在线过渡对学生对基于探究的分子生物学讲座和实验课程的学习的看法的影响。