Hong Sanghee, Rybicki Lisa, Corrigan Donna, Hamilton Betty K, Sobecks Ronald, Kalaycio Matt, Gerds Aaron T, Dean Rob M, Hill Brian T, Pohlman Brad, Jagadeesh Deepa, Anwer Faiz, Majhail Navneet S
Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2021 Dec;14(4):318-326. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Relapse is the most common cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). No standard of care exists, and a wide range of treatments are used for post-alloHCT relapse. In the recent era, several novel therapies including targeted agents are available for acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
We reviewed outcomes after alloHCT relapse, with or without use of these newer agents for ALL, AML, and MDS. In total, 115 adults with relapsed or refractory ALL (n = 17), AML (n = 67), and MDS (n = 31) at median 5 (range, 1-64) months after their first alloHCT in 2010-2018 were included.
Median follow-up was 19 (range, 6-80) months after relapse from alloHCT. Targeted agents were given to 29 (25%) patients. In multivariable analysis, use of targeted agent at any time point after relapse was not associated with survival. Matched unrelated (vs. matched sibling; hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; p = .027) or haploidentical donor grafts (vs. matched sibling; HR 2.69; p = .003), presence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease before relapse (HR 2.46; p < .001), and less than 12 months from HCT to relapse (<6 vs. > 12 months; HR 6.34; p < .001; 6-12 vs. > 12 months; HR 3.16; p = .005) were adverse prognostic factors for post-relapse survival.
Outcomes after alloHCT relapse remain poor regardless of the novel agent use. Innovative treatment strategies are needed to improve outcomes after relapse post-alloHCT.
目的/背景:复发是异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)后治疗失败的最常见原因。目前尚无标准的治疗方案,alloHCT后复发的治疗方法多种多样。近年来,包括靶向药物在内的几种新型疗法可用于治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)、急性髓系白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)。
我们回顾了alloHCT复发后的治疗结果,无论是否使用这些新型药物治疗ALL、AML和MDS。总共纳入了115例在2010年至2018年首次alloHCT后中位时间为5(范围1-64)个月出现复发或难治性ALL(n = 17)、AML(n = 67)和MDS(n = 31)的成人患者。
从alloHCT复发后的中位随访时间为19(范围6-80)个月。29例(25%)患者接受了靶向药物治疗。在多变量分析中,复发后任何时间点使用靶向药物与生存率无关。匹配的无关供者(与匹配的同胞供者相比;风险比[HR] 1.70;p = 0.027)或单倍体相合供者移植物(与匹配的同胞供者相比;HR 2.69;p = 0.003)、复发前存在II-IV级急性移植物抗宿主病(HR 2.46;p < 0.001)以及从HCT到复发少于12个月(<6个月与>12个月相比;HR 6.34;p < 0.001;6-12个月与>12个月相比;HR 3.16;p = 0.005)是复发后生存的不良预后因素。
无论是否使用新型药物,alloHCT复发后的治疗结果仍然很差。需要创新的治疗策略来改善alloHCT复发后的治疗结果。