School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300350, China.
School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 20;756:143983. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143983. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
As an alternative to triclosan (TCS), the widespread use of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in daily products shows genuine potential. However, information regarding whether AgNPs are substantially better than TCS in their potential disruption of the gut microbiome and health effects is lacking. Using a simulator of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem (SHIME), we systemically compared the effects of TCS and AgNPs (at 1 μg/L and 30 μg/L) on the human gut microbiome in terms of changes in gut homeostasis, microbial community structure, antibiotic resistance profiles and abundances of opportunistic pathogens. Generally, TCS exerted more severe effects than AgNPs on gut disturbances (i.e., decreased production of short-chain fatty acids, increased contents of ammonium and total bile acids, and increased β-glucosidase activities) in a dose-dependent manner, whereas no clear dose effect was observed for the AgNP treatment because of potential nanoparticle transformation. The more serious effect of TCS than AgNPs on the microbiota composition was indicated by the dynamic increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio determined using 16S rDNA sequencing. Metagenomic analyses revealed a more pronounced effect of TCS than AgNPs on the selection and dissemination of multiple resistance genes to antibiotics, TCS, and even Ag via the enrichment of genes encoding efflux pumps and mobile genetic elements. Consequently, the overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens was observed upon TCS exposure due to an imbalanced microbiome, in contrast to a slight increase in the abundance of some beneficial bacteria (i.e., Bifidobacterium) induced by the AgNP treatment. In conclusion, from the perspective of effects on gut health, AgNPs may prevail over TCS to some extent. However, the stress and potential selection of Ag resistance indicates the need for targeted surveillance of AgNP commercialization for daily use.
作为三氯生(TCS)的替代品,银纳米粒子(AgNPs)在日常产品中的广泛使用显示出了真正的潜力。然而,关于 AgNPs 是否在破坏肠道微生物组和健康影响方面实质上优于 TCS 的信息还很缺乏。本研究使用人类肠道微生物生态系统模拟器(SHIME),系统比较了 TCS 和 AgNPs(1μg/L 和 30μg/L)对人类肠道微生物组的影响,包括肠道内稳态、微生物群落结构、抗生素耐药谱和机会性病原体丰度的变化。一般来说,TCS 比 AgNPs 更能引起肠道紊乱(即短链脂肪酸生成减少、铵和总胆汁酸含量增加、β-葡萄糖苷酶活性增加),且这种作用呈剂量依赖性,而 AgNP 处理则没有明显的剂量效应,这可能是由于纳米颗粒的转化。16S rDNA 测序结果表明,TCS 对微生物群落组成的影响比 AgNPs 更严重,这体现在厚壁菌门/拟杆菌门比值的动态增加。宏基因组分析显示,TCS 比 AgNPs 对多种抗生素、TCS 甚至 Ag 的耐药基因的选择和传播有更显著的影响,这是通过增加编码外排泵和可移动遗传元件的基因来实现的。因此,由于微生物组失衡,TCS 暴露会导致机会性病原体过度生长,而 AgNP 处理则会导致一些有益细菌(如双歧杆菌)的丰度略有增加。总之,从肠道健康的角度来看,AgNPs 在某种程度上可能优于 TCS。然而,Ag 耐药的压力和潜在选择表明,需要对 AgNP 商业化用于日常使用进行有针对性的监测。