Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;76(24):2803-2813. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.021.
Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) are at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. However, it remains unclear whether the high risk is due to high atherosclerotic disease burden or if presence of stenosis has independent predictive value.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate if obstructive CAD provides predictive value beyond its association with total calcified atherosclerotic plaque burden as assessed by coronary artery calcium (CAC).
Among 23,759 symptomatic patients from the Western Denmark Heart Registry who underwent diagnostic computed tomography angiography (CTA), we assessed the risk of major CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause death) stratified by CAC burden and number of vessels with obstructive disease.
During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 1,054 patients experienced a first major CVD event. The event rate increased stepwise with both higher CAC scores and number of vessels with obstructive disease (by CAC scores: 6.2 per 1,000 person-years (PY) for CAC = 0 to 42.3 per 1,000 PY for CAC >1,000; by number of vessels with obstructive disease: 6.1 per 1,000 PY for no CAD to 34.7 per 1,000 PY for 3-vessel disease). When stratified by 5 groups of CAC scores (0, 1 to 99, 100 to 399, 400 to 1,000, and >1,000), the presence of obstructive CAD was not associated with higher risk than presence of nonobstructive CAD.
Plaque burden, not stenosis per se, is the main predictor of risk for CVD events and death. Thus, patients with a comparable calcified atherosclerosis burden generally carry a similar risk for CVD events regardless of whether they have nonobstructive or obstructive CAD.
患有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者发生心血管疾病(CVD)事件的风险很高。然而,目前尚不清楚这种高风险是由于动脉粥样硬化疾病负担高,还是狭窄的存在具有独立的预测价值。
本研究旨在评估阻塞性 CAD 是否提供了比其与冠状动脉钙(CAC)评估的总钙化动脉粥样硬化斑块负担相关的预测价值。
在接受诊断性计算机断层血管造影术(CTA)的 23759 名有症状的丹麦西部心脏登记处患者中,我们根据 CAC 负担和阻塞性疾病血管数量评估了主要 CVD(心肌梗死、中风和全因死亡)的风险分层。
在中位随访 4.3 年期间,有 1054 名患者发生了首次主要 CVD 事件。事件发生率随着 CAC 评分和阻塞性疾病血管数量的增加而逐步增加(按 CAC 评分:CAC = 0 至 42.3/1000 人年,CAC > 1000;按阻塞性疾病血管数量:无 CAD 为 6.1/1000 人年,3 血管疾病为 34.7/1000 人年)。当按 CAC 评分(0、1 至 99、100 至 399、400 至 1000 和 > 1000)分为 5 组时,阻塞性 CAD 的存在与非阻塞性 CAD 相比,与更高的风险无关。
斑块负担而不是狭窄本身是 CVD 事件和死亡风险的主要预测因素。因此,具有相似钙化动脉粥样硬化负担的患者一般具有相似的 CVD 事件风险,无论他们是否患有非阻塞性或阻塞性 CAD。