Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Mar 1;27(5):1381-1390. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3201. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Management of patients with cancer, specifically carboplatin dosing, requires accurate knowledge of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Direct measurement of GFR is resource limited. Available models for estimated GFR (eGFR) are optimized for patients without cancer and either isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)- or non-IDMS-standardized creatinine measurements. We present an eGFR model for patients with cancer compatible with both creatinine measurement methods.
GFR measurements, biometrics, and IDMS- or non-IDMS-standardized creatinine values were collected for adult patients from three cancer centers. Using statistical modeling, an IDMS and non-IDMS creatinine-compatible eGFR model (CamGFR v2) was developed. Its performance was compared with that of the existing models Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), Lund-Malmö revised, and CamGFR v1, using statistics for bias, precision, accuracy, and clinical robustness.
A total of 3,083 IDMS- and 4,612 non-IDMS-standardized creatinine measurements were obtained from 7,240 patients. IDMS-standardized creatinine values were lower than non-IDMS-standardized values in within-center comparisons (13.8% lower in Cambridge; < 0.0001 and 19.3% lower in Manchester; < 0.0001), and more consistent between centers. CamGFR v2 was the most accurate [root-mean-squared error for IDMS, 14.97 mL/minute (95% confidence interval, 13.84-16.13) and non-IDMS, 15.74 mL/minute (14.86-16.63)], most clinically robust [proportion with >20% error of calculated carboplatin dose for IDMS, 0.12 (0.09-0.14) and non-IDMS, 0.17 (0.15-0.2)], and least biased [median residual for IDMS, 0.73 mL/minute (-0.68 to 2.2) and non-IDMS, -0.43 mL/minute (-1.48 to 0.91)] eGFR model, particularly when eGFR was larger than 60 ml/minute.
CamGFR v2 can utilize IDMS- and non-IDMS-standardized creatinine measurements and outperforms previous models. CamGFR v2 should be examined prospectively as a practice-changing standard of care for eGFR-based carboplatin dosing.
癌症患者的管理,特别是卡铂剂量的管理,需要对肾小球滤过率(GFR)有准确的了解。GFR 的直接测量受到资源限制。现有的估算 GFR(eGFR)模型是针对没有癌症的患者和使用同位素稀释质谱法(IDMS)或非 IDMS 标准化肌酐测量的患者进行优化的。我们提出了一种与肌酐测量方法兼容的癌症患者的 eGFR 模型。
从三个癌症中心收集了成年患者的 GFR 测量值、生物标志物以及 IDMS 或非 IDMS 标准化的肌酐值。使用统计建模,开发了一种与 IDMS 和非 IDMS 肌酐兼容的 eGFR 模型(CamGFR v2)。使用统计学方法比较了其与现有的模型(慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)、改良肾脏病饮食研究(MDRD)、全年龄谱(FAS)、隆德-马尔默修订版和 CamGFR v1)的性能,包括偏差、精度、准确性和临床稳健性。
从 7240 名患者中获得了 3083 个 IDMS 标准化和 4612 个非 IDMS 标准化的肌酐测量值。在中心内比较中,IDMS 标准化的肌酐值低于非 IDMS 标准化的肌酐值(剑桥低 13.8%;<0.0001,曼彻斯特低 19.3%;<0.0001),并且在中心之间更一致。CamGFR v2 是最准确的[eGFR 的均方根误差为 IDMS,14.97 毫升/分钟(95%置信区间,13.84-16.13)和非 IDMS,15.74 毫升/分钟(14.86-16.63)],最具临床稳健性[计算卡铂剂量误差>20%的比例为 IDMS,0.12(0.09-0.14)和非 IDMS,0.17(0.15-0.2)],并且偏差最小[eGFR 的中位数残留值为 IDMS,0.73 毫升/分钟(-0.68 至 2.2)和非 IDMS,-0.43 毫升/分钟(-1.48 至 0.91)]eGFR 模型,特别是当 eGFR 大于 60 毫升/分钟时。
CamGFR v2 可以利用 IDMS 和非 IDMS 标准化的肌酐测量值,并且表现优于以前的模型。应前瞻性检查 CamGFR v2,作为基于 eGFR 的卡铂剂量的改变实践的护理标准。