Watkins Adam, Tompsett Carolyn, Diggins Eileen, Pratt Mercedes
Criminal Justice Program, Bowling Green State University, United States.
Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, United States.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Jul;114. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105028. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Functional Family Therapy (FFT) is generally recognized as an effective intervention for court-involved youth. Relatively few studies, however, have focused on the delivery of FFT among youth offenders, especially among older minority youth located at the "deep end" of the juvenile justice system. This research adds to this sparse literature by focusing on the voluntary uptake and continuation of FFT among such youth ( = 60) in Lucas County, Ohio. Most of these youth were Black males nearing adult age who were referred to FFT while in residential placement or on probation. Getting these youth to start and advance in therapy proved a considerable challenge, with only 28% of referred youth making it to the final phase of FFT. Multiple group meetings and an interview with court and treatment practitioners brought to light various factors viewed by these personnel as inhibiting uptake and retention. These factors serve as potential lessons that other jurisdictions can learn from and have implications for future research on FFT that are discussed. These lessons learned include (1) setting an expected rate of uptake and retention that reflects the risk profile of referred youth; (2) considering whether to deliver FFT alone or in combination with other services; (3) devising ways to incentivize uptake and retention; (4) formalizing FFT eligibility or referral criteria; and (5) weighing whether to exclude certain youth or families from FFT due to factors such as guardian turnover.
功能家庭治疗(FFT)通常被认为是一种针对涉及法庭的青少年的有效干预措施。然而,相对较少的研究关注在青少年罪犯中实施FFT,特别是在处于少年司法系统“最末端”的年长少数族裔青少年中。本研究聚焦于俄亥俄州卢卡斯县此类青少年(n = 60)对FFT的自愿接受和持续参与情况,从而丰富了这一稀少的文献资料。这些青少年大多是接近成年的黑人男性,他们在被安置在寄宿机构或缓刑期间被转介接受FFT。事实证明,让这些青少年开始并推进治疗是一项相当大的挑战,只有28%的被转介青少年进入了FFT的最后阶段。多次小组会议以及对法庭和治疗从业者的访谈揭示了这些人员认为阻碍接受和持续参与治疗的各种因素。这些因素可作为其他司法管辖区可以借鉴的潜在经验教训,并且对FFT未来的研究具有启示意义,本文对此进行了讨论。这些经验教训包括:(1)设定反映被转介青少年风险状况的接受和持续参与预期比率;(2)考虑单独提供FFT还是与其他服务相结合;(3)设计激励接受和持续参与的方法;(4)使FFT的资格或转介标准正规化;(5)权衡是否因监护人更替等因素将某些青少年或家庭排除在FFT之外。