Department of Criminology & Criminal Justice, 2220 LeFrak Hall, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
The Institute for Innovation and Implementation, University of Maryland School of Social Work, 306 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Prev Sci. 2018 Oct;19(7):939-953. doi: 10.1007/s11121-018-0936-z.
The Affordable Care Act expanded access to Medicaid programs and required them to provide essential health benefits, which can include prevention services. This study assesses the costs and benefits to using Medicaid funding to implement a well-known evidence-based program, Functional Family Therapy (FFT), with a sample of juvenile justice-involved youth. The study also provides a rigorous test of FFT accommodated for a contemporary urban population that is gang at risk or gang-involved. One hundred twenty-nine predominantly minority and low income families were randomly assigned to receive an enhanced version of FFT or an alternative family therapy. Data from pre- and post-intervention interviews with youth and parents, court records of contacts with the justice system and residential placements, official records of community services, and the costs of placements and services are summarized. The intervention was implemented with fidelity to the FFT model using Medicaid funding. Treatment and control subjects received a wide range of community and residential services in addition to FFT. A higher percentage of treatment subjects than controls received services following random assignment, but the cost per youth served was lower for treatment than control youth, primarily because control youth were more often placed in residential facilities. Recidivism during the 18-month follow-up period was lower for FFT than for control youth. The combination of cost savings realized from avoiding more costly services and the expected future savings due to recidivism reduction suggest the expanded use of evidence-based practices using public funding streams such as Medicaid is warranted.
平价医疗法案扩大了医疗补助计划的覆盖范围,并要求这些计划提供基本的健康福利,其中包括预防服务。本研究评估了利用医疗补助资金实施一项广为人知的循证计划——功能家庭疗法(FFT)的成本和收益,该计划的样本是涉及青少年司法的青年。该研究还为功能家庭疗法适应当代有帮派风险或涉及帮派的城市人口提供了严格的测试。129 个主要由少数族裔和低收入家庭组成的家庭被随机分配接受强化版功能家庭疗法或替代家庭疗法。在干预前后对青少年和家长进行的访谈、与司法系统的接触和住宿安置的法庭记录、社区服务的官方记录以及安置和服务的成本都进行了总结。该干预措施是在利用医疗补助资金实施功能家庭疗法模型的基础上进行的。治疗组和对照组除了接受功能家庭疗法外,还接受了广泛的社区和住宿服务。与对照组相比,更多的治疗组在随机分配后接受了服务,但每位接受治疗的青少年的服务费用比对照组的青少年低,主要是因为对照组的青少年更经常被安置在住宿设施中。在 18 个月的随访期间,接受功能家庭疗法治疗的青少年的累犯率低于对照组。从避免成本更高的服务中实现的节省成本以及因累犯减少而带来的预期未来节省的结合表明,使用公共资金流(如医疗补助)扩大循证实践的使用是合理的。