Corwin Gregory S, Sexton Kevin W, Beck William C, Taylor John R, Bhavaraju Avi, Davis Benjamin, Kimbrough Mary K, Jensen Joseph C, Privratsky Anna, Robertson Rotnald D
Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jul-Sep;13(3):213-218. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_45_19. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Recent data suggest that acidosis alone is not a good predictor of mortality in trauma patients. Little data are currently available regarding factors associated with survival in trauma patients presenting with acidosis.
The aims were to characterize the outcomes of trauma patients presenting with acidosis and to identify modifiable risk factors associated with mortality in these patients.
This is a retrospective observational study of University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) trauma patients between November 23, 2013, and May 21, 2017.
Data were collected from the UAMS trauma registry. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Analyses were performed using t-test and Pearson's Chi-squared test. Simple and multiple logistic regressions were performed to determine crude and adjusted odds ratios.
There were 532 patients identified and 64.7% were acidotic (pH < 7.35) on presentation: 75.9% pH 7.2-7.35; 18.5% pH 7.0-7.2; and 5.6% pH ≤ 7.0. The total hospital mortality was 23.7%. Nonsurvivors were older and more acidotic, with a base deficit >-8, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8, systolic blood pressure ≤ 90, International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.6, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) >15. Mortality was significantly higher with a pH ≤ 7.2 but mortality with a pH 7.2-7.35 was comparable to pH > 7.35. In the adjusted model, pH ≤ 7.0, pH 7.0-7.2, INR > 1.6, GCS ≤ 8, and ISS > 15 were associated with increased mortality. For patients with a pH ≤ 7.2, only INR was associated with increase in mortality.
A pH ≤ 7.2 is associated with increased mortality. For patients in this range, only the presence of coagulopathy is associated with increased mortality. A pH > 7.2 may be an appropriate treatment goal for acidosis. Further work is needed to identify and target potentially modifiable factors in patients with acidosis such as coagulopathy.
近期数据表明,单纯酸中毒并非创伤患者死亡率的良好预测指标。目前关于酸中毒创伤患者生存相关因素的数据较少。
旨在描述酸中毒创伤患者的预后情况,并确定这些患者中与死亡率相关的可改变风险因素。
这是一项对阿肯色大学医学科学分校(UAMS)2013年11月23日至2017年5月21日期间创伤患者的回顾性观察研究。
从UAMS创伤登记处收集数据。主要结局是医院死亡率。采用t检验和Pearson卡方检验进行分析。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归以确定粗比值比和调整后的比值比。
共识别出532例患者,其中64.7%在就诊时存在酸中毒(pH < 7.35):75.9%的患者pH为7.2 - 7.35;18.5%的患者pH为7.0 - 7.2;5.6%的患者pH≤7.0。医院总死亡率为23.7%。未存活者年龄更大且酸中毒程度更严重,碱缺失 > -8,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)≤8,收缩压≤90,国际标准化比值(INR)> 1.6,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)> 15。pH≤7.2时死亡率显著更高,但pH为7.2 - 7.35时的死亡率与pH > 7.35时相当。在调整模型中,pH≤7.0、pH 7.0 - 7.2、INR > 1.6、GCS≤8和ISS > 15与死亡率增加相关。对于pH≤