Papp B
National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020 Sep 30;33(3):253-261.
Disaster myths pose a great challenge in disaster risk management all over the world. These misconceptions mean barriers to disaster higher education as well. This research is designed to examine these beliefs among disaster management students at the National University of Public Service, Hungary, as well as in a control group compiled from students from three other Hungarian universities. Based on the methodology of research published by David Alexander, a questionnaire was edited with 19 false statements about disaster events. Respondents had to evaluate them on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means "completely disagree" and 5 means "completely agree". Strong agreement was expressed for some of the misconceptions regarding disasters (e.g. unburied bodies constitute a serious health hazard), and to a lesser degree for others (e.g. disasters cannot be managed systematically). The results of the control group reached similar values to those of the test groups, however in some cases the former tend to be more skeptical about the statements. Although Hungarian students shared the same beliefs as US and Italian students, the Hungarians seem to be less critical of the statements. These disaster myths create a serious problem in disaster higher education and have a great impact on future disaster managers in the field.
在全球范围内,灾难神话给灾害风险管理带来了巨大挑战。这些误解也意味着灾害高等教育的障碍。本研究旨在调查匈牙利公共服务大学灾害管理专业学生以及由其他三所匈牙利大学学生组成的对照组中的这些观念。基于大卫·亚历山大发表的研究方法,编制了一份包含19条关于灾害事件的错误陈述的问卷。受访者必须按照从1到5的李克特量表对这些陈述进行评估,其中1表示“完全不同意”,5表示“完全同意”。对于一些关于灾害的误解(例如,未掩埋的尸体构成严重健康危害),受访者表示强烈认同,而对于其他一些误解(例如,灾害无法系统管理),认同程度较低。对照组的结果与测试组相似,然而在某些情况下,前者对这些陈述往往更为怀疑。尽管匈牙利学生与美国和意大利学生持有相同的观念,但匈牙利人对这些陈述的批判性似乎较低。这些灾难神话在灾害高等教育中造成了严重问题,并对该领域未来的灾害管理者产生了重大影响。