• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to Effectively Encourage Sustainable Food Choices: A Mini-Review of Available Evidence.如何有效鼓励可持续的食物选择:现有证据的小型综述
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;11:589674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589674. eCollection 2020.
2
Nudging to get our food choices on a sustainable track.引导我们的食物选择走向可持续轨道。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2020 Feb;79(1):133-146. doi: 10.1017/S0029665119000971. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
Under pressure: Nudging increases healthy food choice in a virtual reality supermarket, irrespective of system 1 reasoning.压力之下:在虚拟现实超市中,无论系统 1 推理如何,推动都会增加健康食品的选择。
Appetite. 2021 May 1;160:105116. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105116. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
4
Interventions to promote healthy eating choices when dining out: A systematic review of reviews.外出就餐时促进健康饮食选择的干预措施:系统评价综述。
Br J Health Psychol. 2018 May;23(2):278-295. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12285. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
5
Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.消费者对有机食品和本地食品可持续性属性的认知
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2018;9(2):87-96. doi: 10.2174/2212798410666171215112058.
6
Environmentally Sustainable Food Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda From a Goal-Directed Perspective.环境可持续性食品消费:基于目标导向视角的综述与研究议程
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 10;11:1603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01603. eCollection 2020.
7
How do defaults and framing influence food choice? An intervention aimed at promoting plant-based choice in online menus.默认选项和框架如何影响食物选择?一项旨在促进在线菜单中选择植物性食物的干预措施。
Appetite. 2023 Nov 1;190:107005. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.107005. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
8
Perceptions of social norms around healthy and environmentally-friendly food choices: Linking the role of referent groups to behavior.对健康和环保食品选择的社会规范认知:将参照群体的作用与行为联系起来。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:974830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974830. eCollection 2022.
9
Eating like there's no tomorrow: Public awareness of the environmental impact of food and reluctance to eat less meat as part of a sustainable diet.吃得就像没有明天一样:公众对食物环境影响的认知以及作为可持续饮食一部分少吃肉的不情愿。
Appetite. 2016 Jan 1;96:487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Under consumers' scrutiny - an investigation into consumers' attitudes and concerns about nudging in the realm of health behavior.在消费者审视之下——关于消费者对健康行为领域助推的态度及担忧的调查
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 9;15:336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1691-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining mechanisms of action with behavior change techniques-theory-based development of an app promoting heating energy-saving behaviors.将行动机制与行为改变技巧相结合——一款促进热能节约行为的应用程序的基于理论的开发。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1534014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534014. eCollection 2025.
2
Ego depletion and its role regarding the attitudes and behavior toward sustainable food consumption.自我损耗及其在可持续食品消费态度和行为方面的作用。
Front Nutr. 2025 May 8;12:1469301. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1469301. eCollection 2025.
3
Perceived food value depends on display format, preference strength, and physical accessibility.感知到的食物价值取决于展示形式、偏好强度和实际可获取性。
Appetite. 2025 May 1;209:107973. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.107973. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
4
Evaluation of nutritional, anthropometric, and psychological outcomes in different metabolic and bariatric surgery techniques: a follow up study.不同代谢和减重手术技术的营养、人体测量及心理结果评估:一项随访研究
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02773-4.
5
Effects of public policy interventions for environmentally sustainable food consumption: a systematic map of available evidence.促进环境可持续性食品消费的公共政策干预措施的效果:现有证据的系统图谱
Environ Evid. 2024 Apr 12;13(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13750-024-00333-6.
6
What evidence exists on the effects of public policy interventions for achieving environmentally sustainable food consumption? A systematic map protocol.关于公共政策干预措施对实现环境可持续性食品消费的影响,有哪些证据?一项系统综述方案。
Environ Evid. 2022 Apr 25;11(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13750-022-00271-1.
7
Investigating intervention components and their effectiveness in promoting environmentally sustainable diets: a systematic review.研究促进环境可持续饮食的干预措施及其有效性:系统评价。
Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Jun;8(6):e410-e422. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00064-0.
8
PO2/TransformON, an ontology for data integration on food, feed, bioproducts and biowaste engineering.PO2/TransformON,一个用于食品、饲料、生物产品和生物废弃物工程数据整合的本体。
NPJ Sci Food. 2023 Sep 4;7(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41538-023-00221-2.
9
An exploration of nudging towards transformative environmental behaviour changes prior to a values-crystallization event.在价值观形成事件之前推动变革性环境行为改变的探索。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 26;9(8):e18689. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18689. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Current dietary intake of the Japanese population in reference to the planetary health diet-preliminary assessment.日本人群当前饮食摄入量与地球健康饮食的对照——初步评估
Front Nutr. 2023 Apr 3;10:1116105. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1116105. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Susceptibility to social influence predicts behavior on Facebook.社交影响力的易感性预测了在 Facebook 上的行为。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 3;15(3):e0229337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229337. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias.增加素食供应对自助餐厅用餐选择和销售的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):20923-20929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907207116. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
3
Social-Cultural Processes and Urban Affordances for Healthy and Sustainable Food Consumption.促进健康与可持续食品消费的社会文化进程及城市便利条件
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 6;9:2407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02407. eCollection 2018.
4
Meat consumption, health, and the environment.肉类消费、健康与环境。
Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324.
5
Normative prompts reduce consumer food waste in restaurants.规范性提示可减少餐厅的消费者食物浪费。
Waste Manag. 2018 Jul;77:532-536. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.047. Epub 2018 May 3.
6
Using Behavioural Insights to Promote Food Waste Recycling in Urban Households-Evidence From a Longitudinal Field Experiment.运用行为洞察促进城市家庭食物垃圾回收利用——来自一项纵向实地实验的证据
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 22;9:352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00352. eCollection 2018.
7
How effective are messages and their characteristics in changing behavioural intentions to substitute plant-based foods for red meat? The mediating role of prior beliefs.信息及其特征在改变用植物性食物替代红色肉类的行为意向方面的效果如何?先验信念的中介作用。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
(Not) Eating for the environment: The impact of restaurant menu design on vegetarian food choice.(不)为环境而食:餐厅菜单设计对素食选择的影响。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative.动态规范促进可持续行为,即使这种行为与规范背道而驰。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1663-1674. doi: 10.1177/0956797617719950. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
A problem unstuck? Evaluating the effectiveness of sticker prompts for encouraging household food waste recycling behaviour.解决问题了吗?评估贴纸提示对鼓励家庭食物垃圾回收行为的有效性。
Waste Manag. 2017 Feb;60:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

如何有效鼓励可持续的食物选择:现有证据的小型综述

How to Effectively Encourage Sustainable Food Choices: A Mini-Review of Available Evidence.

作者信息

Abrahamse Wokje

机构信息

School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;11:589674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589674. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589674
PMID:33304299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7701282/
Abstract

Food choices are difficult to change. People's individual motivations (such as taste, cost, and food preferences) can be at odds with the negative environmental outcomes of their food choices (such as deforestation, water pollution, and climate change). How then can people be encouraged to adopt more sustainable food choices? This rapid review uses a dual-processing framework of decision-making to structure an investigation of the effectiveness of interventions to encourage sustainable food choices (e.g., local and organic food consumption, reducing meat and dairy intake, reducing food waste) via voluntary behavior change. The review includes interventions that rely on fast, automatic decision-making processes (e.g., nudging) and interventions that rely on more deliberate decision-making (e.g., information provision). These interventions have varying degrees of success in terms of encouraging sustainable food choices. This mini-review outlines some of the ways in which our understanding of sustainable food choices could be enhanced. This includes a call for the inclusion of possible moderators and mediators (past behavior, attitudes, beliefs, values) as part of effect measurements, because these elucidate the mechanisms by which behavior change occurs. In light of the climate change challenge, studies that include long-term effect measurements are essential as these can provide insight on how to foster sustained and durable changes.

摘要

食物选择很难改变。人们的个人动机(如口味、成本和食物偏好)可能与他们食物选择所带来的负面环境后果(如森林砍伐、水污染和气候变化)不一致。那么,如何鼓励人们做出更具可持续性的食物选择呢?本快速综述采用决策的双加工框架,构建了一项关于通过自愿行为改变来鼓励可持续食物选择(如食用本地和有机食品、减少肉类和奶制品摄入、减少食物浪费)的干预措施有效性的调查。该综述包括依赖快速、自动决策过程的干预措施(如助推)和依赖更审慎决策的干预措施(如提供信息)。这些干预措施在鼓励可持续食物选择方面取得了不同程度的成功。本小型综述概述了一些可以增进我们对可持续食物选择理解的方法。这包括呼吁将可能的调节因素和中介因素(过去的行为、态度、信念、价值观)纳入效应测量中,因为这些因素能阐明行为改变发生的机制。鉴于气候变化的挑战,纳入长期效应测量的研究至关重要,因为这些研究可以为如何促进持续和持久的改变提供见解。