Brandt Mara, Bamberg Sebastian
Medical Assistance Systems Group, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Interactive Robotics in Medicine and Care, Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1534014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1534014. eCollection 2025.
There is an ongoing debate whether the currently used psychological interventions to motivate people to switch to more pro-environmental behavioral alternatives are effective. In the present paper the 'theory and technique tool' (TaTT) developed by the Human Behavior Change Project is used to demonstrate the theory-based development of a mobile app promoting heating energy saving behaviors.
For this purpose, from the stage model of self-regulated behavioral change (SSBC) so-called Mechanisms of Action (MoA) are derived mediating the impact of the intervention on behavioral change. The TaTT is then used for linking these MoAs systematically with evidence based 'behavior change techniques' (BCTs).
In a next step, conceptual design ideas are developed as operationalizations of the included BCTs. In an experimental lab study, we test the effectiveness of one central conceptual design idea aiming to motivate participants to use intervention packages specially tailored to the needs which according to the SSBC an intervention has to target in that stage. The results, however, provide little empirical evidence that this design idea works as theoretically expected.
This finding underlines the importance of explicitly testing the ability of conceptual design ideas to activate theoretically proposed MoA-BCT links before the large-scale implementation of that intervention in a costly field study.
目前用于激励人们转向更有利于环保行为选择的心理干预措施是否有效,这一问题仍在争论之中。在本文中,人类行为改变项目开发的“理论与技术工具”(TaTT)被用于展示一款促进供暖节能行为的移动应用程序基于理论的开发过程。
为此,从自我调节行为改变阶段模型(SSBC)中推导所谓的作用机制(MoA),以介导干预对行为改变的影响。然后使用TaTT将这些作用机制与基于证据的“行为改变技术”(BCT)系统地联系起来。
下一步,开发概念设计理念,作为所纳入行为改变技术的操作化形式。在一项实验性实验室研究中,我们测试了一个核心概念设计理念的有效性,该理念旨在激励参与者使用根据SSBC在该阶段干预必须针对的需求量身定制的干预包。然而,结果几乎没有提供实证证据表明这一设计理念如理论预期那样发挥作用。
这一发现凸显了在一项成本高昂的实地研究中大规模实施该干预措施之前,明确测试概念设计理念激活理论上提出的作用机制-行为改变技术联系能力的重要性。