• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Learning Processes as Key for Success in Workplace Health Promotion Interventions in Health Care.学习过程是医疗保健领域工作场所健康促进干预取得成功的关键。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;8:576693. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.576693. eCollection 2020.
2
Leadership in workplace health promotion projects: 1- and 2-year effects on long-term work attendance.工作场所健康促进项目中的领导力:对长期出勤的1年和2年影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2007 Oct;17(5):471-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm004. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
3
Managing workplace health promotion in municipal organizations: The perspective of senior managers.市政组织中的工作场所健康促进管理:高级管理人员的视角。
Work. 2015;53(3):485-98. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152177.
4
The relationship between leadership support, workplace health promotion and employee wellbeing in South Africa.南非领导支持、工作场所健康促进与员工福祉之间的关系。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):514-22. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dat064. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
5
Implementing Organizational WHP Into Practice: Obstructing Paradoxes in the Alignment and Distribution of Empowerment.将组织健康促进付诸实践:在赋权的协调和分配中克服悖论。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;8:579197. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.579197. eCollection 2020.
6
Managers' Perceptions of Factors Affecting Employees' Uptake of Workplace Health Promotion (WHP) Offers.管理者对影响员工接受工作场所健康促进(WHP)提议的因素的认知。
Front Public Health. 2020 May 5;8:145. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00145. eCollection 2020.
7
Navigating change - managers' experience of implementation processes in disability health care: a qualitative study.应对变革——残疾医疗保健实施过程中管理者的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06570-6.
8
A study protocol outlining the development and evaluation of a training program for frontline managers on leading well-being and the psychosocial work environment in Danish hospital settings - a cluster randomized waitlist controlled trial.一份研究方案,概述了为丹麦医院环境中的一线经理制定和评估一项关于领导幸福感和心理社会工作环境培训计划的过程——一项集群随机、等待名单对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 10;23(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15728-2.
9
Organizational Characteristics Influence Implementation of Worksite Health Protection and Promotion Programs: Evidence From Smaller Businesses.组织特征影响工作场所健康保护与促进计划的实施:来自小企业的证据。
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Sep;57(9):1009-16. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000517.
10
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.

引用本文的文献

1
How Conditions and Resources Connected to Digital Management Systems and Remote Work Are Associated with Sustainable Work.工作条件和资源与数字管理系统及远程办公的关联如何影响可持续工作。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 26;19(23):15731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315731.
2
Rural-urban differences in workplace health promotion among employees of small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany.德国中小企业员工城乡工作场所健康促进的差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 21;22(1):681. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08052-9.
3
Reflection on leadership behavior: potentials and limits in the implementation of stress-preventive leadership of middle management in hospitals - a qualitative evaluation of a participatory developed intervention.对领导行为的反思:医院中层管理人员压力预防型领导实施中的潜力与局限——一项参与式开发干预措施的定性评估
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021 Nov 29;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12995-021-00339-7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Leadership and Job Autonomy on Vitality: Survey and Experimental Evidence.领导能力与工作自主性对活力的影响:调查与实验证据
Rev Public Pers Adm. 2018 Sep;38(3):355-377. doi: 10.1177/0734371X16671980. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
2
Work-related stress assessed by a text message single-item stress question.通过短信单项压力问题评估工作相关压力。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Dec 2;67(8):601-608. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx111.
3
Exploring communication processes in workplace meetings: A mixed methods study in a Swedish healthcare organization.探索职场会议中的沟通流程:对瑞典一家医疗保健机构的混合方法研究
Work. 2016 Jul 26;54(3):533-41. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162366.
4
Factors influencing workplace health promotion intervention: a qualitative systematic review.影响工作场所健康促进干预的因素:一项定性系统评价
Health Promot Int. 2017 Oct 1;32(5):831-839. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw015.
5
The Association of Workplace Social Capital With Work Engagement of Employees in Health Care Settings: A Multilevel Cross-Sectional Analysis.医疗环境中工作场所社会资本与员工工作投入的关联:一项多层次横断面分析。
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Mar;58(3):265-71. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000605.
6
Social capital among healthcare professionals: A prospective study of its importance for job satisfaction, work engagement and engagement in clinical improvements.医疗保健专业人员的社会资本:对其工作满意度、工作投入和参与临床改进重要性的前瞻性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan;53:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
7
Integrating health promotion with quality improvement in a Swedish hospital.瑞典一家医院中健康促进与质量改进的整合
Health Promot Int. 2016 Sep;31(3):495-504. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav027. Epub 2015 May 16.
8
Healthcare workers' perceptions of lean: a context-sensitive, mixed methods study in three Swedish hospitals.医护人员对精益理念的认知:一项在瑞典三家医院开展的情境敏感型混合方法研究。
Appl Ergon. 2015 Mar;47:181-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
9
Organizational health in health organizations: towards a conceptualization.卫生组织中的组织健康:迈向一种概念化
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Dec;26(4):796-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.00996.x. Epub 2012 May 10.
10
Managing complex workplace stress in health care organizations: leaders' perceived legitimacy conflicts.管理医疗保健组织中的复杂工作场所压力:领导者感知的合法性冲突。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Dec;17(8):931-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00996.x.

学习过程是医疗保健领域工作场所健康促进干预取得成功的关键。

Learning Processes as Key for Success in Workplace Health Promotion Interventions in Health Care.

作者信息

Eriksson Andrea, Dellve Lotta

机构信息

Division of Ergonomics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Sociology and Work Science, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 10;8:576693. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.576693. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.576693
PMID:33304874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7693428/
Abstract

There is limited previous research on how learning processes contribute to the outcomes of workplace health promotion (WHP) leadership interventions. The aim of this study was to identify the outcomes of a system-based WPH education program for managers and investigated what impact the intervention program had on health-oriented leadership, improvement work, and employee well-being, as well as what factors (i.e., how manager's active work following the intervention and organizational learning climate) contributed to these outcomes. A mixed-methods approach was applied, including qualitative interviews with 23 managers and process leaders, as well as questionnaires to employees and managers representing 17 public health care units in Sweden. The results showed that health-oriented leadership, improvement work, work satisfaction, and vitality increased at workplaces that worked actively to implement WHP following the program. Working actively with WHP and health-oriented leadership was of central importance for success and was a covariate with improved social learning climate, improved developmental leadership, and increased degree of improvement work. All included factors of learning during the intervention were associated with improved job satisfaction, while the increase in vitality seemed unrelated to program implementation. In conclusion, successful outcomes of WHP interventions interact with dimensions of organizational learning climate in the workplace.

摘要

以往关于学习过程如何影响工作场所健康促进(WHP)领导力干预效果的研究有限。本研究旨在确定一项针对管理人员的基于系统的WPH教育项目的效果,并调查该干预项目对以健康为导向的领导力、改进工作和员工福祉有何影响,以及哪些因素(即干预后管理人员的积极工作方式和组织学习氛围)促成了这些结果。采用了混合方法,包括对23名管理人员和流程负责人进行定性访谈,以及向代表瑞典17个公共卫生保健单位的员工和管理人员发放问卷。结果显示,在项目实施后积极开展WHP工作的工作场所,以健康为导向的领导力、改进工作、工作满意度和活力都有所提高。积极开展WHP工作和以健康为导向的领导力对成功至关重要,并且与改善社会学习氛围、提升发展型领导力以及提高改进工作程度相关。干预期间所有包含的学习因素都与工作满意度的提高有关,而活力的增加似乎与项目实施无关。总之,WHP干预的成功结果与工作场所组织学习氛围的维度相互作用。