Suppr超能文献

不同经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)模式对脑电图的调制作用:一项在健康参与者中进行的随机、双盲、假刺激对照的机制性先导试验。

EEG modulation by different transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) montages: a randomized double-blind sham-control mechanistic pilot trial in healthy participants.

机构信息

Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Neurology Department, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.

出版信息

Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Jan;18(1):107-120. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1860018. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

Abstract

: Based on our Phantom study on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we hypothesized that EEG band power and field confinement would be greater following left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC - F3) tDCS using circular vs. rectangular electrodes.: Double-blind-randomized trial comparing tDCS with anode over left DLPFC (groups: rectangular electrodes, circular electrodes, sham) and 2 active subgroup references (right shoulder vs. right DLPFC).: Twenty-four randomized participants were assessed. We indeed found higher average EEG power spectral density (PSD) across bands for circular vs. rectangular electrodes, largely confined to F3 and there was a significant increase at AF3 for low alpha (p = 0.037). Significant differences included: increased PSD in low beta (p = 0.024) and theta bands (p = 0.021) at F3, and in theta (p = 0.036) at FC5 for the right DLPFC vs. shoulder with no coherence changes. We found PSD differences between active vs. sham tDCS at Fz for alpha (p = 0.043), delta (p = 0.036), high delta (p = 0.030); and at FC1 for alpha (p = 0.031), with coherence differences for F3-Fz in beta (p = 0.044), theta (p = 0.044), delta (p = 0.037) and high delta (p = 0.009).: This pilot study despite low statistical power given its small sample size shows that active left DLPFC tDCS modulates EEG frontocentrally and suggests that electrode shapes/reference locations affect its neurophysiological effects, such as increased low alpha power at AF3 using circular vs. rectangular electrodes. Further research with more participants is warranted.

摘要

基于我们关于经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的幻影研究,我们假设使用圆形电极而非矩形电极对左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC-F3)进行 tDCS 后,EEG 频带功率和场限制将更大。:双盲随机试验比较 tDCS 与阳极在左 DLPFC 上方(组:矩形电极、圆形电极、假电极)和 2 个主动亚组参考(右肩与右 DLPFC)。:评估了 24 名随机参与者。我们确实发现圆形电极比矩形电极产生更高的平均 EEG 功率谱密度(PSD),主要局限于 F3,在低阿尔法(p=0.037)处有显著增加。显著差异包括:在 F3 处低β(p=0.024)和θ频段的 PSD 增加(p=0.021),以及右 DLPFC 处θ频段(p=0.036)与肩部相比无相干变化。我们发现 Fz 处活性 vs. 假 tDCS 的 PSD 差异在阿尔法(p=0.043)、德尔塔(p=0.036)、高德尔塔(p=0.030);在 FC1 处阿尔法(p=0.031),β(p=0.044)、θ(p=0.044)、德尔塔(p=0.037)和高德尔塔(p=0.009)的 F3-Fz 处相干性差异。:尽管由于样本量小,统计功效较低,但这项初步研究表明,左 DLPFC 主动 tDCS 调节额前 EEG,并表明电极形状/参考位置会影响其神经生理效应,例如使用圆形电极而非矩形电极在 AF3 处增加低阿尔法功率。需要更多参与者进行进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验