Suppr超能文献

评估针对阿巴拉契亚人群的癌症筛查干预措施的有效性:系统评价。

Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.

Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):602-623. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12550. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Appalachian residents have higher cancer prevalence and invasive cancer incidence in almost all cancer types relative to non-Appalachian residents. Public health interventions have been carried out to increase preventive cancer screening participation. However, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness of existing interventions targeting cancer screening uptake in this high-risk population. The main objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake and/or continuing participation in screened cancers (breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate) in Appalachia.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and gray literature using a combination of MeSH and free-text search terms related to breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; mass screening; health promotion; and Appalachia. We identified 3,014 articles of which 15 articles were included. We assessed methodological quality using validated tools and analyzed findings using narrative synthesis.

FINDINGS

Fifteen studies reported uptake and/or continued participation in screening interventions; these focused on cervical (n = 7), colorectal (n = 5), breast (n = 2), and lung (n = 1) cancers in Appalachia. Interventions included diverse components: mass media campaigns, community outreach events, community health workers, interpersonal counseling, and educational materials. We found that multi-strategy interventions had higher screening uptake relative to interventions employing 1 intervention strategy. Studies that targeted noncompliant populations and leveraged existing community-based organization partnerships had a substantial increase in screening participation versus others.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an urgent need for further research and implementation of effective cancer prevention and screening interventions to reduce disparities in cancer morbidity and mortality in Appalachian populations.

摘要

目的

与非阿巴拉契亚居民相比,阿巴拉契亚居民的各种癌症的患病率和侵袭性癌症发病率都更高。为了提高预防性癌症筛查的参与率,已经开展了公共卫生干预措施。然而,目前还没有研究评估针对这一高危人群的癌症筛查参与度的现有干预措施的效果。本研究的主要目的是评估旨在提高阿巴拉契亚地区筛查癌症(乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌)的参与率和/或继续参与率的干预措施的效果。

方法

我们使用与乳腺癌、宫颈癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和前列腺癌、群体筛查、健康促进和阿巴拉契亚相关的 MeSH 和自由文本搜索词对电子数据库和灰色文献进行了系统评价。我们确定了 3014 篇文章,其中有 15 篇文章被纳入。我们使用经过验证的工具评估了方法学质量,并使用叙述性综合分析方法分析了研究结果。

发现

15 项研究报告了筛查干预措施的参与率和/或继续参与率;这些研究集中在阿巴拉契亚地区的宫颈癌(n = 7)、结直肠癌(n = 5)、乳腺癌(n = 2)和肺癌(n = 1)。干预措施包括多种组成部分:大众媒体宣传活动、社区外展活动、社区卫生工作者、人际咨询和教育材料。我们发现,与采用单一干预策略的干预措施相比,多策略干预措施的筛查参与率更高。针对不遵守规定的人群并利用现有的社区组织伙伴关系的研究,与其他研究相比,筛查参与度有了实质性的提高。

结论

迫切需要进一步研究和实施有效的癌症预防和筛查干预措施,以减少阿巴拉契亚人群癌症发病率和死亡率的差异。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Interventions Targeting Appalachian Populations: A Systematic Review.
J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):602-623. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12550. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
4
Disparities in Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer Outcomes in Appalachia: A Comprehensive Review.
Am Surg. 2025 Apr;91(4):633-638. doi: 10.1177/00031348241312124. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
6
Effectiveness of workplace cancer screening interventions: a systematic review.
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12649-0.
7
Cancer Incidence in Appalachia, 2004-2011.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb;25(2):250-8. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0946. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Examining Geographic Disparity: Variation in Cancer Outcomes Within Appalachia.
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Apr 1;240(4):425-436. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001273. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Geographic Disparity: Variation in Cancer Outcomes Within Appalachia.
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Apr 1;240(4):425-436. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001273. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Lung and Colorectal Cancer Disparities in Appalachian Kentucky: Spatial Analysis on the Influence of Education and Literacy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 14;20(14):6363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146363.
4
Differences in obesity-related health behaviors and health outcomes by rural and Appalachian residency.
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(12):1113-1121. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01741-8. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Screening Delays.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 10;41(17):3194-3202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01704. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
7
Extranodal Extension Improves AJCC-8 Accuracy in HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer in a High-Risk Population.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Oct;133(10):2621-2626. doi: 10.1002/lary.30572. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.
2
#CRCFREE: Using Social Media to Reduce Colorectal Cancer Risk in Rural Adults.
Am J Health Behav. 2020 May 1;44(3):353-363. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.3.8.
3
Effectiveness of patient-targeted interventions to increase cancer screening participation in rural areas: A systematic review.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Jan;101:103401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103401. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
4
Cancer-Related Beliefs and Perceptions in Appalachia: Findings from 3 States.
J Rural Health. 2019 Mar;35(2):176-188. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
7
Making the Case for Investment in Rural Cancer Control: An Analysis of Rural Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Funding Trends.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul;26(7):992-997. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Trends and Patterns of Disparities in Cancer Mortality Among US Counties, 1980-2014.
JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):388-406. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20324.
10
Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Population: Who Returns Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kits?
J Rural Health. 2017 Sep;33(4):371-374. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12210. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验