• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价增加非裔美国人粪便潜血结直肠癌筛查的干预措施。

Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State University Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

Department of Cancer Control, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z
PMID:32583358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7313439/
Abstract

African Americans experience colorectal cancer (CRC) related disparities compared to other racial groups in the United States. African Americans are frequently diagnosed with CRC at a later stage, screening is underutilized, and mortality rates are highest in this group. This systematic review focused on intervention studies using stool blood CRC screening among African Americans in primary care and community settings. Given wide accessibility, low cost, and ease of dissemination of stool-based CRC screening tests, this review aims to determine effective interventions to improve participation rates. This systematic review included intervention studies published between January 1, 2000 and March 16, 2019. After reviewing an initial search of 650 studies, 11 studies were eventually included in this review. The included studies were studies conducted in community and clinical settings, using both inreach and outreach strategies to increase CRC screening. For each study, an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for the CRC screening intervention compared to the control arm was calculated based on the data in each study to report effectiveness. The eleven studies together recruited a total of 3334 participants. The five studies using two-arm experimental designs ranged in effectiveness with ORs ranging from 1.1 to 13.0 using interventions such as mailed reminders, patient navigation, and tailored educational materials. Effective strategies to increase stool blood testing included mailed stool blood tests augmented by patient navigation, tailored educational materials, and follow-up calls or mailings to increase trust in the patient-provider relationship. More studies are needed on stool blood testing interventions to determine effectiveness in this population.

摘要

非裔美国人在美国经历着与其他种族群体相比的结直肠癌(CRC)相关差异。非裔美国人通常在较晚阶段被诊断出患有 CRC,筛查利用率低,而且死亡率在这个群体中最高。本系统综述重点关注在初级保健和社区环境中使用粪便潜血 CRC 筛查的干预性研究。鉴于粪便 CRC 筛查测试具有广泛的可及性、低成本和易于传播的特点,本综述旨在确定有效的干预措施以提高参与率。本系统综述纳入了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 16 日期间发表的干预性研究。在对最初搜索的 650 项研究进行审查后,最终有 11 项研究纳入本综述。纳入的研究在社区和临床环境中进行,采用内部和外部扩展策略来增加 CRC 筛查。对于每项研究,根据每项研究中的数据计算 CRC 筛查干预与对照组相比的未调整比值比(OR),以报告有效性。这 11 项研究共招募了 3334 名参与者。五项采用两臂实验设计的研究有效性不同,OR 范围从 1.1 到 13.0,干预措施包括邮寄提醒、患者导航和定制教育材料。增加粪便潜血检测的有效策略包括通过患者导航、定制教育材料以及后续电话或邮件来增加患者与提供者关系的信任,从而增强邮寄的粪便检测。需要更多关于粪便潜血检测干预的研究来确定该人群的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/7313439/8aa2930196d2/10900_2020_867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/7313439/8aa2930196d2/10900_2020_867_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09aa/7313439/8aa2930196d2/10900_2020_867_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.系统评价增加非裔美国人粪便潜血结直肠癌筛查的干预措施。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.
2
Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、导航或患者提醒?利用微模拟为选择干预措施提供信息,以增加医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105836. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
3
Increasing colon cancer screening in primary care among African Americans.提高非裔美国人在初级保健中的结肠癌筛查率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Dec 6;106(12). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju344. Print 2014 Dec.
4
Assessing the effectiveness of a community health advisor plus screen to save educational intervention on stool-based testing adherence in an African American safety net clinic population: study protocol for a randomized pragmatic trial.评估社区卫生顾问加筛查对非裔美国人医疗服务提供系统人群基于粪便的检测依从性的教育干预效果:一项随机实用试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Feb 15;23(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06076-4.
5
Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.患者邮件宣传促进结直肠癌筛查的成本效益。
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6):553-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbd8eb.
6
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.
7
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Engaging the Community on Colorectal Cancer Screening Education: Focus Group Discussions Among African Americans.社区参与结直肠癌筛查教育:非裔美国人的焦点小组讨论。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02019-w. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
9
A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.一项为期5年的随机试验表明,一个支持力度逐步增加的集中式邮寄项目可提高结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。
Cancer. 2017 Nov 15;123(22):4472-4480. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30908. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans in an integrated Veterans Affairs health care network.在一个综合的退伍军人事务医疗保健网络中,非裔美国人对结直肠癌筛查的接受率较低。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug;80(2):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.045. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Black-White disparities across the colorectal cancer care continuum in the USA.美国结直肠癌治疗全程中的黑人和白人差异。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41575-025-01087-3.
2
Effectiveness of a community health advisor colorectal cancer screening educational intervention on stool test completion in an African American primary care patient population: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.社区健康顾问结直肠癌筛查教育干预对非裔美国初级保健患者群体粪便检测完成情况的有效性:一项实用随机对照试验
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;3(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00168-4.
3
Effectiveness of health promotion interventions to increase faecal occult blood test uptake rates among older adults with an average-risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardized Workflows Improve Colonoscopy Follow-Up After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Safety-Net System.标准化工作流程改善了安全网系统中粪便免疫化学检测异常后的结肠镜检查随访。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Mar;66(3):768-774. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06228-z. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Colorectal cancer screening patterns after the American Cancer Society's recommendation to initiate screening at age 45 years.美国癌症协会建议从45岁开始进行结直肠癌筛查后的筛查模式。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 15;126(6):1351-1353. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32662. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
3
A Systematic Review of U.S.-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Intervention Systematic Reviews: Available Evidence and Lessons Learned for Research and Practice.
促进健康干预措施提高结直肠癌平均风险老年人群粪便潜血试验接受率的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025 Feb 18;12:100670. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100670. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
Are we ready? assessing effectiveness and implementation of cancer control strategies in primary care: a comprehensive review of systematic reviews.我们准备好了吗?评估初级保健中癌症控制策略的有效性和实施情况:系统评价的综合回顾。
Fam Pract. 2025 Feb 7;42(2). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae078.
5
A socioecological taxonomy of determinants to colorectal cancer screening in black men: Insights from a mixed-methods systematic review.黑人男性结直肠癌筛查决定因素的社会生态分类:一项混合方法系统评价的见解
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Dec 25;49:102954. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102954. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
A pilot randomized clinical trial of a smartphone-based application to support at-home PSA screening and culturally tailored prostate cancer education for African American men: A study protocol.一项基于智能手机应用程序的试点随机临床试验,旨在支持非裔美国男性进行居家前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查以及提供文化定制的前列腺癌教育:一项研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;147:107737. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107737. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
7
Leveraging Multi-Sectoral Partnership for Colorectal Cancer Education and Screening in the African American Community: A Protocol and Preliminary Results.利用多部门伙伴关系开展非裔美国人社区结直肠癌教育与筛查:方案与初步结果
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr;40(2):248-255. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02506-w. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
8
Cancer Patients Satisfaction and Quality of Healthcare Services in Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate the Quality of Care in Cancer Management.伊拉克癌症患者的满意度和医疗保健服务质量:一项评估癌症管理护理质量的横断面研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Jun 1;25(6):2159-2167. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.6.2159.
9
Supporting ColoREctal Equitable Navigation (SCREEN): a protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial for patient navigation in primary care.支持结直肠癌公平导航(SCREEN):一项在初级保健中进行患者导航的阶梯式楔形整群随机试验方案。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jun 3;5(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00598-5.
10
Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening using the 5As framework: A systematic review of US studies.使用5A框架进行结直肠癌筛查的障碍与促进因素:对美国研究的系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Jul 29;35:102353. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102353. eCollection 2023 Oct.
对美国结直肠癌筛查接受情况干预的系统评价:现有证据及研究与实践的经验教训
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 11;7:145. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00145. eCollection 2019.
4
Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019.2019 年非裔美国人癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 May;69(3):211-233. doi: 10.3322/caac.21555. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
5
The cascade of social determinants in producing chronic disease in low-income African-American men.社会决定因素在导致低收入非裔美国男性慢性病中的级联效应。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1549920. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2018.1549920.
6
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Clinical and Genetic Factors to Inform Reducing Colorectal Cancer Disparitites in African Americans.影响非裔美国人降低结直肠癌差异的临床和遗传因素
Front Oncol. 2018 Nov 20;8:531. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00531. eCollection 2018.
8
Creating and Implementing a National Public Health Campaign: The American Cancer Society's and National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable's 80% by 2018 Initiative.创建并实施一项全国性公共卫生运动:美国癌症协会与全国结直肠癌圆桌会议的“到2018年实现80%目标”倡议。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1739-1741. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0384-1. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
9
Formative Research on Knowledge and Preferences for Stool-based Tests compared to Colonoscopy: What Patients and Providers Think.基于粪便的检测与结肠镜检查相比的知识和偏好的形成性研究:患者和提供者的想法。
J Community Health. 2018 Dec;43(6):1085-1092. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0525-x.
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Prevention.结直肠癌筛查与预防
Am Fam Physician. 2018 May 15;97(10):658-665.