• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项系统评价健康促进干预措施以提高乳腺癌筛查参与度:来自过去 12 年。

A systematic review of health promotion interventions to increase breast cancer screening uptake: from the last 12 years.

机构信息

Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2018 Dec 1;28(6):1149-1155. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx231.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckx231
PMID:29351597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6241206/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcome of breast cancer treatment largely depends on the timing of detection. The health promotion interventions have an immense contribution to early detection and improved survival. Therefore, this review aimed to provide evidence on the efficacy of the health promotion interventions to increase the uptake of breast cancer screening and to develop effective interventions targeting women.

METHODS

Online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central, Ovid/MEDILINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for studies published between January 2005 and January 2017. A quality coding system was assessed using Cochrane checklists for randomized controlled trial (RCT) and Downs and Black checklists for non-RCT. The score was rated for the included articles by each researcher independently and the average score is given accordingly. This study was registered in PROSPERO as [PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017060488].

RESULTS

The review dovetailed 22 studies. Thirteen studies (59.10%) were conducted in the Unite States, 4 in Iran (18.18%), 2 in India (9.09%) and 1 each in Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Israel. The interventions were classified as 'individual-based', 'community-based', 'group-based teachings and training' and 'behavioral model based'. The majority of the studies showed favorable outcomes after health promotion interventions, including improvements in women's view of breast screening, breast self-examination and knowledge of breast screening.

CONCLUSION

The review confirmed that most of the health promotion interventions targeting women boosted the breast screening in one or another way. However, the limited quality of the included studies showed that further research is needed to improve the trials in the next future.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌治疗的结果在很大程度上取决于发现的时间。健康促进干预措施对早期发现和提高生存率有巨大的贡献。因此,本综述旨在提供关于健康促进干预措施增加乳腺癌筛查率的疗效的证据,并为针对女性的有效干预措施提供依据。

方法

在线数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central、Ovid/MEDILINE、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar)检索了 2005 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月期间发表的研究。使用 Cochrane 清单对随机对照试验(RCT)和 Downs 和 Black 清单对非 RCT 进行质量编码系统评估。每位研究人员独立对纳入的文章进行评分,并给出相应的平均分。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册为 [PROSPERO 2017:CRD42017060488]。

结果

综述共纳入 22 项研究。其中 13 项研究(59.10%)在美国进行,4 项在伊朗(18.18%),2 项在印度(9.09%),1 项分别在土耳其、沙特阿拉伯和以色列。干预措施分为“个体为基础”、“社区为基础”、“团体教学和培训”和“基于行为模式”。大多数研究显示健康促进干预后有良好的效果,包括改善女性对乳房筛查的看法、乳房自我检查和乳房筛查知识。

结论

本综述证实,大多数针对女性的健康促进干预措施以一种或另一种方式促进了乳房筛查。然而,纳入研究的质量有限表明,需要进一步研究以提高未来的试验质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9b/6241206/a5fc93e1572a/ckx231f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9b/6241206/a5fc93e1572a/ckx231f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9b/6241206/a5fc93e1572a/ckx231f1.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review of health promotion interventions to increase breast cancer screening uptake: from the last 12 years.一项系统评价健康促进干预措施以提高乳腺癌筛查参与度:来自过去 12 年。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Dec 1;28(6):1149-1155. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx231.
2
A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake.系统评价健康教育干预措施增加宫颈癌筛查率的有效性。
Eur J Public Health. 2018 Dec 1;28(6):1156-1162. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky197.
3
Breast Cancer Screening Barriers from the Womans Perspective: a Meta-synthesis.从女性视角看乳腺癌筛查障碍:一项元综合分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(8):3463-71. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.8.3463.
4
Opportunity for breast cancer screening in limited resource countries: a literature review and implications for Iran.资源有限国家的乳腺癌筛查机会:文献综述及对伊朗的启示
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12(10):2467-75.
5
The impact of breast cancer awareness interventions on breast screening uptake among women in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.乳腺癌意识干预对英国女性乳房筛查参与度的影响:系统评价。
J Health Psychol. 2019 Jan;24(1):113-124. doi: 10.1177/1359105317697812. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Factors Affecting Preferences of Iranian Women for Breast Cancer Screening Based on Marketing Mix Components.基于营销组合要素的影响伊朗女性乳腺癌筛查偏好的因素
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3939-43.
7
Effects of Interventions Based on Health Behavior Models on Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors of Migrant Women in Turkey.基于健康行为模型的干预措施对土耳其移民妇女乳腺癌筛查行为的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):E40-50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000268.
8
9
10
Effectiveness of workplace cancer screening interventions: a systematic review.工作场所癌症筛查干预措施的效果:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12649-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing and evaluation of the effect of community-based intervention on breast self-examination among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女基于社区的乳房自我检查干预措施的设计与效果评估:一项整群随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0329839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329839. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of the music-supported education program on the awareness and health beliefs of Roma women about cervical cancer and screening.音乐辅助教育项目对罗姆族女性宫颈癌及筛查的认知和健康观念的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):1536. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21884-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.《2013 年全球癌症负担》。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jul;1(4):505-27. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735.
2
Effects of Interventions Based on Health Behavior Models on Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors of Migrant Women in Turkey.基于健康行为模型的干预措施对土耳其移民妇女乳腺癌筛查行为的影响。
Cancer Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):E40-50. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000268.
3
Improving Breast Cancer Preventive Behavior among Female Medical Staff: The Use of Educational Intervention based on Health Belief Model.
Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake.
在服务不足群体中推进乳腺钼靶筛查:增加乳腺癌筛查接受率的干预策略的系统评价和荟萃分析
Public Health Rev. 2025 Apr 4;46:1607873. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607873. eCollection 2025.
4
Willingness to Implement Narrative Communication Interventions: Mixed Methods Study Among Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.实施叙事沟通干预措施的意愿:尼日利亚伊巴丹大学学院医院乳腺癌患者及幸存者的混合方法研究
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251328413. doi: 10.1177/10732748251328413. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Breast Cancer Screening Participation and Internet Search Activity in a Japanese Population: Decade-Long Time-Series Study.日本人群中乳腺癌筛查参与情况与网络搜索活动:长达十年的时间序列研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 4;11:e64020. doi: 10.2196/64020.
6
Assessing personal and health system barriers to breast cancer early diagnosis practices for women over 20 years old in Cluj-Napoca, Romania.评估罗马尼亚克鲁日-纳波卡市20岁以上女性乳腺癌早期诊断实践中的个人和卫生系统障碍。
Med Pharm Rep. 2025 Jan;98(1):118-124. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2694. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
7
A Scoping Review of 20 Years Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Iran.伊朗20年乳腺癌筛查项目的范围综述
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jan;54(1):88-100. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i1.17577.
8
Strengthening uptake of breast cancer screening services in Tanzania; re-visiting the breast cancer screening messages.加强坦桑尼亚的乳腺癌筛查服务的采用率;重新审视乳腺癌筛查信息。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):1312. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12960-w.
9
A health belief model-based community health education on mammography screening among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: a randomized controlled trial.基于健康信念模型的社区健康教育对埃塞俄比亚生育年龄妇女进行乳房 X 光筛查的随机对照试验。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 26;12:1377173. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377173. eCollection 2024.
10
The effect of adverse childhood experience training, screening, and response in primary care: a systematic review.初级保健中不良童年经历的培训、筛查及应对效果:一项系统综述
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Oct 24;65:102282. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102282. eCollection 2023 Nov.
提高女性医务人员的乳腺癌预防行为:基于健康信念模型的教育干预措施的应用。
Malays J Med Sci. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):44-50.
4
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
5
Effects of a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Repeat Mammography Screening in Iranian Women.一项增加伊朗女性重复乳腺钼靶筛查的随机对照试验的效果
Cancer Nurs. 2015 Jul-Aug;38(4):288-96. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000185.
6
Screening for new primary cancers in cancer survivors compared to non-cancer controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症幸存者与非癌症对照者中新原发癌的筛查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):455-63. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0278-6. Epub 2013 May 5.
7
Breast cancer prevention knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among college women and mother-daughter communication.大学生女性乳腺癌预防知识、态度和行为及母女间的交流。
J Community Health. 2013 Jun;38(3):560-8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9651-7.
8
A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women.一项系统评价:干预措施对提高亚洲女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 7;12:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-413.
9
Clinical breast examination: preliminary results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in India.临床乳房检查:印度一项群组随机对照试验的初步结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Oct 5;103(19):1476-80. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr304. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
10
A community intervention: AMBER: Arab American breast cancer education and referral program.社区干预:Amber:美籍阿拉伯乳腺癌教育和转介计划。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2011 Dec;13(6):1041-7. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9481-6.