• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动医疗应用程序在医疗紧急情况下的应用:系统评价。

Mobile Health Apps for Medical Emergencies: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Signal Theory and Communications, and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Polytechnic of Coimbra, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Oliveira do Hospital, Oliveira do Hospital, Portugal.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 11;8(12):e18513. doi: 10.2196/18513.

DOI:10.2196/18513
PMID:33306037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7762680/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile health apps are used to improve the quality of health care. These apps are changing the current scenario in health care, and their numbers are increasing.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to perform an analysis of the current status of mobile health technologies and apps for medical emergencies. We aimed to synthesize the existing body of knowledge to provide relevant insights for this topic. Moreover, we wanted to identify common threads and gaps to support new challenging, interesting, and relevant research directions.

METHODS

We reviewed the main relevant papers and apps available in the literature. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was used in this review. The search criteria were adopted using systematic methods to select papers and apps. On one hand, a bibliographic review was carried out in different search databases to collect papers related to each application in the health emergency field using defined criteria. On the other hand, a review of mobile apps in two virtual storage platforms (Google Play Store and Apple App Store) was carried out. The Google Play Store and Apple App Store are related to the Android and iOS operating systems, respectively.

RESULTS

In the literature review, 28 papers in the field of medical emergency were included. These studies were collected and selected according to established criteria. Moreover, we proposed a taxonomy using six groups of applications. In total, 324 mobile apps were found, with 192 identified in the Google Play Store and 132 identified in the Apple App Store.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that all apps in the Google Play Store were free, and 73 apps in the Apple App Store were paid, with the price ranging from US $0.89 to US $5.99. Moreover, 39% (11/28) of the included studies were related to warning systems for emergency services and 21% (6/28) were associated with disaster management apps.

摘要

背景

移动健康应用程序被用于改善医疗保健质量。这些应用程序正在改变医疗保健的现状,其数量正在增加。

目的

我们想对医疗急救用移动健康技术和应用程序的现状进行分析。我们旨在综合现有知识体系,为该主题提供相关见解。此外,我们还希望确定常见的线索和差距,以支持新的具有挑战性、有趣和相关的研究方向。

方法

我们对文献中主要的相关论文和应用程序进行了回顾。本综述采用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法。使用系统方法来选择与每个健康急救应用程序相关的论文和应用程序,确定了搜索标准。一方面,在不同的搜索数据库中进行了文献回顾,以收集与健康急救领域的每个应用程序相关的论文,使用了定义的标准。另一方面,对两个虚拟存储平台(Google Play 商店和 Apple App Store)中的移动应用程序进行了审查。Google Play 商店和 Apple App Store 分别与 Android 和 iOS 操作系统相关。

结果

在文献综述中,纳入了 28 篇医学急救领域的论文。根据既定标准收集和选择了这些研究。此外,我们提出了一个使用六组应用程序的分类法。共发现 324 个移动应用程序,其中 192 个在 Google Play 商店中,132 个在 Apple App Store 中。

结论

我们发现,Google Play 商店中的所有应用程序都是免费的,Apple App Store 中有 73 个应用程序是付费的,价格从 0.89 美元到 5.99 美元不等。此外,28 篇纳入研究中有 39%(11/28)与紧急服务警告系统有关,21%(6/28)与灾害管理应用程序有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/2f2c306f0a17/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/1a9057d00dc4/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/da654c61cff5/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/2f2c306f0a17/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/1a9057d00dc4/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/da654c61cff5/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e73b/7762680/2f2c306f0a17/mhealth_v8i12e18513_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobile Health Apps for Medical Emergencies: Systematic Review.移动医疗应用程序在医疗紧急情况下的应用:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 11;8(12):e18513. doi: 10.2196/18513.
2
Exploring Heart Disease-Related mHealth Apps in India: Systematic Search in App Stores and Metadata Analysis.探索印度与心脏病相关的移动健康应用程序:在应用商店中进行系统搜索和元数据分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e53823. doi: 10.2196/53823.
3
Self-Management Support Apps for Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Systematic Search in App Stores and Mobile App Rating Scale Evaluation.脊髓损伤的自我管理支持应用程序:在应用商店中的系统搜索结果及移动应用评分量表评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Dec 19;12:e53677. doi: 10.2196/53677.
4
Quality Assessment of Smartphone Medication Management Apps in France: Systematic Search.法国智能手机药物管理应用程序的质量评估:系统检索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 18;12:e54866. doi: 10.2196/54866.
5
Mobile health applications for epilepsy in Indian app stores: A systematic review and content analysis using the mobile app rating scale.印度应用商店中用于癫痫的移动健康应用程序:使用移动应用评分量表的系统评价和内容分析
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Mar;201:107331. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107331. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
6
Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.大流行早期推出的 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序:内容分析和综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796.
7
mHealth Strategies Related to HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Knowledge and Access: Systematic Literature Review, Technology Prospecting of Patent Databases, and Systematic Search on App Stores.移动医疗策略与 HIV 暴露后预防知识和获取相关:系统文献综述、专利数据库技术展望以及应用商店系统检索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 16;9(2):e23912. doi: 10.2196/23912.
8
mHealth Solutions for Perinatal Mental Health: Scoping Review and Appraisal Following the mHealth Index and Navigation Database Framework.移动医疗在围产期心理健康中的应用:基于移动医疗索引和导航数据库框架的系统评价和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 17;10(1):e30724. doi: 10.2196/30724.
9
Mobile Triage Applications: A Systematic Review in Literature and Play Store.移动分诊应用程序:文献和应用商店中的系统评价。
J Med Syst. 2021 Aug 13;45(9):86. doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01763-2.
10
Review and Analysis of German Mobile Apps for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.使用移动应用程序评级量表对德国炎症性肠病管理的移动应用程序进行回顾和分析:应用商店的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 3;10(5):e31102. doi: 10.2196/31102.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Smartphone Apps on Reperfusion Times and Clinical Outcomes in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.智能手机应用程序对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死再灌注时间和临床结局的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 25;13:e66605. doi: 10.2196/66605.
2
Development and usability evaluation of a mHealth application for prehospital triage.一款用于院前分诊的移动健康应用程序的开发与可用性评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06952-4.
3
Voice-Activated Self-Monitoring Application (VoiS): Perspectives from People with Diabetes and Hypertension.

本文引用的文献

1
Content Analysis of Apps for Growth Monitoring and Growth Hormone Treatment: Systematic Search in the Android App Store.应用程序用于生长监测和生长激素治疗的内容分析:在安卓应用商店中的系统搜索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Feb 18;8(2):e16208. doi: 10.2196/16208.
2
App Features for Type 1 Diabetes Support and Patient Empowerment: Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark Comparison.1型糖尿病支持与患者赋权的应用程序功能:系统文献综述与基准比较
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 21;6(11):e12237. doi: 10.2196/12237.
3
Systematic Review about QoS and QoE in Telemedicine and eHealth Services and Applications.
语音激活自我监测应用程序(VoiS):糖尿病和高血压患者的观点
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:875-884. eCollection 2024.
4
Knowledge attributes of public health management information systems used in health emergencies: a scoping review.卫生应急中使用的公共卫生管理信息系统的知识属性:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 20;12:1458867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1458867. eCollection 2024.
5
Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence Based Chatbots in Analyzing Orthopedic Pathologies: An Experimental Multi-Observer Analysis.基于人工智能的聊天机器人在分析骨科病理方面的准确性:一项多观察者实验分析。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 19;15(2):221. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020221.
6
Design and Development of Mobile Application for Managing Poisoned Patients.用于管理中毒患者的移动应用程序的设计与开发
Adv Biomed Res. 2024 Nov 30;13:107. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_430_23. eCollection 2024.
7
Applications of digital Medicine in oncology: Prospects and challenges.数字医学在肿瘤学中的应用:前景与挑战。
Cancer Innov. 2022 Dec 4;1(4):285-292. doi: 10.1002/cai2.37. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Methods used to evaluate usability of mobile clinical decision support systems for healthcare emergencies: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.用于评估医疗紧急情况中移动临床决策支持系统可用性的方法:一项系统综述与定性综合分析
JAMIA Open. 2023 Jul 12;6(3):ooad051. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad051. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
Real-world data using mHealth apps in rhinitis, rhinosinusitis and their multimorbidities.使用移动健康应用程序获取的关于鼻炎、鼻窦炎及其合并症的真实世界数据。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Nov;12(11):e12208. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12208.
10
Challenges in the Adoption of eHealth and mHealth for Adult Mental Health Management-Evidence from Romania.电子健康和移动健康在成人心理健康管理中的应用面临的挑战——来自罗马尼亚的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):9172. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159172.
远程医疗和电子健康服务与应用中的服务质量(QoS)和体验质量(QoE)的系统评价
J Med Syst. 2018 Aug 29;42(10):182. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1040-4.
4
Social Robots for People with Aging and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Literature.面向老年人和痴呆症患者的社交机器人:文献系统综述
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):533-540. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0051. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
A Systematic Literature Review of Technologies for Suicidal Behavior Prevention.自杀行为预防技术的系统文献综述
J Med Syst. 2018 Mar 5;42(4):71. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0926-5.
6
An Analysis of WhatsApp Usage for Communication Between Consulting and Emergency Physicians.分析咨询医师与急诊医师间使用 WhatsApp 进行通讯的情况
J Med Syst. 2016 Jun;40(6):130. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0483-8. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
An effective support system of emergency medical services with tablet computers.配备平板电脑的高效急诊医疗服务支持系统。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 27;3(1):e23. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3293.
8
Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: an analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams.智能手机让外科医生用上WhatsApp:急诊外科团队中的沟通分析
Am J Surg. 2015 Jan;209(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.030. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
10
Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement.提高随机对照试验的Meta分析报告质量:QUOROM声明。
Onkologie. 2000 Dec;23(6):597-602. doi: 10.1159/000055014.