文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

大流行早期推出的 COVID-19 移动健康应用程序:内容分析和综述。

Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.

机构信息

Pengiran Anak Puteri Rashidah Sa'adatul Bolkiah Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam.

School of Pharmacy, KPJ Healthcare University College, Nilai, Malaysia.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 16;8(9):e19796. doi: 10.2196/19796.


DOI:10.2196/19796
PMID:32609622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7505686/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile health (mHealth) app use is a major concern because of the possible dissemination of misinformation that could harm the users. Particularly, it can be difficult for health care professionals to recommend a suitable app for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) education and self-monitoring purposes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze and evaluate the contents as well as features of COVID-19 mobile apps. The findings are instrumental in helping health care professionals to identify suitable mobile apps for COVID-19 self-monitoring and education. The results of the mobile apps' assessment could potentially help mobile app developers improve or modify their existing mobile app designs to achieve optimal outcomes. METHODS: The search for the mHealth apps available in the android-based Play Store and the iOS-based App Store was conducted between April 18 and May 5, 2020. The region of the App Store where we performed the search was the United States, and a virtual private network app was used to locate and access COVID-19 mobile apps from all countries on the Google Play Store. The inclusion criteria were apps that are related to COVID-19 with no restriction in language type. The basic features assessment criteria used for comparison were the requirement for free subscription, internet connection, education or advisory content, size of the app, ability to export data, and automated data entry. The functionality of the apps was assessed according to knowledge (information on COVID-19), tracing or mapping of COVID-19 cases, home monitoring surveillance, online consultation with a health authority, and official apps run by health authorities. RESULTS: Of the 223 COVID-19-related mobile apps, only 30 (19.9%) found in the App Store and 28 (44.4%) in the Play Store matched the inclusion criteria. In the basic features assessment, most App Store (10/30, 33.3%) and Play Store (10/28, 35.7%) apps scored 4 out of 7 points. Meanwhile, the outcome of the functionality assessment for most App Store apps (13/30, 43.3%) was a score of 3 compared to android-based apps (10/28, 35.7%), which scored 2 (out of the maximum 5 points). Evaluation of the basic functions showed that 75.0% (n=36) of the 48 included mobile apps do not require a subscription, 56.3% (n=27) provide symptom advice, and 41.7% (n=20) have educational content. In terms of the specific functions, more than half of the included mobile apps are official mobile apps maintained by a health authority for COVID-19 information provision. Around 37.5% (n=18) and 31.3% (n=15) of the mobile apps have tracing or mapping and home monitoring surveillance functions, respectively, with only 17% (n=8) of the mobile apps equipped with an online consultation function. CONCLUSIONS: Most iOS-based apps incorporate infographic mapping of COVID-19 cases, while most android-based apps incorporate home monitoring surveillance features instead of providing focused educational content on COVID-19. It is important to evaluate the contents and features of COVID-19 mobile apps to guide users in choosing a suitable mobile app based on their requirements.

摘要

背景:移动健康(mHealth)应用的使用引起了广泛关注,因为这些应用可能会传播错误信息,从而对用户造成伤害。特别是,医疗保健专业人员很难为冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的教育和自我监测目的推荐合适的应用程序。

目的:本研究旨在分析和评估 COVID-19 移动应用程序的内容和功能。研究结果有助于帮助医疗保健专业人员识别适合 COVID-19 自我监测和教育的移动应用程序。对移动应用程序的评估结果可能有助于移动应用程序开发人员改进或修改现有的移动应用程序设计,以达到最佳效果。

方法:于 2020 年 4 月 18 日至 5 月 5 日在基于安卓的 Play 商店和基于 iOS 的 App Store 中搜索 mHealth 应用程序。我们在 App Store 中进行搜索的地区是美国,并且使用虚拟专用网络应用程序在 Google Play Store 中查找和访问来自所有国家的 COVID-19 移动应用程序。纳入标准是与 COVID-19 相关的应用程序,没有语言类型的限制。用于比较的基本功能评估标准是免费订阅、互联网连接、教育或咨询内容、应用程序大小、数据导出能力和自动数据输入要求。根据知识(关于 COVID-19 的信息)、COVID-19 病例的追踪或映射、家庭监测监测、与卫生当局的在线咨询以及卫生当局运行的官方应用程序对应用程序的功能进行评估。

结果:在 223 个与 COVID-19 相关的移动应用程序中,仅在 App Store 中找到的 30 个(占 19.9%)和在 Play Store 中找到的 28 个(占 44.4%)符合纳入标准。在基本功能评估中,大多数 App Store(30/30,33.3%)和 Play Store(28/28,35.7%)应用程序的得分为 7 分中的 4 分。同时,大多数 App Store 应用程序(13/30,43.3%)的功能评估结果得分为 3 分,而基于安卓的应用程序(10/28,35.7%)得分为 2 分(最高得分为 5 分)。基本功能评估显示,48 个包含的移动应用程序中有 75.0%(n=36)不需要订阅,56.3%(n=27)提供症状建议,41.7%(n=20)具有教育内容。就特定功能而言,包含的移动应用程序中有一半以上是由卫生当局维护的官方移动应用程序,用于提供 COVID-19 信息。大约 37.5%(n=18)和 31.3%(n=15)的移动应用程序具有 COVID-19 病例的追踪或映射和家庭监测监测功能,只有 17%(n=8)的移动应用程序配备了在线咨询功能。

结论:大多数基于 iOS 的应用程序都采用 COVID-19 病例的信息图映射,而大多数基于安卓的应用程序则采用家庭监测监测功能,而不是提供关于 COVID-19 的重点教育内容。评估 COVID-19 移动应用程序的内容和功能非常重要,可以帮助用户根据自己的需求选择合适的移动应用程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/88938f1ceae4/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/8f9eae7be195/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/a8efecc4dbf2/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/88938f1ceae4/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/8f9eae7be195/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/a8efecc4dbf2/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b5/7505686/88938f1ceae4/mhealth_v8i9e19796_fig3.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Mobile Health Apps on COVID-19 Launched in the Early Days of the Pandemic: Content Analysis and Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-9-16

[2]
Features and Functionalities of Smartphone Apps Related to COVID-19: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-8-25

[3]
Insights from Review and Content Analysis of Current COVID-19 Mobile Apps and Recommendations for Future Pandemics.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-11-8

[4]
Health Apps for Combating COVID-19: Descriptive Review and Taxonomy.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-3-2

[5]
Evaluating Chinese Mobile Health Apps for Ankylosing Spondylitis Management: Systematic App Search.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-7-14

[6]
An overview of mobile applications (apps) to support the coronavirus disease 2019 response in India.

Indian J Med Res. 2020-5

[7]
Mobile Apps for Medication Management: Review and Analysis.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019-9-11

[8]
Descriptive Analysis of Mobile Apps for Management of COVID-19 in Spain and Development of an Innovate App in that field.

Sci Rep. 2022-10-25

[9]
Analysis of Apps With a Medication List Functionality for Older Adults With Heart Failure Using the Mobile App Rating Scale and the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score: Evaluation Study.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021-11-2

[10]
Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024-3-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effectiveness of Smart Mama application on postpartum depression, anxiety, and maternal-infant bonding among women during the postnatal period: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC Nurs. 2025-4-23

[2]
A comparison of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms between android and iOS CoronaCheck app users.

NPJ Digit Med. 2025-4-9

[3]
Exploring Heart Disease-Related mHealth Apps in India: Systematic Search in App Stores and Metadata Analysis.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-3-10

[4]
Physicians' acceptance and adoption of mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model.

Health Inf Manag. 2024-12-11

[5]
A comprehensive survey on exploring and analyzing COVID-19 mobile apps: Meta and exploratory analysis.

Heliyon. 2024-7-24

[6]
Patient satisfaction and digital health in primary health care: a scoping review protocol.

Front Public Health. 2024

[7]
Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Application for Educating Outpatients about Bowel Preparation.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024-7-10

[8]
Effectiveness and intention to use a COVID-19 self-management app for epidemiological investigation: a web-based survey study.

Front Public Health. 2024

[9]
Mobile Apps for Common Noncommunicable Disease Management: Systematic Search in App Stores and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024-3-12

[10]
Mobile Apps for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Reviews.

Healthcare (Basel). 2024-1-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Understanding and Preventing Health Concerns About Emerging Mobile Health Technologies.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-5-25

[2]
Containing COVID-19 Among 627,386 Persons in Contact With the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Passengers Who Disembarked in Taiwan: Big Data Analytics.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-5-5

[3]
Top Concerns of Tweeters During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-4-21

[4]
Covid-19: Researchers launch app to track spread of symptoms in the UK.

BMJ. 2020-3-27

[5]
mHealth and patient generated health data: stakeholder perspectives on opportunities and barriers for transforming healthcare.

Mhealth. 2020-1-5

[6]
A Framework for Competencies for the Use of Mobile Technologies in Psychiatry and Medicine: Scoping Review.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020-2-21

[7]
Identification of COVID-19 can be quicker through artificial intelligence framework using a mobile phone-based survey when cities and towns are under quarantine.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020-3-3

[8]
MHealth and perceived quality of care delivery: a conceptual model and validation.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020-2-27

[9]
A Content Analysis of Mobile Phone Applications for the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Urinary Tract Infections, and Their Compliance with European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological Infections.

Eur Urol Focus. 2021-1

[10]
Beyond validation: getting health apps into clinical practice.

NPJ Digit Med. 2020-2-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索