Conger B, Nelson E C, Dietrich A J, Blanchard C, McHugo G J, Simmons J J, Vernon P, Secker-Walker R, Wasson J H
Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03756.
Am J Prev Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;3(4):223-6.
The Dartmouth Primary Care Cooperative Information (COOP) Project conducted a controlled trial on the impact of antismoking advice from office-based physicians. Eighteen primary care medical practices were randomly assigned to be intervention or customary care practices. Medical personnel assigned to the intervention practices were to systematically identify cigarette smokers (among patients aged 35 to 59 years making an office visit), advise them to quit smoking, and provide educational materials. A random sample of 258 smokers was identified and followed-up four months later. Intervention-group smokers were more likely to report being advised to quit smoking (77 percent versus 47 percent) and to attempt quitting (39 percent versus 31 percent), but had success rates similar to those of the other group (6 percent versus 7 percent). We conclude that the medical office is an excellent place to identify large numbers of smokers and initiate attempts at quitting, but find that simple antismoking information and advice are not enough to improve cessation rates.
达特茅斯初级保健合作信息(COOP)项目针对门诊医生提供的戒烟建议的影响进行了一项对照试验。18个初级保健医疗实践机构被随机分配为干预组或常规护理组。分配到干预组的医务人员要系统地识别吸烟者(年龄在35至59岁前来门诊就诊的患者中),建议他们戒烟,并提供教育材料。识别出258名吸烟者的随机样本,并在四个月后进行随访。干预组的吸烟者更有可能报告被建议戒烟(77%对47%)并尝试戒烟(39%对31%),但成功率与另一组相似(6%对7%)。我们得出结论,医疗门诊是识别大量吸烟者并启动戒烟尝试的绝佳场所,但发现简单的戒烟信息和建议不足以提高戒烟率。