Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Alkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Dan Duncan Cancer Center Member, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(2):614-623. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.11.047. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
The notion of probiotics as microbes that confer health benefits has its origins in the speculative ideas that are more than a century old, yet remain largely unsubstantiated by scientific evidence. The recent advances in microbiome science have highlighted the importance of intestinal microbes in human physiology and disease pathogenesis. These developments have provided a boost to the probiotics industry, which continues to experience exponential growth driven mainly by creative marketing. Consumers, patients, and most health care providers are not able to discern the underlying science or differentiate the permitted claims that promise vague health benefits from disease-specific claims reserved for drugs. No probiotic product has been able to satisfy the regulatory requirements to be categorized as a drug, a substance intended to cure, mitigate, or prevent disease. However, patients take probiotic products in the belief that they will help to treat their intestinal or systemic diseases. Thus far, the regulators have failed to create policies that would assist to inform the public in this area. In fact, the existing regulatory regime actually creates formidable barriers to research that could provide evidence for clinical efficacy of probiotic products. We propose a potential solution to this vexing problem, where a committee created through a partnership of academia, professional organizations, and industry, but free of potential conflicts of interest, would be charged with rigorous evaluation of specific probiotic products and the evidence in support of their different claims. Companies that would submit to this process would earn the trust of consumers and healthcare providers, as well as a distinction in the marketplace.
益生菌作为有益健康的微生物的概念源于一个多世纪前的推测性想法,但这些想法在很大程度上仍没有得到科学证据的支持。最近微生物组科学的进展强调了肠道微生物在人类生理学和疾病发病机制中的重要性。这些发展为益生菌产业提供了助力,该产业继续呈指数级增长,主要得益于富有创意的营销。消费者、患者和大多数医疗保健提供者无法辨别潜在的科学原理,也无法区分那些承诺模糊健康益处的许可声明和仅适用于药物的特定疾病声明。没有一种益生菌产品能够满足被归类为药物的监管要求,即用于治愈、缓解或预防疾病的物质。然而,患者服用益生菌产品是因为他们相信这些产品将有助于治疗他们的肠道或系统性疾病。迄今为止,监管机构未能制定相关政策来帮助公众了解这方面的情况。事实上,现有的监管机制实际上为可能提供益生菌产品临床疗效证据的研究设置了难以逾越的障碍。我们提出了一个潜在的解决方案来解决这个令人困扰的问题,即通过学术界、专业组织和行业的合作创建一个委员会,该委员会不涉及潜在的利益冲突,负责严格评估特定的益生菌产品及其支持其不同声明的证据。愿意接受这一程序的公司将赢得消费者和医疗保健提供者的信任,并在市场上获得认可。