• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical prioritisation of revision knee surgical procedures: BASK working group consensus document.临床膝关节翻修手术的优先排序:BASK 工作组共识文件。
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
2
Short-term Follow-up of Antibiotic-loaded Articulating Cement Spacers in Two-stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.感染性全膝关节置换二期翻修中抗生素骨水泥关节连接型间隔物的短期随访:病例系列研究
Orthop Surg. 2018 May;10(2):128-133. doi: 10.1111/os.12381. Epub 2018 May 17.
3
Long-term outcomes of primary constrained condylar knee arthroplasty.初次受限型髁膝关节置换术的长期疗效
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Jun;101(4):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.020. Epub 2015 May 4.
4
Hinged versus CCK revision arthroplasty for the stiff total knee.用于僵硬全膝关节的铰链式与CCK翻修关节成形术
Knee. 2019 Jan;26(1):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
5
Complications and failures of non-tumoral hinged total knee arthroplasty in primary and aseptic revision surgery: A review of 290 cases.非肿瘤铰链式全膝关节置换术在初次和无菌翻修手术中的并发症和失败:290 例回顾。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102875. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102875. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
6
Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.在使用骨水泥固定柄的 416 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,采用内翻-外翻限制技术可提供可靠的重建,在早期至中期随访中具有较低的后续翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):458-462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0719.R2.
7
Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.翻修全膝关节置换术,使用骨水泥固定的后稳定、髁间限制或完全限制假体:至少 2 年的随访分析。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):112-20. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.112. Epub 2010 May 4.
8
The experience of patients undergoing aseptic, elective revision knee joint replacement surgery: a qualitative study.接受无菌、择期翻修膝关节置换手术的患者的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 29;25(1):676. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07778-3.
9
[Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasties with DAIR Method - Factors Affecting the Two-Year Survival Rate].[采用DAIR方法翻修感染性全膝关节置换术——影响两年生存率的因素]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(3):175-182.
10
Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It as Good as a Primary Result?单髁膝关节置换翻修为全膝关节置换:其结果是否与初次置换一样好?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S105-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges with patient management of osteoarthritis during the COVID-19 pandemic: review.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间骨关节炎患者管理面临的挑战:综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jun 21;85(8):3925-3930. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000978. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Safe Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的安全手术
Curr Obes Rep. 2022 Sep;11(3):203-214. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00458-6. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study.围手术期 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的死亡率和肺部并发症:一项国际队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):27-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X. Epub 2020 May 29.
2
Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?为什么如今全膝关节置换术会失败——10年后有什么变化吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024. Epub 2014 Jul 5.

临床膝关节翻修手术的优先排序:BASK 工作组共识文件。

Clinical prioritisation of revision knee surgical procedures: BASK working group consensus document.

机构信息

BASK, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, Holborn, London WC2A 3PE, United Kingdom.

BASK, Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln's Inn Fields, Holborn, London WC2A 3PE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Knee. 2021 Jan;28:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.011. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2020.10.011
PMID:33307320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9759366/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elective orthopaedic surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic requires careful case prioritisation. We aimed to produce consensus-based guidelines on the prioritisation of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures.

METHOD

Twenty-three revision TKA scenarios were assigned priority (NHS England/Royal College of Surgeons scale) by the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Revision Knee Working Group (n = 24). Consensus agreement was defined as ≥70% respondents (18/24) giving the same prioritisation. Two voting rounds were undertaken; procedures achieving <70% agreement were given their most commonly assigned priority.

RESULTS

18/23 procedures achieved ≥70% agreement. Three were P1a (surgery within <24 h); DAIR for sepsis, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) fixation and PPF-revision TKA. Three were P1b (<72 h); debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for a stable patient, flap coverage for an open knee, and acute extensor mechanism rupture. Eight were P2 (<4 weeks), including aseptic loosening at risk of collapse, inter-stage patients with poor functioning spacers. Five were P3 (<3 months), including second stage revision for infection, revision for instability with limited mobility. Four were P4 (can wait >3 months) e.g. aseptic loosening.

CONCLUSION

Sepsis and PPF surgery are the most urgent procedures. Although most procedures should be undertaken within one to three months (P2/3), these cases represent a small revision practice volume; P4 cases (e.g. aseptic loosening without risk of collapse) make up most surgeons' caseload. These recommendations are a guideline; patient co-morbidities, Covid-19 pathways, availability of support services and multi-disciplinary team discussion within the regional revision network will dictate prioritisation.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,择期骨科手术需要仔细进行病例优先级排序。我们旨在制定基于共识的修订全膝关节置换术(TKA)手术优先级排序指南。

方法

英国膝关节外科协会(BASK)修订膝关节工作组(n=24)对 23 例修订 TKA 情况进行了优先级排序(NHS England/Royal College of Surgeons 分级)。一致性协议定义为≥70%的受访者(24 人中的 18 人)给予相同的优先级排序。进行了两轮投票;未达到≥70%一致意见的手术采用最常分配的优先级。

结果

18/23 例手术达到≥70%的一致意见。其中 3 例为 P1a(<24 小时内手术):脓毒症、假体周围骨折(PPF)固定和 PPF 翻修 TKA 的清创、冲洗和引流(DAIR)。3 例为 P1b(<72 小时内):稳定患者的清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)、膝关节开放的皮瓣覆盖、急性伸肌机制破裂。8 例为 P2(<4 周),包括有塌陷风险的无菌性松动、间隔期功能不佳的 spacer 患者。5 例为 P3(<3 个月),包括感染的二期翻修、活动度有限的不稳定翻修。4 例为 P4(>3 个月可等待),如无菌性松动。

结论

脓毒症和 PPF 手术是最紧急的手术。尽管大多数手术应在 1 至 3 个月内进行(P2/3),但这些病例仅占小部分修订手术量;P4 病例(如无塌陷风险的无菌性松动)构成了大多数外科医生的病例量。这些建议是指南;患者合并症、新冠疫情路径、支持服务的可用性以及区域修订网络内的多学科团队讨论将决定优先级。