Horowitz Eran, Mizrachi Yossi, Finkelstein Maya, Farhi Jacob, Shalev Amir, Gold Eran, Raziel Arieh, Weissman Ariel
IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021 Sep;37(9):792-797. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1854717. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
Our aim was to study whether luteal phase support (LPS) increases the live-birth rate (LBR) in women undergoing modified natural cycle (mNC) frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).
In a randomized controlled trial, conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center, a total of 59 patients aged 18-45 years, underwent mNC-FET. FET was performed in mNC following ovulation triggering by hCG. Patients were randomized into two groups; The No-LPS Group included 28 women who did not receive LPS, and the LPS Group included 31 women who received vaginal progesterone for LPS. The main outcome measure was LBR.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the study groups. The no-LPS group and the LPS group did not differ with regard to clinical pregnancy rate (21.4% vs. 32.3%; respectively, = .35), LBR (17.9% vs. 19.4%; respectively, = .88), or spontaneous miscarriage rate (3.6% vs. 12.9%; respectively, = .35). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, LPS was not associated with LBR after controlling for confounders.
The results of our study suggest that LPS after mNC-FET does not improve the reproductive outcome, and therefore, might not be necessary. NCT01483365.
我们的目的是研究黄体期支持(LPS)是否能提高接受改良自然周期(mNC)冻融胚胎移植(FET)的女性的活产率(LBR)。
在一所大学附属三级医疗中心进行的一项随机对照试验中,共有59名年龄在18至45岁之间的患者接受了mNC-FET。在通过hCG触发排卵后,在mNC中进行FET。患者被随机分为两组;无LPS组包括28名未接受LPS的女性,LPS组包括31名接受阴道孕酮进行LPS的女性。主要结局指标是LBR。
研究组之间的基线人口统计学和临床特征具有可比性。无LPS组和LPS组在临床妊娠率(分别为21.4%对32.3%;P = 0.35)、LBR(分别为17.9%对19.4%;P = 0.88)或自然流产率(分别为3.6%对12.9%;P = 0.35)方面没有差异。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,在控制混杂因素后,LPS与LBR无关。
我们的研究结果表明,mNC-FET后的LPS并不能改善生殖结局,因此可能没有必要。NCT01483365。