UC Berkeley, Berkeley, USA.
Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jan-Jan;12(2):91-92. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2020.1846026. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
I consider the Doerig, Schruger, Herzog (this issue) paper to be a very important paper on the multiple empirical theories of consciousness (ToCs). The paper compared 13 different approaches. It would be wonderful to create a forum for all interested parties to discuss the many issues this paper brought up. Equally important is what the paper didn't bring up. Namely, how do the different empirical approaches connect to qualia, the subjective aspects of consciousness. In my mind, qualia is the biggest mystery facing present science. It would be good to see how the multiple interpretations might connect to qualia.
我认为多伊里格、施鲁格、赫佐格(本期)的论文是一篇关于意识的多种经验理论(ToCs)的非常重要的论文。该论文比较了 13 种不同的方法。创建一个论坛,让所有感兴趣的人讨论这篇论文提出的许多问题,这将是非常好的。同样重要的是,这篇论文没有提出什么。也就是说,不同的经验方法如何与意识的主观方面——感觉联系起来。在我看来,感觉是当前科学面临的最大谜团。看看这些不同的解释如何与感觉联系起来将是一件好事。