Department of Philosophy, History, Culture and Art Studies, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 18;5:237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00237. eCollection 2014.
The hard problem of consciousness has been often claimed to be unsolvable by the methods of traditional empirical sciences. It has been argued that all the objects of empirical sciences can be fully analyzed in structural terms but that consciousness is (or has) something over and above its structure. However, modern neuroscience has introduced a theoretical framework in which also the apparently non-structural aspects of consciousness, namely the so called qualia or qualitative properties, can be analyzed in structural terms. That framework allows us to see qualia as something compositional with internal structures that fully determine their qualitative nature. Moreover, those internal structures can be identified which certain neural patterns. Thus consciousness as a whole can be seen as a complex neural pattern that misperceives some of its own highly complex structural properties as monadic and qualitative. Such neural pattern is analyzable in fully structural terms and thereby the hard problem is solved.
意识的难题一直以来都被认为是传统经验科学方法无法解决的。有人认为,经验科学的所有对象都可以从结构上进行充分分析,但意识(或具有)超出其结构的东西。然而,现代神经科学引入了一种理论框架,在这个框架中,意识的明显非结构性方面,即所谓的“感受质”或定性属性,也可以从结构上进行分析。该框架使我们能够将感受质视为具有内部结构的组合,这些内部结构完全决定了它们的定性性质。此外,可以确定某些神经模式对应哪些内部结构。因此,整个意识可以被视为一种复杂的神经模式,它错误地将其自身高度复杂的结构属性感知为单一的和定性的。这样的神经模式可以用完全结构的术语进行分析,从而解决了难题。