Papadatou Danai, Kalliani Vasiliki, Karakosta Eleni, Liakopoulou Panagiota, Bluebond-Langner Myra
Faculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
"Merimna" Society for the Care of Children and Families Facing Illness and Death, Athens, Greece.
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):219-230. doi: 10.1177/0269216320967547. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
While several studies have examined 'what' families want with regard to the place of a child's end-of-life care and death, few have explored 'how' parents reach a decision.
(1) to develop a model explaining how parents of a child with a life-threatening illness in Greece decide about the place of end-of-life care and death; (2) to identify the factors affecting decision-making; (3) to consider the implications for clinical practice.
Grounded theory study of bereaved parents using semi-structured open-ended interviews following Strauss and Corbin's principles of data collection and analysis.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews with 36 bereaved parents of 22 children who died at home ( = 9) or in a paediatric hospital ( = 13) in Athens, Greece.
(1) Decisions regarding place of care and death were reached in one of four ways: consensus, accommodation, imposition of professional decisions on parents or imposition of parents' decisions without including professionals. (2) Six factors were identified as affecting decisions: awareness of dying, perceived parental caregiving competence, perceived professional competence, parents' view of symptom management, timing of decision-making, and being a 'good parent'. (3) Decisions were clear-cut or shifting. Few parents did not engage in decisions.
Parents' decisions about place of end-of-life care and death are affected by personal, interpersonal, timing and disease-related factors. Parents are best supported in decision-making when information is presented clearly and honestly with recognition of what acting as 'good parents' means to them, and opportunities to enhance their caregiving competence to care for their child at home, if they choose so.
虽然有几项研究探讨了家庭对于孩子临终关怀地点和死亡地点的“期望是什么”,但很少有研究探讨父母是“如何”做出决定的。
(1)构建一个模型,解释希腊患有危及生命疾病孩子的父母如何决定临终关怀地点和死亡地点;(2)确定影响决策的因素;(3)考虑对临床实践的启示。
采用扎根理论研究,依据施特劳斯和科尔宾的数据收集与分析原则,对丧亲父母进行半结构化开放式访谈。
背景/参与者:对希腊雅典22名在家中(=9)或儿科医院(=13)死亡孩子的36名丧亲父母进行半结构化访谈。
(1)关于护理地点和死亡地点的决定通过以下四种方式之一做出:达成共识、迁就、将专业决定强加给父母或在不包括专业人员的情况下强加父母的决定。(2)确定了六个影响决策的因素:对死亡的认知、感知到的父母照顾能力、感知到的专业能力、父母对症状管理的看法、决策时机以及成为“好父母”。(3)决定是明确的或变化的。很少有父母不参与决策。
父母关于临终关怀地点和死亡地点的决定受到个人、人际、时机和疾病相关因素的影响。当信息清晰诚实地呈现,认识到作为“好父母”对他们意味着什么,并为他们提供机会提高在家照顾孩子的照顾能力(如果他们选择这样做)时,父母在决策中能得到最好的支持。