• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在旋转门里?反复向成人保护服务机构报告的政策和实践影响

Who is in the revolving door? Policy and practice implications of recurrent reports to adult protective services.

机构信息

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California, USA.

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(5):489-508. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142.

DOI:10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142
PMID:33308080
Abstract

Repeat referral to adult protective services APS (recurrence) is a much-discussed topic among APS agencies as it may indicate ongoing harm, yet there is limited research examining prevalence or causes. This paper provides a foundational investigation of recurrence within a California APS county program. Drawing from thirty-three months of de-identified reports, we used logistic regression to examine the impact of intake report characteristics on repeat referral within one year after baseline case closure. One-fifth of the sample was recurrent (19.9%, n=987/4,958), with self-neglect being the most common type of report to recur (14.3%, n=307/2,141). Overall recurrence was predicted by female gender, older age, living alone, and multiple elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation (ANE) types reported at baseline, and report placed by social service provider, friends, family, landlords, and victim self-reports. Reporters personally related to the victim and social service providers are potential partners in identifying ANE, and alternate intervention approaches may be necessary.

摘要

重复向成人保护服务机构(APS)转介(复发)是 APS 机构讨论较多的话题,因为这可能表明持续存在伤害,但关于复发的普遍性或原因的研究有限。本文对加利福尼亚州 APS 县项目中的复发情况进行了基础调查。我们从 33 个月的匿名报告中,使用逻辑回归分析了在基线案例结案后一年内,受理报告特征对重复转介的影响。有五分之一的样本(19.9%,n=987/4958)是复发的,其中自我忽视是最常见的复发报告类型(14.3%,n=307/2141)。总体复发情况可由女性性别、年龄较大、独居以及基线时报告的多种虐待、忽视和剥削(ANE)类型预测,还可由社会服务提供者、朋友、家人、房东和受害者自我报告来预测。与受害者有个人关系的报告人和社会服务提供者可能是识别 ANE 的潜在合作伙伴,可能需要采取替代干预方法。

相似文献

1
Who is in the revolving door? Policy and practice implications of recurrent reports to adult protective services.谁在旋转门里?反复向成人保护服务机构报告的政策和实践影响
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(5):489-508. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2020.1852142.
2
Effect of an elder abuse and self-neglect intervention on repeat investigations by adult protective services: RISE project.老年虐待和自我忽视干预对成人保护服务重复调查的影响:RISE 项目。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Nov;71(11):3403-3412. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18506. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Understanding Service Utilization in Cases of Elder Abuse to Inform Best Practices.了解虐待老年人案件中的服务利用情况以指导最佳实践。
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Oct;35(10):1036-57. doi: 10.1177/0733464814563609. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
4
Variability in Findings From Adult Protective Services Investigations of Elder Abuse in California.加利福尼亚州成人保护服务机构对老年人虐待调查结果的差异
J Evid Inf Soc Work. 2016;13(1):34-44. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2014.939383. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
5
Older adults. An 11-year longitudinal study of adult protective service use.老年人。一项关于成人保护服务使用情况的11年纵向研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Feb 26;156(4):449-53. doi: 10.1001/archinte.156.4.449.
6
An analysis of elder abuse rates in Milwaukee County.密尔沃基县老年人虐待率分析。
WMJ. 2011 Dec;110(6):271-6.
7
Validity of a Self-Reported Neglect Scale Among Older Adults in Poland.波兰老年人自我报告忽视量表的有效性。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):e117-e126. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz014.
8
A Novel Intervention to Identify and Report Suspected Abuse in Older, Primary Care Patients.一种识别和报告老年初级保健患者疑似虐待的新干预措施。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1748-1754. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16433. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
9
Risk factors for reported elder abuse and neglect: a nine-year observational cohort study.报告的老年人虐待和忽视的风险因素:一项为期九年的观察性队列研究。
Gerontologist. 1997 Aug;37(4):469-74. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.4.469.
10
Adult protective service use and nursing home placement.成人保护服务的使用与养老院安置。
Gerontologist. 2002 Dec;42(6):734-9. doi: 10.1093/geront/42.6.734.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of an elder abuse and self-neglect intervention on repeat investigations by adult protective services: RISE project.老年虐待和自我忽视干预对成人保护服务重复调查的影响:RISE 项目。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Nov;71(11):3403-3412. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18506. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Adult safeguarding managers' understandings of self-neglect and hoarding.成人保护管理人员对自我忽视和囤积的理解。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4405-e4415. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13841. Epub 2022 May 17.