• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

州医学委员会政策与阿片类药物处方:一项对照中断时间序列研究

State Medical Board Policy and Opioid Prescribing: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series.

作者信息

Ranapurwala Shabbar I, Ringwalt Christopher L, Pence Brian W, Schiro Sharon, Fulcher Naoko, McCort Agnieszka, DiPrete Bethany L, Marshall Stephen W

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):343-351. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.015
PMID:33309449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7902466/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In March 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued opioid prescribing guidelines for chronic noncancer pain. In response, in April 2016, the North Carolina Medical Board launched the Safe Opioid Prescribing Initiative, an investigative program intended to limit the overprescribing of opioids. This study focuses on the association of the Safe Opioid Prescribing Initiative with immediate and sustained changes in opioid prescribing among all patients who received opioid and opioid discontinuation and tapering among patients who received high-dose (>90 milligrams of morphine equivalents), long-term (>90 days) opioid therapy.

METHODS

Controlled and single interrupted time series analysis of opioid prescribing outcomes before and after the implementation of Safe Opioid Prescribing Initiative was conducted using deidentified data from the North Carolina Controlled Substances Reporting System from January 2010 through March 2017. Analysis was conducted in 2019-2020.

RESULTS

In an average study month, 513,717 patients, including patients who received 47,842 high-dose, long-term opioid therapy, received 660,912 opioid prescriptions at 1.3 prescriptions per patient. There was a 0.52% absolute decline (95% CI= -0.87, -0.19) in patients receiving opioid prescriptions in the month after Safe Opioid Prescribing Initiative implementation. Abrupt discontinuation, rapid tapering, and gradual tapering of opioids among patients who received high-dose, long-term opioid therapy increased by 1% (95% CI= -0.22, 2.23), 2.2% (95% CI=0.91, 3.47), and 1.3% (95% CI=0.96, 1.57), respectively, in the month after Safe Opioid Prescribing Initiative implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Safe Opioid Prescribing Initiative implementation was associated with an immediate decline in overall opioid prescribing, it was also associated with an unintended immediate increase in discontinuations and rapid tapering among patients who received high-dose, long-term opioid therapy. Better policy communication and prescriber education regarding opioid tapering best practices may help mitigate unintended consequences of statewide policies.

摘要

引言

2016年3月,美国疾病控制与预防中心发布了针对慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类药物处方指南。作为回应,2016年4月,北卡罗来纳州医学委员会发起了“安全阿片类药物处方倡议”,这是一项旨在限制阿片类药物过度处方的调查项目。本研究重点关注“安全阿片类药物处方倡议”与所有接受阿片类药物治疗患者的阿片类药物处方的即时和持续变化之间的关联,以及接受高剂量(>90毫克吗啡当量)、长期(>90天)阿片类药物治疗患者的阿片类药物停药和减量情况。

方法

利用北卡罗来纳州管制物质报告系统2010年1月至2017年3月的去识别化数据,对“安全阿片类药物处方倡议”实施前后的阿片类药物处方结果进行对照和单中断时间序列分析。分析于2019 - 2020年进行。

结果

在一个平均研究月中,513,717名患者(包括47,842名接受高剂量、长期阿片类药物治疗的患者)共获得660,912张阿片类药物处方,人均1.3张。在“安全阿片类药物处方倡议”实施后的那个月,接受阿片类药物处方的患者数量绝对下降了0.52%(95%置信区间 = -0.87,-0.19)。在“安全阿片类药物处方倡议”实施后的那个月,接受高剂量、长期阿片类药物治疗的患者中,阿片类药物的突然停药、快速减量和逐渐减量分别增加了1%(95%置信区间 = -0.22,2.23)、2.2%(95%置信区间 = 0.91,3.47)和1.3%(95%置信区间 = 0.96,1.57)。

结论

虽然“安全阿片类药物处方倡议”的实施与总体阿片类药物处方的即时下降有关,但也与接受高剂量、长期阿片类药物治疗的患者停药和快速减量的意外即时增加有关。关于阿片类药物减量最佳实践的更好政策沟通和处方医生教育可能有助于减轻全州政策的意外后果。

相似文献

1
State Medical Board Policy and Opioid Prescribing: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series.州医学委员会政策与阿片类药物处方:一项对照中断时间序列研究
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Mar;60(3):343-351. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Intended and unintended consequences: Changes in opioid prescribing practices for postsurgical, acute, and chronic pain indications following two policies in North Carolina, 2012-2018 - Controlled and single-series interrupted time series analyses.预期和非预期后果:北卡罗来纳州 2012-2018 年两项政策后,手术、急性和慢性疼痛适应证的阿片类药物处方实践变化——对照和单组间断时间序列分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Jan 1;242:109727. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109727. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Impact of State Policies on Opioid Prescribing Among Surgery and Injury Patients: Controlled Interrupted Time-Series Study, North Carolina, 2014-2019.北卡罗来纳州2014 - 2019年州政策对手术及创伤患者阿片类药物处方的影响:对照中断时间序列研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Apr;34(4):e70144. doi: 10.1002/pds.70144.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Association of a State Prescribing Limits Policy with Opioid Prescribing and Long-term Use: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.州处方限制政策与阿片类药物处方和长期使用的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1862-1870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07991-7. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
6
Association Between Statewide Opioid Prescribing Interventions and Opioid Prescribing Patterns in North Carolina, 2006-2018.2006-2018 年北卡罗来纳州全州范围阿片类药物处方干预措施与阿片类药物处方模式的关联。
Pain Med. 2021 Dec 11;22(12):2931-2940. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab181.
7
Opioid Prescribing in the United States Before and After the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2016 Opioid Guideline.美国疾病预防控制中心 2016 年阿片类药物指南发布前后的阿片类药物处方情况。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Sep 18;169(6):367-375. doi: 10.7326/M18-1243. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions: Trends over Time and Implementation of Safe Opioid-Prescribing Practices.慢性肌肉骨骼疾病的阿片类药物处方:随时间的变化趋势和安全阿片类药物处方实践的实施情况。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Oct;14(5):961-972. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776879. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
9
Changes in early high-risk opioid prescribing practices after policy interventions in Washington State.华盛顿州政策干预后早期高危阿片类药物处方行为的变化。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb;56(1):49-60. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13564. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
10
Changes in Initial Opioid Prescribing Practices After the 2016 Release of the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.《2016 年美国疾病预防控制中心发布慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南后初始阿片类药物处方实践的变化》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16860.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of State Policies on Opioid Prescribing Among Surgery and Injury Patients: Controlled Interrupted Time-Series Study, North Carolina, 2014-2019.北卡罗来纳州2014 - 2019年州政策对手术及创伤患者阿片类药物处方的影响:对照中断时间序列研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Apr;34(4):e70144. doi: 10.1002/pds.70144.
2
Distribution of opioid analgesics by community racial/ethnic and socioeconomic profiles, 2011-2021.2011 - 2021年按社区种族/族裔和社会经济状况划分的阿片类镇痛药分布情况
Pain. 2025 Jan 21;166(7):1653-1661. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003511.
3
Sociogeographic determinants of rapid opioid reduction or discontinuation among patients on high-dose long-term opioid therapy in North Carolina, 2006-2018.2006 - 2018年北卡罗来纳州接受高剂量长期阿片类药物治疗患者快速减少或停用阿片类药物的社会地理决定因素
Pain Med. 2025 Feb 1;26(2):63-69. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae119.
4
Medicaid Expansion and Mortality Among Persons Who Were Formerly Incarcerated.医疗补助计划扩大与曾被监禁者的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2429454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29454.
5
Immigration Policy and the Health of Latina Mothers and Their Infants.移民政策与拉丁裔母亲及其婴儿的健康。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2023 Aug;25(4):775-789. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01476-3. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Association of a State Prescribing Limits Policy with Opioid Prescribing and Long-term Use: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis.州处方限制政策与阿片类药物处方和长期使用的关联:一项中断时间序列分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1862-1870. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07991-7. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
7
Intended and unintended consequences: Changes in opioid prescribing practices for postsurgical, acute, and chronic pain indications following two policies in North Carolina, 2012-2018 - Controlled and single-series interrupted time series analyses.预期和非预期后果:北卡罗来纳州 2012-2018 年两项政策后,手术、急性和慢性疼痛适应证的阿片类药物处方实践变化——对照和单组间断时间序列分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Jan 1;242:109727. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109727. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
8
Association of Opioid Dose Reduction With Opioid Overdose and Opioid Use Disorder Among Patients Receiving High-Dose, Long-term Opioid Therapy in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州接受高剂量、长期阿片类药物治疗的患者中,阿片类药物剂量减少与阿片类药物过量和阿片类药物使用障碍的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e229191. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9191.
9
Reduction of Long-Term Opioid Prescribing for Back Pain in Community Health Centers After a Medicaid Policy Change.医疗补助政策变更后社区卫生中心减少长期阿片类药物用于背痛治疗的处方量
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;35(2):352-369. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.02.210306.
10
"The DEA would come in and destroy you": a qualitative study of fear and unintended consequences among opioid prescribers in WV.“DEA(美国缉毒局)会介入并摧毁你”:一项针对西弗吉尼亚州阿片类药物处方医生的恐惧和意外后果的定性研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2022 Mar 10;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13011-022-00447-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Centered Reduction or Discontinuation of Long-term Opioid Analgesics: The HHS Guide for Clinicians.以患者为中心的长期阿片类镇痛药减量或停药:美国卫生与公众服务部临床医生指南
JAMA. 2019 Nov 19;322(19):1855-1856. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.16409.
2
Rethinking Opioid Dose Tapering, Prescription Opioid Dependence, and Indications for Buprenorphine.重新思考阿片类药物剂量递减、处方阿片类药物依赖以及丁丙诺啡的适应症
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Sep 17;171(6):427-429. doi: 10.7326/M19-1488. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Increased Risk of Opioid Overdose Death Following Cold Weather: A Case-Crossover Study.寒冷天气后阿片类药物过量死亡风险增加:病例交叉研究。
Epidemiology. 2019 Sep;30(5):637-641. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001041.
4
Opioid medication discontinuation and risk of adverse opioid-related health care events.阿片类药物停药与不良阿片类药物相关医疗事件风险。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Aug;103:58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 5.
5
No Shortcuts to Safer Opioid Prescribing.安全开具阿片类药物处方没有捷径可走。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2285-2287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1904190. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
6
US Emergency Department Visits for Acute Harms From Prescription Opioid Use, 2016-2017.2016-2017 年美国因处方阿片类药物使用而导致的急性伤害急诊就诊情况。
Am J Public Health. 2019 May;109(5):784-791. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305007. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
8
Challenges with Implementing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Opioid Guideline: A Consensus Panel Report.实施疾病预防控制中心阿片类药物指南的挑战:共识小组报告。
Pain Med. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):724-735. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny307.
9
Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017.药物和阿片类药物滥用相关的过量死亡-美国,2013-2017 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 4;67(5152):1419-1427. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm675152e1.
10
Opioid Prescribing in the United States Before and After the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2016 Opioid Guideline.美国疾病预防控制中心 2016 年阿片类药物指南发布前后的阿片类药物处方情况。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Sep 18;169(6):367-375. doi: 10.7326/M18-1243. Epub 2018 Aug 28.