Suppr超能文献

希巴医疗中心医护人员子女学校:我们能否安全地开学?

The Sheba Medical Center healthcare workers' children's school: can we open schools safely?

机构信息

Paediatric Infectious Disease Unit, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Israel; Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Central Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):474.e1-474.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.030. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The role of school closure in mitigating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) transmission has been questioned. In our medical centre, during a 9-week national lockdown, an alternative school was opened for health-care workers' (HCW) children with a small number of children per class and strict symptom surveillance. After lockdown was lifted we screened children and their parents for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of HCW parents and their children after one teacher contracted COVID-19 following exposure at home and 53 children were exposed, isolated and tested by RT-PCR. We compared families with children attending the alternative school with families whose children who remained at home during the 9-week lockdown. Epidemiological and medical data were collected using a short questionnaire; nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs were obtained and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, and blood was collected for SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG titres.

RESULTS

A total of 435 children attended the Sheba alternative school. Among the 53 children exposed to the infected teacher, none tested positive by RT-PCR. Of these, 18 children-parent pairs were tested for serology and all were negative. A total of 106/435 (24%) children and their 78 parents were recruited for the cross-sectional study; 70 attended the Sheba school and 36 did not. Approximately 16% of children in either group reported symptoms (11/70 in the school group and 6/36 in the 'stay home' group), but SARS-CoV-2 was not detected by PCR in any, and previous exposure, as determined by serological tests, was low and not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In an alternative school for children of HCWs, active during COVID-19 national outbreak, we found no evidence of increased infection compared with children that stayed home.

摘要

目的

学校关闭在减轻 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)传播中的作用受到质疑。在我们的医疗中心,在为期 9 周的全国封锁期间,为医护人员(HCW)的孩子开设了一所替代学校,每个班级的孩子人数较少,并严格进行症状监测。封锁解除后,我们对儿童及其父母进行了严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学筛查。

方法

在一名教师在家中接触后感染 COVID-19,随后有 53 名儿童接触、隔离并通过 RT-PCR 检测后,我们对 HCW 父母及其子女进行了横断面研究。我们将有子女就读替代学校的家庭与在 9 周封锁期间子女留在家中的家庭进行了比较。使用简短的问卷收集流行病学和医学数据;采集鼻咽和口咽拭子,通过 RT-PCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2,并采集血液检测 SARS-CoV-2 IgA 和 IgG 滴度。

结果

共有 435 名儿童就读于 Sheba 替代学校。在接触受感染教师的 53 名儿童中,没有 1 人通过 RT-PCR 检测呈阳性。其中,有 18 对儿童-父母接受了血清学检测,结果均为阴性。共有 106/435(24%)名儿童及其 78 名父母参加了横断面研究;70 名参加了 Sheba 学校,36 名没有参加。两组中约有 16%的儿童报告有症状(学校组 11/70,“居家”组 6/36),但通过 PCR 均未检测到 SARS-CoV-2,且血清学检测确定的既往暴露率均较低,两组间无显著差异。

结论

在 COVID-19 全国爆发期间,我们为 HCW 的孩子开设了一所替代学校,并未发现与留在家中的孩子相比感染率增加的证据。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
To what extent do children transmit SARS-CoV-2 virus?儿童传播新冠病毒的程度如何?
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Jun;56(6):978-979. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14937. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验