Leaper D J, Kennedy R H, Sutton A, Johnson E, Roberts N
University Department of Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, U.K.
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1987;52:7-10.
Imipenem/cilastatin at a dose of 0.5 g six hourly was compared to conventional combination therapy with ampicillin 0.5 g six hourly, metronidazole 0.5 g eight hourly and gentamicin 80 mg eight hourly (with dose adjustment by trough and peak serum levels) in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. All antibiotics were given intravenously. Forty-five patients entered the trial. Of the 19 evaluable patients in the imipenem/cilastatin group, 16 were clinically cured with five microbiological successes and two failures. Of 24 evaluable patients in the combination group, 22 were clinically cured with one microbiological success and one failure. One patient in each group suffered an adverse effect. Patients in the I/C group tended to be older with more women and more severe infections. The origin of peritonitis was similar. I/C did not differ from combination therapy in efficacy or safety and was comparable in cost. However, I/C was easier to administer than combination therapy and there was no need for serum concentration monitoring.
将亚胺培南/西司他丁以每6小时0.5 g的剂量与传统联合疗法进行比较,传统联合疗法包括每6小时0.5 g氨苄西林、每8小时0.5 g甲硝唑和每8小时80 mg庆大霉素(根据血清谷浓度和峰浓度调整剂量),用于治疗严重腹腔内感染。所有抗生素均通过静脉给药。45名患者进入试验。在亚胺培南/西司他丁组的19名可评估患者中,16例临床治愈,5例微生物学治愈,2例治疗失败。在联合治疗组的24名可评估患者中,22例临床治愈,1例微生物学治愈,1例治疗失败。每组各有1例患者出现不良反应。亚胺培南/西司他丁组的患者往往年龄较大,女性较多,感染也更严重。腹膜炎的来源相似。亚胺培南/西司他丁在疗效或安全性方面与联合疗法无差异,成本相当。然而,亚胺培南/西司他丁比联合疗法更易于给药,且无需监测血清浓度。