Suppr超能文献

比较亚胺培南-西司他丁与克林霉素及庆大霉素治疗严重外科感染的前瞻性研究。

Prospective study comparing imipenem-cilastatin with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.

作者信息

Hackford A W, Tally F P, Reinhold R B, Barza M, Gorbach S L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 1988 Mar;123(3):322-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400270056008.

Abstract

Surgical infection remains a leading cause of hospital morbidity and mortality. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of imipenem-cilastatin sodium in 32 patients with that of clindamycin phosphate and gentamicin sulfate in 25 patients. In the imipenem-cilastatin group, 87.5% had a favorable outcome, with a 12.5% failure rate and 13 adverse reactions. In the clindamycin-gentamicin group, 80% had a favorable outcome, with a 20% failure rate and ten adverse reactions. Two significant superinfections with Pseudomonas and Candida were noted in patients treated with impenem-cilastatin. Each group had one case of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis. Cost analysis showed no differences between treatment arms, except in the appendicitis subgroup. For serious surgical infections, single-agent therapy with imipenem-cilastatin appears to be as efficacious as combination therapy with clindamycin and gentamicin.

摘要

外科感染仍然是医院发病和死亡的主要原因。我们比较了32例使用亚胺培南-西司他丁钠患者与25例使用磷酸克林霉素和硫酸庆大霉素患者的疗效和毒性。在亚胺培南-西司他丁组中,87.5%的患者预后良好,失败率为12.5%,有13例不良反应。在克林霉素-庆大霉素组中,80%的患者预后良好,失败率为20%,有10例不良反应。在接受亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗的患者中发现了两例由铜绿假单胞菌和念珠菌引起的严重二重感染。每组都有1例艰难梭菌相关性结肠炎病例。成本分析显示,除阑尾炎亚组外,各治疗组之间没有差异。对于严重的外科感染,亚胺培南-西司他丁单药治疗似乎与克林霉素和庆大霉素联合治疗一样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验