Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Matsue City Hospital.
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Dec;252(4):339-351. doi: 10.1620/tjem.252.339.
In the past decade, the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix gradually increased. Recent literature revealed that the molecular pathogenesis differs by histological subtype, and the histological subtype should be considered in deciding treatments for patients with uterine cervical cancer. However, no treatment based on histological type or genomic signature has been recommended in various treatment guidelines. The Japanese treatment guidelines recommend either radical hysterectomy or definitive radiotherapy as primary treatment for patients with stage IB-IIB squamous cell carcinoma and a radical hysterectomy-based approach for those with non-squamous cell carcinoma because of its lower radiosensitivity. The impact of histological type on survival outcome of uterine cervical cancer is controversial. Our retrospective studies suggested that the difference in survival outcome by histological subtype might be remarkable with disease progression. Recent literature suggested that usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma, which is the most common histological type of cervical adenocarcinoma, showed a similar survival outcome to squamous cell carcinoma. In contrast, gastric-type mucinous carcinoma of the uterine cervix, which has aggressive clinical behavior and is not associated with high-risk human papillomavirus infection, showed resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Importantly, gastric-type mucinous carcinoma is rather common in Japan, compared with Western countries. It is therefore conceivable that the survival outcome of non-squamous cell carcinoma may be affected by regional difference in the frequency of gastric-type mucinous carcinoma. A molecular target to refractory uterine cervical cancer, such as gastric-type mucinous carcinoma of uterine cervix, still remains to be identified.
在过去的十年中,子宫颈腺癌的发病率逐渐升高。最近的文献表明,分子发病机制因组织学亚型而异,在决定子宫颈癌患者的治疗方案时应考虑组织学亚型。然而,各种治疗指南并未推荐基于组织学类型或基因组特征的治疗方法。日本的治疗指南建议,对于 IB 期-IIB 期的鳞状细胞癌患者,采用根治性子宫切除术或根治性放疗作为主要治疗方法,而非鳞状细胞癌患者则采用根治性子宫切除术为基础的方法,因为后者对放疗的敏感性较低。组织学类型对子宫颈癌生存结局的影响存在争议。我们的回顾性研究表明,组织学亚型的生存结局差异可能在疾病进展时更为显著。最近的文献表明,最常见的子宫颈腺癌组织学类型——普通型宫颈内膜腺癌,其生存结局与鳞状细胞癌相似。相比之下,具有侵袭性临床行为且与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染无关的胃型黏液性子宫颈癌对化疗和放疗具有耐药性。重要的是,与西方国家相比,胃型黏液性子宫颈癌在日本更为常见。因此,可以想象非鳞状细胞癌的生存结局可能受到胃型黏液性子宫颈癌在不同地区的发生频率的影响。仍然需要确定针对难治性子宫颈癌(如胃型黏液性子宫颈癌)的分子靶点。