Suppr超能文献

从生物心理社会模型视角看精神共病与复杂性区域疼痛综合征:一项比较研究

Psychiatric Comorbidity and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Through the Lens of the Biopsychosocial Model: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Duong Hong Phuoc, Konzelmann Michel, Vuistiner Philippe, Burrus Cyrille, Léger Bertrand, Stiefel Friedrich, Luthi François

机构信息

Department of Medical Research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.

Department of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Dec 3;13:3235-3245. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S278614. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity between patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) of the hand and non-CRPS patients and to assess the association between biopsychosocial (BPS) complexity profiles and psychiatric comorbidity in a comparative study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included a total of 103 patients with CRPS of the hand and 290 patients with chronic hand impairments but without CRPS. Psychiatric comorbidities were diagnosed by a psychiatrist, and BPS complexity was measured by means of the INTERMED. The odds ratios (OR) of having psychiatric comorbidities according to BPS complexity were calculated with multiple logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex, and pain).

RESULTS

Prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity was 29% in CRPS patients, which was not significantly higher than in non-CRPS patients (21%, relative risk=1.38, 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.01 p=0.10). The median total scores of the INTERMED were the same in both groups (23 points). INTERMED total scores (0-60 points) were related to an increased risk of having psychiatric comorbidity in CRPS patients (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.23-1.73) and in non-CRPS patients (OR=1.21; 95% CI: 1.13-1.30). The four INTERMED subscales (biological, psychological, social, and health care) were correlated with a higher risk of having psychiatric comorbidity in both groups. The differences in the OR of having psychiatric comorbidity in relation to INTERMED total and subscale scores were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The total scores, as well as all four dimensions of BPS complexity measured by the INTERMED, were associated with psychiatric comorbidity, with comparable magnitudes of association between the CRPS and non-CRPS groups. The INTERMED was useful in screening for psychological vulnerability in the two groups.

摘要

目的

在一项比较研究中,比较手部复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者与非CRPS患者精神共病的患病率,并评估生物心理社会(BPS)复杂性概况与精神共病之间的关联。

患者与方法

我们纳入了总共103例手部CRPS患者和290例有慢性手部损伤但无CRPS的患者。精神科医生诊断精神共病情况,通过INTERMED量表测量BPS复杂性。采用多元逻辑回归计算根据BPS复杂性患精神共病的比值比(OR)(校正年龄、性别和疼痛因素)。

结果

CRPS患者精神共病的患病率为29%,并不显著高于非CRPS患者(21%,相对风险=1.38,95%可信区间:0.95至2.01,p=0.10)。两组INTERMED量表的总得分中位数相同(23分)。CRPS患者(OR=1.46;95%可信区间:1.23 - 1.73)和非CRPS患者(OR=1.21;95%可信区间:1.13 - 1.30)中,INTERMED总得分(0 - 60分)与患精神共病的风险增加相关。INTERMED量表的四个子量表(生物、心理、社会和医疗保健)在两组中均与患精神共病的较高风险相关。两组中,与INTERMED总分及子量表得分相关的患精神共病的OR差异无统计学意义。

结论

通过INTERMED量表测量的BPS复杂性的总分以及所有四个维度均与精神共病相关,CRPS组和非CRPS组的关联程度相当。INTERMED量表在筛查两组的心理易损性方面很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea4/7725070/ee59fa16b473/JPR-13-3235-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验