Agroscope, Research Division Competitiveness and System Evaluation, Research Group Automation and Labour Organisation, Tänikon 1, CH-8356 Ettenhausen, Switzerland.
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Dec 9;20(24):7035. doi: 10.3390/s20247035.
Feeding behaviour can be used as an important indicator to support animal management. However, using feeding behaviour as a tool for dairy cow management an automatic sensor system is needed. Hence, the objective of this study was to setup, test and validate a ultra-high frequency (UHF) radio-frequency identification (RFID) system for measuring time dairy cows spent at the feed fence using two types of passive UHF ear tags. In a first experiment, the reading area of the system was evaluated in two antenna positions. Subsequently, the UHF RFID system was validated with video observations and compared to the measurements of chewing time of a noseband pressure sensor and of the time spent at the feed fence registered by a sensor system with real-time localisation. Differences in the reading area were detected between the two antenna positions and types of ear tag. The antenna position leading to less false positive registrations was chosen for the experiment with cows. The validation with video data showed a high average sensitivity (93.7 ± 5.6%, mean ± standard deviation), specificity (97.8 ± 1.1%), precision (93.8 ± 2.3%) and accuracy (96.9 ± 0.9%) of the UHF RFID system for measuring the time spent at the feed fence. The comparison with the noseband pressure sensor and the real-time localisation resulted in high correlations with a correlation coefficient of = 0.95 and = 0.93, respectively. However, substantial absolute differences between the three systems pointed out differences between direct and indirect measures of feeding behaviour in general and between the different sensors in particular. Thus, detailed considerations are necessary before interpreting automatically measured feeding data generally.
采食行为可用作支持动物管理的重要指标。然而,使用采食行为作为奶牛管理的工具则需要自动传感器系统。因此,本研究的目的是建立、测试和验证一种超高频(UHF)射频识别(RFID)系统,该系统使用两种类型的无源 UHF 耳标来测量奶牛在饲料围栏上的时间。在第一个实验中,评估了系统的读取区域在两种天线位置下的情况。随后,使用视频观察对 UHF RFID 系统进行了验证,并与鼻带压力传感器的咀嚼时间测量值和由具有实时定位的传感器系统记录的在饲料围栏上的时间进行了比较。在两种天线位置和耳标类型之间检测到了读取区域的差异。选择导致假阳性记录较少的天线位置进行了奶牛实验。与视频数据的验证表明,UHF RFID 系统测量在饲料围栏上的时间具有较高的平均灵敏度(93.7 ± 5.6%,平均值 ± 标准差)、特异性(97.8 ± 1.1%)、精度(93.8 ± 2.3%)和准确性(96.9 ± 0.9%)。与鼻带压力传感器和实时定位的比较结果表明,它们之间具有高度相关性,相关系数分别为 = 0.95 和 = 0.93。然而,三个系统之间的实质性绝对差异表明,总体上采食行为的直接和间接测量之间以及特别是不同传感器之间存在差异。因此,在一般解释自动测量的采食数据之前,需要进行详细的考虑。