Department for Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University School of Medicine, Essen, Germany.
Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Federal Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.
J Wound Care. 2020 Dec 2;29(12):726-734. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.12.726.
A score to identify local wound infections was developed by a panel of experts from seven European countries. The Therapeutic Index for Local Infections (TILI) score was designed for health professionals who are not specialised in wound care. This study was carried out to test the validity of the TILI score in everyday practice.
Content validity was analysed by means of evaluation by a panel of experts, individually and face-to-face, followed by a European multicentred, retrospective, observational study. Participating clinicians sent anonymised copies of completed TILI scores for patients with leg ulcers along with a photograph of the wound for analysis by two blinded reviewers. Concordance (Kappa index) and convergent criterion validity (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Youden's J Index and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) or area under the curve (AUC) curve) were calculated to construct validity and reliability.
A total of 307 patients with leg ulcers from seven institutions in five European countries were included in this retrospective analysis. It was shown that the diagnosis of local wound infection could be documented well with five of the six clinical criteria included in the TILI score. By summing up these facultative criteria in comparison with any direct criteria that may be present, there would have been an indication for local antiseptic wound therapy in 22% of patients examined.
The results show that the TILI score is concordant with the expert assessment of patients and with good diagnostic characteristics. Thus, the easy-to-use TILI score can now be used in the daily routine practice of health professionals to diagnose local wound infections.
由来自七个欧洲国家的专家组开发了一种用于识别局部伤口感染的评分系统。局部感染治疗指数(TILI)评分是专为非伤口护理专业的医疗保健专业人员设计的。本研究旨在检验 TILI 评分在日常实践中的有效性。
采用专家小组的评估方法分析内容有效性,包括个体评估和面对面评估,随后进行了一项欧洲多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。参与临床医生将完成的 TILI 评分的匿名副本以及伤口的照片发送给两位盲审员进行分析,这些评分来自腿部溃疡患者。为了评估构效关系和可靠性,计算了一致性(Kappa 指数)和收敛标准有效性(敏感性、特异性、准确性、Youden 的 J 指数和接受者操作特征(ROC)或曲线下面积(AUC)曲线)。
本回顾性分析共纳入了来自五个欧洲国家的七个机构的 307 名腿部溃疡患者。结果表明,TILI 评分中的六个临床标准中的五个可以很好地记录局部伤口感染的诊断。通过将这些任选标准与可能存在的任何直接标准相加,检查的 22%患者需要进行局部防腐伤口治疗。
结果表明,TILI 评分与患者的专家评估和良好的诊断特征一致。因此,易于使用的 TILI 评分现在可以在医疗保健专业人员的日常工作中用于诊断局部伤口感染。