Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
J Wound Care. 2020 Dec 1;29(Sup12):S16-S22. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup12.S16.
Accelerating the process of wound healing, reducing infection risks, and decreasing pain and discomfort in the burn area are important goals of burn treatment. To achieve these goals, the use of biosynthetic wound dressings has increased in recent years. Suprathel (PolyMedics Innovations, Germany) is a biosynthetic wound dressing used to treat both partial-thickness burns and split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites, full-thickness wounds, large-scale abrasions, and scar revisions.
This study is a systematic review of empirical evidence reported on the application of the biosynthetic wound dressing in burns up to 2017. Keywords such as 'Suprathel', 'effectiveness', 'safety', and 'cost' were searched in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases.
A total of 14 publications were identified, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings reported in the literature reviewed were classified in terms of safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of use of the biosynthetic wound dressing. Regarding safety and effectiveness, the dressing was found to yield desirable results, particularly for partial thickness burns and STSG donor sites. As of 2017 no health economics assessments have been carried out.
Despite the desirable advantages of the biosynthetic wound dressing with respect to its effectiveness, safety and ease of use, its major limitation was found to be its cost. However, in the absence of comprehensive studies on the quantification of all factors, there is scant scientific evidence for making reliable conclusions from this systematic review.
促进伤口愈合、降低感染风险、减少烧伤部位的疼痛和不适,是烧伤治疗的重要目标。为了实现这些目标,近年来生物合成创面敷料的使用有所增加。Suprathel(德国 PolyMedics Innovations 公司)是一种生物合成的创面敷料,用于治疗部分厚度烧伤和刃厚皮片供区、全厚度创面、大面积擦伤和瘢痕修整。
本研究是对截至 2017 年生物合成创面敷料在烧伤中的应用的实证证据进行的系统评价。在 PubMed、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库中搜索了“Suprathel”、“有效性”、“安全性”和“成本”等关键词。
根据纳入和排除标准,共确定了 14 篇出版物。文献回顾中报告的研究结果根据生物合成创面敷料的安全性、有效性和成本效益进行了分类。就安全性和有效性而言,该敷料的效果令人满意,特别是对于部分厚度烧伤和刃厚皮片供区。截至 2017 年,尚未进行任何卫生经济学评估。
尽管生物合成创面敷料在有效性、安全性和易用性方面具有理想的优势,但它的主要限制因素是成本。然而,由于缺乏对所有因素的全面量化研究,从本次系统评价中得出可靠结论的科学依据有限。