Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Mar;46(3):276-279. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102173. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
There is renewed interest in the central role of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) in cerebrovascular autonomic physiology and the pathophysiology of different primary and secondary headache disorders. There are diverse neural structures (parasympathetic, sympathetic and trigeminal sensory) that convene into the SPG which is located within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF). This makes the PPF an attractive target to neuromodulatory interventions of these different neural structures. Some experts advocate for the nasal application of local anesthetics as an effective route for SPG block with the belief that the local anesthetic can freely access the PPF. It is time to challenge this historical concept from the early 1900s. In this daring discourse, I will review anatomical studies, CT and MRI reports to debunk this old myth. Will provide anatomical evidence to explain that all these assumptions are untrue and the local anesthetic has to magically 'travel' a distance of 4-12 mm of adipose and connective tissue to reach the SPG in sufficient concentration and volume to effectively induce SPG blockade. Future research should focus on assessing a clinical biomarker to confirm SPG blockade. It could be regional cerebral blood flow or lacrimal gland secretion.
人们对翼腭窝(PPF)内蝶腭神经节(SPG)在脑血管自主生理和不同原发性和继发性头痛疾病的病理生理学中的核心作用重新产生了兴趣。有多种神经结构(副交感神经、交感神经和三叉感觉神经)汇聚到蝶腭神经节,该神经节位于翼腭窝内。这使得翼腭窝成为对这些不同神经结构进行神经调节干预的一个有吸引力的靶点。一些专家提倡将局部麻醉剂鼻内应用作为 SPG 阻滞的有效途径,他们相信局部麻醉剂可以自由进入翼腭窝。现在是时候从 20 世纪初开始挑战这个历史概念了。在这篇大胆的论述中,我将回顾解剖学研究、CT 和 MRI 报告,以揭穿这个古老的神话。我将提供解剖学证据来解释,所有这些假设都是不正确的,局部麻醉剂必须以某种神奇的方式“穿行”4-12 毫米的脂肪和结缔组织,才能以足够的浓度和体积到达蝶腭神经节,有效地诱导蝶腭神经节阻滞。未来的研究应该集中在评估一个临床生物标志物来确认 SPG 阻滞。它可以是区域性脑血流或泪腺分泌。