• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

半集约化生产系统罗非鱼养殖场福利评估方案

Tilapia On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Semi-intensive Production Systems.

作者信息

Pedrazzani Ana Silvia, Quintiliano Murilo Henrique, Bolfe Franciele, Sans Elaine Cristina de Oliveira, Molento Carla Forte Maiolino

机构信息

Animal Welfare Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná (LABEA), Curitiba, Brazil.

FAI Farms, Londrina, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 25;7:606388. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.606388. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fvets.2020.606388
PMID:33324705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7723968/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and test a tilapia on-farm welfare assessment protocol, based on Brazilian semi-intensive production systems. The study included two mains steps: the elaboration of tilapia welfare protocol and its on-field feasibility test. The protocol, including the potential indicators organized into health, environmental, nutritional, and behavioral categories, was tested on three farms. Skin, eyes, gills, jaws, fins, and vertebral spine were individually examined in 139 individual tilapias. Water physicochemical parameters and production system were considered. The overall nutritional status of individuals was assessed through body condition factor, feed conversion ratio, feed crude protein ratio, and feed ingestion behavior. During massive capture, signals of stress, level of crowding, and duration of air exposure were registered. Time required for loss of consciousness was evaluated by clinical reflexes and other behaviors during slaughter. Eye, jaw, and gill scores were different across farms (Kruskal-Wallis test, = 0.011; 0.015; 0.043, respectively), showing good discrimination power. Critical welfare points were extremely low dissolved oxygen in water, fin and skin lesions, prolonged air exposure during pre-slaughter handling and non-humane slaughter techniques, as decapitation or asphyxia. The protocol presents practical viability and it is an initial step for the development of a tilapia welfare strategy, where the prioritization of critical welfare points, implementation of corrective actions and monitoring of the results is part of a permanent welfare management system.

摘要

本研究的目的是基于巴西半集约化生产系统,开发并测试一种罗非鱼养殖场福利评估方案。该研究包括两个主要步骤:制定罗非鱼福利方案及其现场可行性测试。该方案包括组织为健康、环境、营养和行为类别的潜在指标,并在三个养殖场进行了测试。对139条罗非鱼个体分别检查了皮肤、眼睛、鳃、颌、鳍和脊椎。考虑了水的理化参数和生产系统。通过体况因子、饲料转化率、饲料粗蛋白比和饲料摄食行为评估个体的整体营养状况。在大规模捕捞过程中,记录了应激信号、拥挤程度和空气暴露时间。通过屠宰过程中的临床反射和其他行为评估失去意识所需的时间。不同养殖场的眼睛、颌和鳃的评分不同(Kruskal-Wallis检验,分别为 = 0.011;0.015;0.043),显示出良好的区分能力。关键福利点包括水中溶解氧极低、鳍和皮肤损伤、屠宰前处理过程中长时间空气暴露以及斩首或窒息等非人道屠宰技术。该方案具有实际可行性,是制定罗非鱼福利策略的第一步,其中关键福利点的优先级确定、纠正措施的实施和结果监测是永久性福利管理系统的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140f/7723968/f1a45ac6a1a3/fvets-07-606388-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140f/7723968/95e88618bbcd/fvets-07-606388-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140f/7723968/f1a45ac6a1a3/fvets-07-606388-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140f/7723968/95e88618bbcd/fvets-07-606388-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/140f/7723968/f1a45ac6a1a3/fvets-07-606388-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Tilapia On-Farm Welfare Assessment Protocol for Semi-intensive Production Systems.半集约化生产系统罗非鱼养殖场福利评估方案
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 25;7:606388. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.606388. eCollection 2020.
2
Assessment of Tilapia ( spp.) Welfare in the Semi-Intensive and Intensive Culture Systems in Thailand.泰国半集约化和集约化养殖系统中罗非鱼(罗非鱼属)福利评估。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;13(15):2498. doi: 10.3390/ani13152498.
3
Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.特邀综述:用于奶山羊农场福利评估的基于动物的指标
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):6625-48. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7493. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
4
The effects of herd size on the welfare of dairy cows in a pasture-based system using animal- and resource-based indicators.利用基于动物和资源的指标评估牧场体系中畜群规模对奶牛福利的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3406-3420. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14850. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
5
From egg to slaughter: monitoring the welfare of Nile tilapia, , throughout their entire life cycle in aquaculture.从鱼卵到屠宰:监测尼罗罗非鱼在水产养殖整个生命周期中的福利状况。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 21;10:1268396. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1268396. eCollection 2023.
6
Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.胴体损伤作为猪场内健康和福利指标的验证
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1528-1536. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1180.
7
Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare.简化肉鸡福利的“福利质量®”评估方案。
Animal. 2016 Jan;10(1):117-27. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115001706. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
8
Welfare in Nile Tilapia Production: Dorsal Fin Erection as a Visual Indicator for Insensibility.尼罗罗非鱼生产中的福利:背鳍竖起作为昏迷状态的视觉指标。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;11(10):3007. doi: 10.3390/ani11103007.
9
Test-retest reliability of the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for pigs applied to sows and piglets. Part 2. Assessment of the principles good feeding, good housing, and good health1.猪福利质量评估方案的重测信度在母猪和仔猪上的应用。第 2 部分。良好饲养、良好环境和良好健康原则的评估 1。
J Anim Sci. 2019 Mar 1;97(3):1143-1157. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz018.
10
Associations between carcass weight uniformity and production measures on farm and at slaughter in commercial broiler flocks.商品肉鸡群在农场和屠宰场的胴体重量均匀度与生产措施之间的关系。
Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4261-4268. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez252.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial: Fish Welfare in Aquaculture and Research-Where Are We Going?社论:水产养殖与研究中的鱼类福利——我们将何去何从?
Animals (Basel). 2025 Aug 12;15(16):2367. doi: 10.3390/ani15162367.
2
The welfare of farmed Nile tilapia: a review.养殖尼罗罗非鱼的福利:综述
Front Vet Sci. 2025 May 6;12:1567984. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1567984. eCollection 2025.
3
A New Cell Line from the Brain of Red Hybrid Tilapia ( spp.) for Tilapia Lake Virus Propagation.一种来自红罗非鱼(spp.)脑部的用于罗非鱼湖病毒增殖的新细胞系。

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Welfare and Stressors in Fish: Challenges Facing Aquaculture.社论:鱼类的福利与应激源:水产养殖面临的挑战
Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 25;11:162. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00162. eCollection 2020.
2
Perception of Fish Sentience, Welfare and Humane Slaughter by Highly Educated Citizens of Bogotá, Colombia and Curitiba, Brazil.哥伦比亚波哥大市和巴西库里提巴市受过高等教育的公民对鱼类感知、福利和人道屠宰的看法
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0168197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168197. eCollection 2017.
3
Sensitivity of the Welfare Quality® broiler chicken protocol to differences between intensively reared indoor flocks: which factors explain overall classification?
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 22;14(11):1522. doi: 10.3390/ani14111522.
4
Estimating global numbers of farmed fishes killed for food annually from 1990 to 2019.估算1990年至2019年期间每年全球为获取食物而宰杀的养殖鱼类数量。
Anim Welf. 2023 Feb 6;32:e12. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.4. eCollection 2023.
5
From egg to slaughter: monitoring the welfare of Nile tilapia, , throughout their entire life cycle in aquaculture.从鱼卵到屠宰:监测尼罗罗非鱼在水产养殖整个生命周期中的福利状况。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 21;10:1268396. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1268396. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessment of Tilapia ( spp.) Welfare in the Semi-Intensive and Intensive Culture Systems in Thailand.泰国半集约化和集约化养殖系统中罗非鱼(罗非鱼属)福利评估。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;13(15):2498. doi: 10.3390/ani13152498.
7
Non-Invasive Methods for Assessing the Welfare of Farmed White-Leg Shrimp ().评估养殖凡纳滨对虾福利的非侵入性方法()。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(5):807. doi: 10.3390/ani13050807.
8
Ackonc-AWA: A multi-species animal welfare assessment protocol for wild animals under human care to overcome the use of generic welfare checklists.Ackonc-AWA:一种针对人类照料下野生动物的多物种动物福利评估方案,以克服通用福利检查表的使用问题。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Dec 8;9:1033821. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1033821. eCollection 2022.
9
Looking beyond the Shoal: Fish Welfare as an Individual Attribute.超越浅滩:作为个体属性的鱼类福利
Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;12(19):2592. doi: 10.3390/ani12192592.
10
Welfare Indicators in Tilapia: An Epidemiological Approach.罗非鱼的福利指标:一种流行病学方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jun 27;9:882567. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.882567. eCollection 2022.
福利质量®肉鸡协议对密集饲养的室内鸡群之间差异的敏感性:哪些因素解释了总体分类?
Animal. 2017 Feb;11(2):244-253. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116001476. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
On-FarmWelfare Assessment Protocol for Adult Dairy Goats in Intensive Production Systems.集约化生产系统中成年奶山羊的农场福利评估方案
Animals (Basel). 2015 Sep 25;5(4):934-50. doi: 10.3390/ani5040393.
5
Simplifying the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for broiler chicken welfare.简化肉鸡福利的“福利质量®”评估方案。
Animal. 2016 Jan;10(1):117-27. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115001706. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
6
Ectoparasites of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in cage farming in a hydroelectric reservoir in Brazil.巴西一座水电水库网箱养殖尼罗罗非鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)的体外寄生虫
Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2014 Apr-Jun;23(2):171-8. doi: 10.1590/s1984-29612014041.
7
A framework for studying emotions across species.研究跨物种情感的框架。
Cell. 2014 Mar 27;157(1):187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.003.
8
Safeguarding the welfare of farmed fish at harvest.保障养殖鱼类在收获时的福利。
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2012 Feb;38(1):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10695-011-9561-5. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
9
Injuries and deformities in fish: their potential impacts upon aquacultural production and welfare.鱼类的损伤和畸形:对水产养殖生产和福利的潜在影响。
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2012 Feb;38(1):61-83. doi: 10.1007/s10695-011-9557-1. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
10
Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish.养殖鱼类福利的行为指标。
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2012 Feb;38(1):17-41. doi: 10.1007/s10695-011-9518-8. Epub 2011 Jul 28.