Rucinque Daniel Santiago, Souza Ana Paula Oliveira, Molento Carla Forte Maiolino
Animal Welfare Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0168197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168197. eCollection 2017.
Discussions on farm animal welfare have become frequent, especially in developed countries. The aim of this research was to study the perception of fish sentience, welfare and slaughter by highly educated citizens from Bogotá, Colombia, and Curitiba, Brazil. An online survey with 12 questions presented as open-ended, multiple choice and 5-point Likert-type scale formats was available to respondents. Answers from 395 participants in Bogotá and 387 in Curitiba were analyzed, and results are presented in the order Bogotá followed by Curitiba. The percentage of participants who perceived fish as sentient animals was 79.7% and 71.8%. The classification of sentience perception among taxonomic groups seems in accordance with the phylogenetic proximity to humans, suggesting participants were more likely to perceive sentience in mammals than in other animals. The descending order related to the highest perception of fish suffering in different scenarios was fishing with hook and line (75.6%, 70.6%); municipal live fish fair (68.7%-only in Curitiba); fish-and-pay ponds (59.7%, 54.4%); fish kept as laboratory animals (58.0, 48.1%); fish farming (35.7, 36.8%); fish in pet stores (35.5%, 26.1%); production of ornamental fish (19.3%, 21.8%); fish in aquarium exhibits (18.8%,16.9%); and fish kept as pets (12.4%,12.3%). Lack of knowledge about the conditions of capture, handling, transport and sale of ornamental fish may justify the perception of low level of suffering in the last scenarios. Regarding humane slaughter, 57.0% and 55.0% of respondents were unaware of the issue. After reflection induced by the questionnaire, 76.0% and 72% of participants believed that fish should be included in humane slaughter regulations. This study presents original data suggesting that respondents from Bogotá and Curitiba consider fish as sentient beings. The perception of suffering in specific scenarios challenges common activities. Recognition of suffering also endorses humane slaughter regulations to reduce pain in a large number of individuals of fish slaughtered annually for human consumption in Colombia and Brazil.
关于农场动物福利的讨论日益频繁,尤其是在发达国家。本研究旨在调查哥伦比亚波哥大和巴西库里蒂巴受过高等教育的公民对鱼类感知能力、福利及屠宰的看法。调查采用在线问卷形式,包含12个问题,题型有开放式、多项选择题和5分量表。对波哥大的395名参与者和库里蒂巴的387名参与者的回答进行了分析,结果按波哥大、库里蒂巴的顺序呈现。认为鱼类有感知能力的参与者比例分别为79.7%和71.8%。不同分类群体的感知能力分类似乎与它们和人类的系统发育亲缘关系一致,这表明参与者认为哺乳动物比其他动物更可能有感知能力。在不同场景中,人们认为鱼类遭受痛苦程度从高到低依次为:用鱼钩钓鱼(75.6%,70.6%);市政活鱼市场(68.7%,仅在库里蒂巴);付费钓鱼池塘(59.7%,54.4%);实验室饲养的鱼(58.0%,48.1%);养鱼场(35.7%,36.8%);宠物店的鱼(35.5%,26.1%);观赏鱼养殖(19.3%,21.8%);水族馆展览的鱼(18.8%,16.9%);宠物鱼(12.4%,12.3%)。对观赏鱼捕捞、处理、运输和销售条件缺乏了解,可能是导致人们认为最后几种场景中鱼类痛苦程度较低的原因。关于人道屠宰,57.0%和55.