Fitbit Research, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Center for Genomic Medicine and Cardiovascular Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Dec;2(12):e650-e657. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30246-6. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
BACKGROUND: Heart rate variability, or the variation in the time interval between consecutive heart beats, is a non-invasive dynamic metric of the autonomic nervous system and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular death. Consumer wrist-worn tracking devices using photoplethysmography, such as Fitbit, now provide the unique potential of continuously measuring surrogates of sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system activity through the analysis of interbeat intervals. We aimed to leverage wrist-worn trackers to derive and describe diverse measures of cardiac autonomic function among Fitbit device users. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we collected interbeat interval data that are sent to a central database from Fitbit devices during a randomly selected 24 h period. Age, sex, body-mass index, and steps per day in the 90 days preceding the measurement were extracted. Interbeat interval data were cleaned and heart rate variability features were computed. We analysed heart rate variability metrics across the time (measured via the root mean square of successive RR interval differences [RMSSD] and SD of the RR interval [SDRR]), frequency (measured by high-frequency and low-frequency power), and graphical (measured by Poincare plots) domains. We considered 5 min windows for the time and frequency domain metrics and 60 min measurements for graphical domain metrics. Data from participants were analysed to establish the correlation between heart rate variability metrics and age, sex, time of day, and physical activity. We also determined benchmarks for heart rate variability (HRV) metrics among the users. FINDINGS: We included data from 8 203 261 Fitbit users, collected on Sept 1, 2018. HRV metrics decrease with age, and parasympathetic function declines faster than sympathetic function. We observe a strong diurnal variation in the heart rate variability. SDRR, low-frequency power, and Poincare S show a significant variation with sex, whereas such a difference is not seen with RMSSD, high-frequency power, and Poincare S. For males, when measured from 0600 h to 0700 h, the mean low-frequency power decreased by a factor of 66·5% and high-frequency power decreased by a factor of 82·0% from the age of 20 years to 60 years. For females, the equivalent factors were 69·3% and 80·9%, respectively. Comparing low-frequency power between males and females at the ages of 40-41 years, measured from 0600 h to 0700 h, we found excess power in males, with a Cohen's d effect size of 0·33. For high-frequency power, the equivalent effect size was -0·04. Increased daily physical activity, across age and sex, was highly correlated with improvement in diverse measures of heart rate variability in a dose-dependent manner. We provide benchmark tables for RMSSD, SDRR, high and low frequency powers, and Poincare S and S, separately for different ages and sex and computed at two times of the day. INTERPRETATION: Diverse metrics of cardiac autonomic health can be derived from wrist-worn trackers. Empirical distributions of heart rate variability can potentially be used as a framework for individual-level interpretation. Increased physical activity might yield improvement in heart rate variability and requires prospective trials for confirmation. FUNDING: Fitbit.
背景:心率变异性,即连续心跳之间时间间隔的变化,是自主神经系统的一种非侵入性动态指标,也是心血管死亡的独立风险因素。现在,使用光体积描记法的消费者腕戴式追踪设备(如 Fitbit)具有独特的潜力,可以通过分析心跳间隔来连续测量交感和副交感神经系统活动的替代指标。我们旨在利用腕戴式追踪器来推导和描述 Fitbit 设备使用者的不同心脏自主功能指标。
方法:在这项横断面研究中,我们收集了 Fitbit 设备在随机选择的 24 小时期间发送到中央数据库的心跳间隔数据。提取了测量前 90 天的年龄、性别、体重指数和每天的步数。对心跳间隔数据进行清理并计算心率变异性特征。我们分析了心率变异性指标在时间(通过均方根差的连续 RR 间隔差异[RMSSD]和 RR 间隔的标准差[SDRR]来衡量)、频率(通过高频和低频功率来衡量)和图形(通过 Poincaré 图来衡量)域。我们考虑了 5 分钟的时间和频率域指标窗口和 60 分钟的图形域指标测量。对参与者的数据进行分析,以确定心率变异性指标与年龄、性别、一天中的时间和身体活动之间的相关性。我们还确定了心率变异性(HRV)指标在使用者中的基准。
结果:我们纳入了 2018 年 9 月 1 日收集的来自 8203261 名 Fitbit 用户的数据。HRV 指标随年龄增长而降低,副交感功能的下降速度快于交感功能。我们观察到心率变异性存在强烈的昼夜变化。SDRR、低频功率和 Poincaré S 随性别有明显变化,而 RMSSD、高频功率和 Poincaré S 则没有这种差异。对于男性,当从 0600 小时到 0700 小时测量时,从 20 岁到 60 岁,低频功率的平均降低幅度为 66.5%,高频功率的降低幅度为 82.0%。对于女性,相应的因子分别为 69.3%和 80.9%。比较男性和女性在 40-41 岁时在 0600 小时至 0700 小时之间的低频功率,我们发现男性的功率较高,Cohen's d 效应量为 0.33。对于高频功率,等效的效应量为-0.04。随着年龄和性别的不同,每天增加的身体活动与心率变异性的多种指标的改善呈高度相关,呈剂量依赖性。我们为 RMSSD、SDRR、高和低频率功率以及 Poincaré S 和 S 分别提供了不同年龄和性别的基准表,并在一天中的两个时间点进行了计算。
解释:可以从腕戴式追踪器中得出心脏自主健康的不同指标。心率变异性的经验分布可能可以作为个体水平解释的框架。增加身体活动可能会改善心率变异性,需要前瞻性试验来确认。
资助:Fitbit。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020-12
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009-10
Sensors (Basel). 2025-8-8
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-6-13
Sensors (Basel). 2025-5-17