Richter Maria, Paul Mariella, Höhle Barbara, Wartenburger Isabell
Cognitive Sciences, Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:565651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565651. eCollection 2020.
One of the most important social cognitive skills in humans is the ability to "put oneself in someone else's shoes," that is, to take another person's perspective. In socially situated communication, perspective taking enables the listener to arrive at a meaningful interpretation of what is said (sentence meaning) and what is meant (speaker's meaning) by the speaker. To successfully decode the speaker's meaning, the listener has to take into account which information he/she and the speaker share in their common ground (CG). We here further investigated competing accounts about when and how CG information affects language comprehension by means of reaction time (RT) measures, accuracy data, event-related potentials (ERPs), and eye-tracking. Early integration accounts would predict that CG information is considered immediately and would hence not expect to find costs of CG integration. Late integration accounts would predict a rather late and effortful integration of CG information during the parsing process that might be reflected in integration or updating costs. Other accounts predict the simultaneous integration of privileged ground (PG) and CG perspectives. We used a computerized version of the referential communication game with object triplets of different sizes presented visually in CG or PG. In critical trials (i.e., conflict trials), CG information had to be integrated while privileged information had to be suppressed. Listeners mastered the integration of CG (response accuracy 99.8%). Yet, slower RTs, and enhanced late positivities in the ERPs showed that CG integration had its costs. Moreover, eye-tracking data indicated an early anticipation of referents in CG but an inability to suppress looks to the privileged competitor, resulting in later and longer looks to targets in those trials, in which CG information had to be considered. Our data therefore support accounts that foresee an early anticipation of referents to be in CG but a rather late and effortful integration if conflicting information has to be processed. We show that both perspectives, PG and CG, contribute to socially situated language processing and discuss the data with reference to theoretical accounts and recent findings on the use of CG information for reference resolution.
人类最重要的社会认知技能之一是“设身处地为他人着想”的能力,即能够从他人的角度看待问题。在社交情境中的交流中,换位思考能使听众对说话者所说的内容(句子含义)以及说话者的意图(说话者的意思)做出有意义的解读。为了成功解码说话者的意思,听众必须考虑他/她与说话者在共同基础(CG)中共享的信息。我们在此通过反应时间(RT)测量、准确性数据、事件相关电位(ERP)和眼动追踪,进一步研究了关于CG信息何时以及如何影响语言理解的不同观点。早期整合观点预测CG信息会立即被考虑,因此预计不会发现CG整合的成本。后期整合观点预测在解析过程中CG信息的整合会相当晚且费力,这可能会反映在整合或更新成本上。其他观点预测特权基础(PG)和CG视角会同时整合。我们使用了参考交流游戏的计算机化版本,其中不同大小的对象三元组以视觉方式呈现在CG或PG中。在关键试验(即冲突试验)中,必须整合CG信息,同时抑制特权信息。听众掌握了CG的整合(反应准确率为99.8%)。然而,较慢的反应时间以及ERP中增强的晚期正波表明CG整合是有成本的。此外,眼动追踪数据表明在CG中对指称对象有早期预期,但无法抑制看向特权竞争者的目光,导致在那些必须考虑CG信息的试验中,对目标的注视更晚且持续时间更长。因此,我们的数据支持那些预见在CG中对指称对象有早期预期,但如果必须处理冲突信息则整合相当晚且费力的观点。我们表明,PG和CG这两种视角都有助于社交情境中的语言处理,并结合理论观点和关于使用CG信息进行指称消解的最新研究结果来讨论这些数据。