Reivan-Ortiz Geovanny Genaro, Ortiz Rodas Patricia Elizabeth, Reivan Ortiz Patricia Natali
. Responsible Teacher Department of Formative Research. Collaborator Laboratory of Psychometry. Catholic University of Cuenca. Ecuador. Catholic University of Cuenca Ecuador.
. University of Palermo. Argentina. Universidad de Palermo University of Palermo Argentina.
Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2020 Jul-Dec;13(2):14-24. doi: 10.21500/20112084.4325.
Due to the scarcity of evaluation instruments on the construct of difficulties in emotional regulation in the Ecuadorian university context, the objective of the present study was to adapt linguistically and to study the psychometric properties of the Difficulty Scale in Emotional Regulation (DERS) in a sample of Ecuadorian university students. A non-probability sample of 1172 participants between 17 and 32 years of age (M = 21.99; DT = 2.49), which consisted of 58.6% women and 41.4% men, was used. The research was carried out in three stages. The first study evaluated the Ecuadorian linguistic adaptation of the scale. The second study referred to the factorization by main axes identifying five factors (Lack of emotional understanding; Limited access to regulation strategies; Difficulties in impulse control; Interferences in goal-directed behaviors; Lack of emotional clarity) theoretically interpretable, which explain 49.22% of the variance. The third study developed a confirmatory factor analysis that specified an acceptable fit of the model (GFI = .95; AGFI = .95; NFI = .94; RMR = .11). The reliability coefficients are acceptable as .90 Cronbach's alpha and .91 McDonald's omega. In conclusion, it is mentioned that the Ecuadorian version of the DERS in a university sample exhibits good psychometric characteristics of internal structure and responses.
由于在厄瓜多尔大学环境中,缺乏针对情绪调节困难这一构念的评估工具,本研究的目的是进行语言改编,并在厄瓜多尔大学生样本中研究情绪调节困难量表(DERS)的心理测量特性。使用了一个非概率样本,包括1172名年龄在17至32岁之间的参与者(M = 21.99;DT = 2.49),其中女性占58.6%,男性占41.4%。该研究分三个阶段进行。第一项研究评估了该量表的厄瓜多尔语言适应性。第二项研究通过主轴因子分析确定了五个理论上可解释的因子(缺乏情绪理解;调节策略的获取有限;冲动控制困难;目标导向行为中的干扰;情绪清晰度不足),这些因子解释了49.22%的方差。第三项研究进行了验证性因子分析,结果表明模型拟合度可接受(GFI = .95;AGFI = .95;NFI = .94;RMR = .11)。信度系数也可接受,克朗巴哈α系数为.90,麦克唐纳ω系数为.91。总之,研究提到DERS的厄瓜多尔版本在大学样本中展现出良好的内部结构和反应的心理测量特征。