• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会处方——应用常识的努力:驱动力与挑战

Social Prescribing-An Effort to Apply a Common Knowledge: Impelling Forces and Challenges.

作者信息

Islam M Mofizul

机构信息

Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;8:515469. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469
PMID:33330299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7728793/
Abstract

In recent times, social prescribing has been introduced in some countries, and substantially in the U.K. The objective of this scheme is to offer non-medical care mainly to primary care patients. Although the idea of this scheme is not new, its formalization is. Using a narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed and gray literature, this article discusses the social prescribing scheme, some of its compelling aspects and challenges in offering non-medical care, particularly regarding referrals being made from primary care settings. The social prescribing scheme has several impelling forces that include its potential to turn primary care to primary healthcare, tackle social determinants of health and social needs, improve wellbeing and physical health, offer person-centered care, strengthen preventive care, and bridge healthcare organizations with the third sector. This scheme also faces several challenges including service standards and boundaries, sustainability, availability of appropriate services, low engagement of clients and insufficient evidence. While this scheme lacks validated evidence, it is theoretically compelling. Given that the demand for non-medical care is growing in most societies and that the usefulness of non-medical care is gaining prominence, social prescribing is likely to continue to proliferate.

摘要

近年来,一些国家引入了社会处方,英国引入的程度颇高。该计划的目标是主要为初级保健患者提供非医疗护理。尽管该计划的理念并不新颖,但其正式确立却是新事物。本文通过对同行评审文献和灰色文献的叙述性综合,探讨了社会处方计划、其一些引人关注的方面以及在提供非医疗护理方面面临的挑战,特别是关于从初级保健机构进行转诊的问题。社会处方计划有几个推动因素,包括将初级保健转变为初级卫生保健的潜力、解决健康和社会需求的社会决定因素、改善幸福感和身体健康、提供以人为本的护理、加强预防保健以及在医疗保健组织与第三部门之间架起桥梁。该计划也面临一些挑战,包括服务标准和界限、可持续性、适当服务的可获得性、客户参与度低以及证据不足。虽然该计划缺乏经过验证的证据,但在理论上很有说服力。鉴于大多数社会对非医疗护理的需求不断增长,且非医疗护理的效用日益凸显,社会处方可能会继续普及。

相似文献

1
Social Prescribing-An Effort to Apply a Common Knowledge: Impelling Forces and Challenges.社会处方——应用常识的努力:驱动力与挑战
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 27;8:515469. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469. eCollection 2020.
2
Link workers' perspectives on factors enabling and preventing client engagement with social prescribing.链接工作者对促进和阻碍客户参与社会处方的因素的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):991-998. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12716. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
3
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
4
A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector.社会处方的现实主义评价:对连接初级保健与志愿部门途径的背景及机制的探索
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 May;19(3):232-245. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000706. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
5
Social prescribing by students: the design and delivery of a social prescribing scheme by medical students in general practice.医学生在全科医疗中开展的社会处方:社会处方计划的设计和实施。
Educ Prim Care. 2020 Sep;31(5):318-322. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1799437. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
6
Applying critical systems thinking to social prescribing: a relational model of stakeholder "buy-in".运用批判系统思维进行社会处方:利益相关者“认同”的关系模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 24;20(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05443-8.
7
Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review.实施和提供社会处方服务的促进因素与障碍:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2893-4.
8
The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence.社会处方服务对服务使用者的影响:证据的系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):664-673. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz078.
9
More than signposting: Findings from an evaluation of a social prescribing service.超越路标指示:一项社会处方服务评估的结果。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e5105-e5114. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13925. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
10
Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis.了解社会处方服务的有效性和机制:一项混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3437-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Social prescribing to improve health and well-being of patients presenting with non-medical health related social needs in primary care: Study protocol of a multi-center randomized controlled pragmatic feasibility trial.社会处方改善基层医疗中存在与健康相关非医疗社会需求患者的健康和福祉:一项多中心随机对照实用可行性试验的研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0322372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322372. eCollection 2025.
2
How to improve support for people with (complex) multiple-problems through social prescribing in a vulnerable neighborhood; professionals', experts-by-experience' and clients' perspectives.如何通过在弱势社区进行社会处方来改善对(复杂)多重问题人群的支持;专业人员、有经验者和客户的观点。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 15;26(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02867-1.
3
A multidimensional analysis of older adults wellbeing and health literacy in Alentejo: a cross-sectional study.阿连特茹地区老年人幸福感与健康素养的多维度分析:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1514968. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1514968. eCollection 2025.
4
Does social prescribing address social determinants of health?社会处方能否解决健康的社会决定因素?
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 6;13:1531801. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1531801. eCollection 2025.
5
Preliminary effectiveness of social prescription and virtual patient information in increasing tertiary prevention among cancer patients (ESPRIT): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled pilot trial.社会处方和虚拟患者信息在提高癌症患者三级预防中的初步效果(ESPRIT):一项单中心随机对照试验的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e087177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087177.
6
Interrogating green social prescribing in South Wales; A multi-stakeholder qualitative exploration.探究南威尔士的绿色社会处方;多利益相关者的定性探索。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 9;20(1):e0314107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314107. eCollection 2025.
7
Sounds of Nature and Hearing Loss: A Call to Action.自然之声与听力损失:行动呼吁。
Ear Hear. 2025;46(2):298-304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001601. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
8
The challenges and rewards of social prescribing in family medicine.家庭医学中社会处方的挑战与回报。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 14;4:1446397. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1446397. eCollection 2024.
9
Stakeholder views on addressing challenges to the implementation of social prescribing in the United Kingdom.利益相关者对英国社会处方实施挑战应对措施的看法。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 11;4:1413711. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711. eCollection 2024.
10
Building common understanding: seeking consensus and defining social prescribing across contexts - a collective commentary on a Delphi study.建立共识:在不同背景下寻求共识和定义社会处方——对德尔菲研究的集体评论。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 24;24(1):1280. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11603-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of social prescribing services on service users: a systematic review of the evidence.社会处方服务对服务使用者的影响:证据的系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):664-673. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz078.
2
Social prescribing.社会处方
BMJ. 2019 Mar 28;364:l1285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1285.
3
Social Determinants of Health and Related Inequalities: Confusion and Implications.健康的社会决定因素及相关不平等现象:困惑与影响
Front Public Health. 2019 Feb 8;7:11. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00011. eCollection 2019.
4
Evaluability assessments as an approach to examining social prescribing.评估可评估性作为一种考察社会处方的方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):1085-1094. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12726. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
5
Link workers' perspectives on factors enabling and preventing client engagement with social prescribing.链接工作者对促进和阻碍客户参与社会处方的因素的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):991-998. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12716. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Social prescribing: where is the evidence?社会处方:证据何在?
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):6-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700325.
7
Physician experiences and barriers to addressing the social determinants of health in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a qualitative research study.东地中海区域医生应对健康社会决定因素的经历与障碍:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3408-z.
8
Delivering a primary care-based social prescribing initiative: a qualitative study of the benefits and challenges.提供基于初级保健的社会处方计划:一项关于效益和挑战的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul;68(672):e487-e494. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X696617. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
The use of arts interventions for mental health and wellbeing in health settings.在卫生环境中使用艺术干预措施促进心理健康和福祉。
Perspect Public Health. 2018 Jul;138(4):209-214. doi: 10.1177/1757913918772602. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Social Prescribing in the U.S. and England: Emerging Interventions to Address Patients' Social Needs.美国和英国的社会处方:满足患者社会需求的新兴干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):715-718. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Mar 15.