• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对英国社会处方实施挑战应对措施的看法。

Stakeholder views on addressing challenges to the implementation of social prescribing in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Rafiei Sima, Honary Mahsa, Mezes Barbara

机构信息

School of Management Sciences, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 11;4:1413711. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711
PMID:39464518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11502469/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to understand the key barriers to successfully implementing Social Prescribing (SP) initiatives from different perspectives.

METHODS

An in-depth process evaluation using a multi-method qualitative design was conducted. Qualitative data was collected via semi-structured interviews ( = 23) and Focus Group Discussion (FGD'  = 4). Twenty-three stakeholders took part in the study, including community support providers ( = 7), SP link workers ( = 6), service users ( = 6), NHS employees/referrals, and those who were involved in SP leadership and coordination ( = 4). MAXQDA Version 20.0 was used for management and data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified eight themes representing challenges for a successful implementation of a SP programme. The themes included (i) financial issues and sustainability, (ii) human resources challenges, (iii) partnership working challenges, (iv) inadequate and inconsistent implementation, (v) information system challenges, (vi) referral system issues, (vii) training and knowledge gaps, and (viii) accessibility and privacy concerns.

CONCLUSION

Study findings provide insight for commissioners, providers, and link workers to guide the delivery of appropriate SP services by identifying a range of factors that hinder the successful implementation of the programme. Future policy, service development, and research should consider tackling these challenges and generating different ideas for potential solutions to address the root causes of problems.

摘要

目标

本研究旨在从不同角度了解成功实施社会处方(SP)倡议的关键障碍。

方法

采用多方法定性设计进行深入的过程评估。通过半结构化访谈(n = 23)和焦点小组讨论(FGD,n = 4)收集定性数据。23名利益相关者参与了该研究,包括社区支持提供者(n = 7)、SP联络人员(n = 6)、服务使用者(n = 6)、国民保健服务(NHS)员工/转诊人员以及参与SP领导和协调的人员(n = 4)。使用MAXQDA 20.0版本进行管理和数据分析。

结果

我们确定了八个主题,这些主题代表了成功实施SP计划所面临的挑战。这些主题包括:(i)财务问题和可持续性,(ii)人力资源挑战,(iii)合作工作挑战,(iv)实施不足和不一致,(v)信息系统挑战,(vi)转诊系统问题,(vii)培训和知识差距,以及(viii)可及性和隐私问题。

结论

研究结果为专员、提供者和联络人员提供了见解,通过识别一系列阻碍该计划成功实施的因素来指导提供适当的SP服务。未来的政策、服务发展和研究应考虑应对这些挑战,并针对潜在解决方案提出不同的想法,以解决问题的根本原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b6/11502469/35298ea00ab9/frhs-04-1413711-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b6/11502469/35298ea00ab9/frhs-04-1413711-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0b6/11502469/35298ea00ab9/frhs-04-1413711-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Stakeholder views on addressing challenges to the implementation of social prescribing in the United Kingdom.利益相关者对英国社会处方实施挑战应对措施的看法。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 11;4:1413711. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1413711. eCollection 2024.
2
3
Women's Health Hubs: a rapid mixed-methods evaluation.妇女健康中心:快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(30):1-138. doi: 10.3310/JYFT5036.
4
Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review.实施和提供社会处方服务的促进因素与障碍:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2893-4.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Implementing a social prescribing program in primary care units in Portugal: A qualitative study exploring enablers, barriers and lessons learned from the perspectives of stakeholders involved in the program implementation.在葡萄牙的基层医疗单位实施社会处方计划:一项从参与该计划实施的利益相关者角度探索促进因素、障碍和经验教训的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0306404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306404. eCollection 2024.
7
Stakeholder views of podiatry services in the UK for people living with arthritis: a qualitative study.英国关节炎患者足部医学服务的利益相关者观点:一项定性研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Sep 24;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00427-7.
8
Meeting social welfare legal needs in end-of-life care: co-creation of a system-wide research partnership.满足临终关怀中的社会福利法律需求:全系统研究伙伴关系的共同创建。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-21. doi: 10.3310/YGRA9852.
9
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.伦敦急诊部脆弱青年暴力干预方案:快速评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492.
10
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-designing implementation strategies for social prescribing in Lancashire and South Cumbria: a qualitative study with a participatory approach.共同设计兰开夏郡和南坎布里亚郡社会处方的实施策略:一项采用参与式方法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 2;15(4):e094522. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094522.

本文引用的文献

1
Theories used to develop or evaluate social prescribing in studies: a scoping review.用于研究中制定或评估社会处方的理论:一项范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10563-6.
2
Can social prescribing put the 'social' into the biopsychosocial management of people with long-term musculoskeletal disorders?社会处方能否将“社会因素”纳入长期肌肉骨骼疾病患者的生物心理社会管理中?
Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Dec;21(4):1341-1352. doi: 10.1002/msc.1810. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
3
Social prescribing practices and learning across the North West Coast region: essential elements and key challenges to implementing effective and sustainable social prescribing services.
西北海岸地区的社会处方实践和学习:实施有效和可持续的社会处方服务的基本要素和主要挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 31;23(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09574-6.
4
Progressing social prescribing with a focus on process of connection: Evidence-informed guidance for robust evaluation and evidence synthesis.推进以联系过程为重点的社会处方:基于证据的稳健评估和证据综合指南。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Mar 17;5:100380. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100380. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis.基层医疗中经常就诊者的社会处方:经济分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:902199. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.902199. eCollection 2022.
6
Intervention components of link worker social prescribing programmes: A scoping review.社会处方链接工作者干预措施的组成部分:范围综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3761-e3774. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14056. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
Global developments in social prescribing.社会处方的全球发展。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008524.
8
Financing Approaches to Social Prescribing Programs in England and the United States.英、美两国社会处方项目的筹资方式
Milbank Q. 2022 Jun;100(2):393-423. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12562. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study.有复杂情感需求人群的社区心理健康服务中服务使用者的观点:一项共同制作的定性访谈研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 27;22(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03605-4.
10
Community-Enhanced Social Prescribing: Integrating Community in Policy and Practice.社区强化社会处方:将社区融入政策与实践
Int J Community Wellbeing. 2022;5(1):179-195. doi: 10.1007/s42413-020-00080-9. Epub 2020 Dec 2.