Suppr超能文献

老年人日常生活活动困难及对帮助的需求:来自ELSI-COVID-19倡议的社会 distancing 模型证据。 (注:原文中“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,这里可能是特定语境下的专业术语表述,按字面翻译为“社会 distancing” )

Difficulty in performing activities of daily living and the need for help in older adults: evidence on social distancing models from the ELSI-COVID-19 initiative.

作者信息

Oliveira Dayane Capra de, Oliveira Cesar Messias de, Lima-Costa Maria Fernanda, Alexandre Tiago da Silva

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brasil.

University College London, London, U.K.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 18;36(suppl 3):e00213520. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00213520. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

To analyze whether the older adults with difficulty or need of help to perform basic or instrumentals activities of daily living are more socially distanced in times of COVID-19. A total of 4,035 older adults participated in the telephone interviews from the second wave of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil). Difficulty, need and receiving help were classified into: (1) independents; (2) had difficulty without need for care; (3) had difficulty, needed and have received care from someone within their household; (4) had difficulty, needed and have received care from someone outside their household; and (5) had difficulty and needed care but did not receive it. Social distancing was categorized as follows: did not leave their houses in the last 7 days, left their houses for essential activities and went out for non-essential activities. Multinomial regression model adjusted for age, sex, schooling and great geographical region was performed. Older adults who had difficulty, needed and have received help from within their homes (odds ratio - OR = 2.34 95%CI: 1.25-4.39) or from outside their homes (OR = 3.94; 95%CI: 2.24-6.92) were more socially distanced. Age increased the odds of not going out (OR = 1.06; 95%CI: 1.03-1.09) while be men reduced it (OR = 0.48; 95%CI: 0.33-0.70). Living in the South of Brazil has increased the odds of the respondents going out for essential activities (OR = 1.77; 95%CI: 1.01-3.10). Older adults who had difficulty, needed and have received help from within or outside their homes did not leave their homes in the last 7 days. Even with social distancing, these older adults can not have their exposure to COVID-19 reduced, weakening the theory of selective social distancing.

摘要

分析在新冠肺炎疫情期间,在进行基本或工具性日常生活活动时有困难或需要帮助的老年人是否在社交上更加疏离。共有4035名老年人参与了巴西老龄化纵向研究(ELSI - 巴西)第二轮的电话访谈。困难程度、需求和接受帮助的情况分为:(1)独立者;(2)有困难但无需护理;(3)有困难、需要且已接受家庭内部人员的护理;(4)有困难、需要且已接受家庭外部人员的护理;(5)有困难且需要护理但未得到护理。社交疏离情况分类如下:在过去7天未离开家门、因必要活动离开家门以及因非必要活动外出。进行了针对年龄、性别、受教育程度和大地理区域调整的多项回归模型分析。在家庭内部(优势比 - OR = 2.34,95%置信区间:1.25 - 4.39)或家庭外部(OR = 3.94;95%置信区间:2.24 - 6.92)有困难、需要且已接受帮助的老年人在社交上更加疏离。年龄增加了不外出的几率(OR = 1.06;95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.09),而男性则降低了这种几率(OR = 0.48;95%置信区间:0.33 - 0.70)。生活在巴西南部增加了受访者因必要活动外出的几率(OR = 1.77;95%置信区间:1.01 - 3.10)。在家庭内部或外部有困难、需要且已接受帮助的老年人在过去7天未离开家门。即使采取了社交疏离措施,这些老年人也无法减少接触新冠病毒的机会,这削弱了选择性社交疏离理论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验